Instructure, the company that operates Canvas, has confirmed that it addressed the incident directly.
-
@h2onolan Imagine the mindset that's satisfied with that assurance. What an enjoyable way to live as an individual.
@cR0w “when we said criminal earlier, that was a regrettable mistake. What we meant was partner. A trustworty professional partner who knows where my kids go to school and where the nursing home my mom lives is located”
-
@cR0w “when we said criminal earlier, that was a regrettable mistake. What we meant was partner. A trustworty professional partner who knows where my kids go to school and where the nursing home my mom lives is located”
@h2onolan you think people would do that dot png
-
@cR0w oh ffs... they paid a ransom?
-
Instructure, the company that operates Canvas, has confirmed that it addressed the incident directly. Based on the information they have shared, the data involved was returned to Instructure. They also received assurances that the data will not be further shared and confirmation that any copies were deleted. Instructure has stated that no schools or districts will be extorted as a result of this incident.
@cR0w I'll never understand this logic. "How do you know the morally bankrupt cybercriminals actually got rid of your data?"
"They gave us a receipt."
Yeah...sure...
-
-
-
@cR0w I'll never understand this logic. "How do you know the morally bankrupt cybercriminals actually got rid of your data?"
"They gave us a receipt."
Yeah...sure...
@rossmadness @cR0w it's never not amusing whenever i read about a big organisations suddenly becoming naive when dealing with morally bankrupt people.
As though as they somehow managed to get to become a multi-million company by just a bunch of "trust us bro"
-
Instructure, the company that operates Canvas, has confirmed that it addressed the incident directly. Based on the information they have shared, the data involved was returned to Instructure. They also received assurances that the data will not be further shared and confirmation that any copies were deleted. Instructure has stated that no schools or districts will be extorted as a result of this incident.
@cR0w@infosec.exchange So... Instructure will be on the hook if it does happen? I'm not sure how exactly this works on the legal side.
-
@cR0w I'll never understand this logic. "How do you know the morally bankrupt cybercriminals actually got rid of your data?"
"They gave us a receipt."
Yeah...sure...
@rossmadness @cR0w hold onto that receipt, it's a deductible business expense
-
@cR0w I'll never understand this logic. "How do you know the morally bankrupt cybercriminals actually got rid of your data?"
"They gave us a receipt."
Yeah...sure...
@rossmadness @cR0w but but but... their business relies on being trustworthy! They need to, otherwise the industry suffers! And no one would ever act against their industries interest! All the cybertalkingheads told me!!!
-
Instructure, the company that operates Canvas, has confirmed that it addressed the incident directly. Based on the information they have shared, the data involved was returned to Instructure. They also received assurances that the data will not be further shared and confirmation that any copies were deleted. Instructure has stated that no schools or districts will be extorted as a result of this incident.
@cR0w the terminator : 'i'll be back'
actually, wait, i'm still here
(brain:
s/Free-for-T/hot for t/g)
-
@cR0w oh ffs... they paid a ransom?
-
@cR0w I'll never understand this logic. "How do you know the morally bankrupt cybercriminals actually got rid of your data?"
"They gave us a receipt."
Yeah...sure...
@rossmadness @cR0w It turns out that seeing a way to pretend to solve your problem by spending other people's money and letting other people bear the ongoing risk just gives you a warm feeling of childish trust.
Plus, when you are lawful evil seeing chaotic evil probably just reminds you of your carefree younger days; when you would have been frolicking on the intertubes not being a saashole who has to do earnings calls.
-
@cR0w@infosec.exchange So... Instructure will be on the hook if it does happen? I'm not sure how exactly this works on the legal side.
@phil IDK how it works either but I highly doubt they will be held responsible.
-
@phil IDK how it works either but I highly doubt they will be held responsible.
@cR0w@infosec.exchange Sad. There is a definite deficit of accountability.
-
@cR0w the terminator : 'i'll be back'
actually, wait, i'm still here
(brain:
s/Free-for-T/hot for t/g) -
@cR0w@infosec.exchange Sad. There is a definite deficit of accountability.
@phil Isn't that the whole point of becoming a publicly traded company in America? It sure seems that way.
-
@rossmadness @cR0w but but but... their business relies on being trustworthy! They need to, otherwise the industry suffers! And no one would ever act against their industries interest! All the cybertalkingheads told me!!!
@nyanbinary @cR0w I was discussing the Instructure hack with a friend who works for a school district and he stated that almost exactly. I told him that yes, that makes sense if we believe they care about "organization reputation" in the same economic incentive driven context as a regular business. Which I highly doubt. But let's assume they do follow this logic.
What keeps them from selling a copy quietly to another criminal and then THAT criminal actions the data somewhere else without directly saying "Instructure". TAs double dip and keep their "reputation" intact.
-
Instructure, the company that operates Canvas, has confirmed that it addressed the incident directly. Based on the information they have shared, the data involved was returned to Instructure. They also received assurances that the data will not be further shared and confirmation that any copies were deleted. Instructure has stated that no schools or districts will be extorted as a result of this incident.
@cR0w The amount of comfort this provides me is *immeasurable.
* It's zero. The number is zero.
-
@cR0w the terminator : 'i'll be back'
actually, wait, i'm still here
(brain:
s/Free-for-T/hot for t/g)"Our offering was leveraged by an unauthorized actor in their activity."
I don't think even CNN could come out with a voice that passive. Dude had to completely mangle the semantic structure of that sentence just to thread the needle between the obvious truth, and a lie blatant enough to be visible from the moon.
Hey Steve, go apologise to your high school English teacher.
