Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. would you play a tiny daily version of js crossword?

would you play a tiny daily version of js crossword?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
6 Posts 4 Posters 12 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
    rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
    rebane2001@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    RE: https://infosec.exchange/@rebane2001/116632169141393181

    would you play a tiny daily version of js crossword?

    wheels@gotosocial.wheelsbot.devW polywolf@infosec.exchangeP jorendorff@federate.socialJ 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR rebane2001@infosec.exchange

      RE: https://infosec.exchange/@rebane2001/116632169141393181

      would you play a tiny daily version of js crossword?

      wheels@gotosocial.wheelsbot.devW This user is from outside of this forum
      wheels@gotosocial.wheelsbot.devW This user is from outside of this forum
      wheels@gotosocial.wheelsbot.dev
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @rebane2001 Maybe not daily, but I'd certainly do weekly or monthly.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR rebane2001@infosec.exchange

        RE: https://infosec.exchange/@rebane2001/116632169141393181

        would you play a tiny daily version of js crossword?

        polywolf@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
        polywolf@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
        polywolf@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @rebane2001 yes!!!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR rebane2001@infosec.exchange

          RE: https://infosec.exchange/@rebane2001/116632169141393181

          would you play a tiny daily version of js crossword?

          jorendorff@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jorendorff@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jorendorff@federate.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @rebane2001 23A was the next-to-last clue I got, it took forever, so difficult...

          and look who did the review on the patch adding the array spread operator to firefox

          Link Preview Image
          574130 - (harmony:spreadarray) Prototype Harmony's spread operator for arrays in SpiderMonkey

          RESOLVED (benjamin) in Core - JavaScript Engine. Last updated 2014-05-19.

          favicon

          (bugzilla.mozilla.org)

          and I *think* the patch that made strings iterable was this one, although it kind of fell out of other changes almost for free

          https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725907

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR rebane2001@infosec.exchange

            RE: https://infosec.exchange/@rebane2001/116632169141393181

            would you play a tiny daily version of js crossword?

            jorendorff@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jorendorff@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jorendorff@federate.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @rebane2001 obsessively

            makes me wish the language was worse, tbh

            i love that the answer in the picture for `[object Object]5` is wrong. everything about this is the best

            rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jorendorff@federate.socialJ jorendorff@federate.social

              @rebane2001 obsessively

              makes me wish the language was worse, tbh

              i love that the answer in the picture for `[object Object]5` is wrong. everything about this is the best

              rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
              rebane2001@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
              rebane2001@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @jorendorff how is the answer in the picture wrong?

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups