Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed.

At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
23 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • lcamtuf@infosec.exchangeL lcamtuf@infosec.exchange

    At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed.

    When I push back, I get two reactions. Authors say that it just helps them express themselves. AI promoters say "get used to it".

    I don't think we should: it boils down to asymmetry. Our time here is limited. Social interaction on the internet breaks down if it takes ~0 effort to publish, but readers are still expected to use their own eyeballs and brains to engage.

    So, I feel that we have three choices:

    1) Refuse to engage with LLM writing *no matter if the article makes a good point or not*.

    2) Embrace it and have my agent argue with your agent forever, for internet points.

    3) Call it quits and move to an off-the-grid cabin in the woods.

    loathsome_dongeater@toots.matapacos.dogL This user is from outside of this forum
    loathsome_dongeater@toots.matapacos.dogL This user is from outside of this forum
    loathsome_dongeater@toots.matapacos.dog
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @lcamtuf I don't understand the "LLM helped the poor sod whose first language is English express himself" point because every time I read an LLMism like "it is not x, its y" I feel like a part of my soul has been devoured. Bad human-written prose is better than copy-pasting LLM generated text. At that point, the friction of constructing prose which makes your thoughts coherent has been eliminated. No one should waste time reading it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lcamtuf@infosec.exchangeL lcamtuf@infosec.exchange

      At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed.

      When I push back, I get two reactions. Authors say that it just helps them express themselves. AI promoters say "get used to it".

      I don't think we should: it boils down to asymmetry. Our time here is limited. Social interaction on the internet breaks down if it takes ~0 effort to publish, but readers are still expected to use their own eyeballs and brains to engage.

      So, I feel that we have three choices:

      1) Refuse to engage with LLM writing *no matter if the article makes a good point or not*.

      2) Embrace it and have my agent argue with your agent forever, for internet points.

      3) Call it quits and move to an off-the-grid cabin in the woods.

      kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @lcamtuf

      "LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed"

      fourth choice-- get tf off whatever πŸ’€ hellscape πŸ’€ masquerading as "social" media you're seeing this on!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lcamtuf@infosec.exchangeL lcamtuf@infosec.exchange

        At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed.

        When I push back, I get two reactions. Authors say that it just helps them express themselves. AI promoters say "get used to it".

        I don't think we should: it boils down to asymmetry. Our time here is limited. Social interaction on the internet breaks down if it takes ~0 effort to publish, but readers are still expected to use their own eyeballs and brains to engage.

        So, I feel that we have three choices:

        1) Refuse to engage with LLM writing *no matter if the article makes a good point or not*.

        2) Embrace it and have my agent argue with your agent forever, for internet points.

        3) Call it quits and move to an off-the-grid cabin in the woods.

        atlefren@snabelen.noA This user is from outside of this forum
        atlefren@snabelen.noA This user is from outside of this forum
        atlefren@snabelen.no
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @lcamtuf option 3 is much more rewarding at least

        Link Preview Image
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups