❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
@blogdiva Consumers are obstacles to acquiring money too
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
@blogdiva "sentient organic bipedal operational input resources"
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
@blogdiva Reminds me of the railroad execs a few years ago with their idiotic statements like:
"The Carriers maintain that capital investment and risk are the reasons for their profits, not any contributions by labor."
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
And the solution to this (in their eyes) will be to continue scaling AI in hopes that it will become cheaper to do AI than hire human beings.
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
@blogdiva the exec said "employees". it's the JOURNALIST that's using this language to activate you.
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
@blogdiva heidegger called this, 'enframement'.
The standing reserve aspect (bestand).
It fits the techbros perspective quite well. I wrote a brief thing on it recently... Heidegger died in 1976, but...
Fits well.
Heidegger's Enframement (Gestell) - KnowProSE.com
Enframement, it seems, is something more people should be aware of.
KnowProSE.com (knowprose.com)
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
@blogdiva if you think of capitalism, capital is the excess profit after paying costs, including labour costs. Capital, therefore, is necessarily predicated on the exploitation of labour.
This is why the capitalist wet dream has always been eliminating labour.
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
-
@blogdiva heidegger called this, 'enframement'.
The standing reserve aspect (bestand).
It fits the techbros perspective quite well. I wrote a brief thing on it recently... Heidegger died in 1976, but...
Fits well.
Heidegger's Enframement (Gestell) - KnowProSE.com
Enframement, it seems, is something more people should be aware of.
KnowProSE.com (knowprose.com)
it’s my TL;DR on Marx’s theory of alienation.
-
RE: https://assortedflotsam.com/@smeg/116488609327705013
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞
“human workers”
not experts. not the people with special knolwledge and unique expertise whose labor give their products and services that je ne sais quoi capitalists get to pocket as profits.
NOPE.
❝ human workers ❞
capitalists have NO IDEA how their wealth is made. they only know money and to them, workers are the middlemen between them & profits.
that’s why they want to believe AI is finally ridding them of workers.
FAFO time
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
