Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So systemD added a birthdate field to the JSON records managed by userdb:https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/40954

So systemD added a birthdate field to the JSON records managed by userdb:https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/40954

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
5 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    prism@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    So systemD added a birthdate field to the JSON records managed by userdb:
    https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/40954

    A PR to revert this was denied:
    https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/41179

    This is apparently an attempt to satisfy new legal requirements in various US states and elsewhere around age verification.

    My question: since we've already established RedHat's willingness to jump and twirl for Palantir like trained seals, when will they jump and twirl for us? Or do the applicable laws not count in this case because they only affect disabled people?

    prism@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • prism@infosec.exchangeP prism@infosec.exchange

      So systemD added a birthdate field to the JSON records managed by userdb:
      https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/40954

      A PR to revert this was denied:
      https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/41179

      This is apparently an attempt to satisfy new legal requirements in various US states and elsewhere around age verification.

      My question: since we've already established RedHat's willingness to jump and twirl for Palantir like trained seals, when will they jump and twirl for us? Or do the applicable laws not count in this case because they only affect disabled people?

      prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
      prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
      prism@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Cue the inevitable whining how complying with surveillance capitalism is super easy whereas doing what's right for your users is hrrrrrrrd 😞

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • prism@infosec.exchangeP prism@infosec.exchange

        Cue the inevitable whining how complying with surveillance capitalism is super easy whereas doing what's right for your users is hrrrrrrrd 😞

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        tamasg@mindly.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @prism I think what will suck more is when a lot of mainstream distros adopt that birthday field on user accounts, and then, of course, we have forked copies and distros that just build a version with this removed anyway. Not like this will stop alt distros from emerging without it in the first place, I would think.

        prism@infosec.exchangeP 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • T tamasg@mindly.social

          @prism I think what will suck more is when a lot of mainstream distros adopt that birthday field on user accounts, and then, of course, we have forked copies and distros that just build a version with this removed anyway. Not like this will stop alt distros from emerging without it in the first place, I would think.

          prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          prism@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Tamasg Hey man, it's your choice! You don't have to use the birthday thing if you don't want to, we are just building an optional field that is optional because we are options people who like options. Why are you mad at us? You wouldn't hit a guy with glasswes, would you?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T tamasg@mindly.social

            @prism I think what will suck more is when a lot of mainstream distros adopt that birthday field on user accounts, and then, of course, we have forked copies and distros that just build a version with this removed anyway. Not like this will stop alt distros from emerging without it in the first place, I would think.

            prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
            prism@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
            prism@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @Tamasg As much as I like Linux, there are unfortunately not enough distributions out there, so at least this goes some way to solving that problem.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups