Oh, this is BAD.
-
RE: https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/116065340523529645
Oh, this is BAD. Slop on the front page...?!
Aurich says an investigation has been opened, and we'll hear the results next week.
(Aurich was also careful not to say slop was posted. Just that there made have been a policy violation. But I don't see any other way to explain the second half of the piece being hallucinatory quotes that were never uttered on the GitHub thread in question.)
I look forward to the results of this investigation.
-
RE: https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/116065340523529645
Oh, this is BAD. Slop on the front page...?!
Aurich says an investigation has been opened, and we'll hear the results next week.
(Aurich was also careful not to say slop was posted. Just that there made have been a policy violation. But I don't see any other way to explain the second half of the piece being hallucinatory quotes that were never uttered on the GitHub thread in question.)
I look forward to the results of this investigation.
@jimsalter Just so we're all looking at the right things, the fictitious quotes were attributed to Shambaugh's follow-up blog post, not the initial PR thread.
