Many countries have nuclear weapons and all of them make me uncomfortable.
-
Many countries have nuclear weapons and all of them make me uncomfortable. Russia, North Korea, the US...
Is "this country might get a powerful bomb, possibly maybe later, we swear to God it's real this time" a good reason to attack them? Is anyone buying this at all?
I think attacking a country gives them more reasons to make bigger bombs and ... attack back?
Am I too naive to understand international politics?
-
Many countries have nuclear weapons and all of them make me uncomfortable. Russia, North Korea, the US...
Is "this country might get a powerful bomb, possibly maybe later, we swear to God it's real this time" a good reason to attack them? Is anyone buying this at all?
I think attacking a country gives them more reasons to make bigger bombs and ... attack back?
Am I too naive to understand international politics?
@futurebird It's US the one that resigned from STAR, it's US the only one who ever used nuclear bombs against civilians. It's US who is attacking half the world. Get afraid of the US, don't put Russia or North Korea on front.
-
Many countries have nuclear weapons and all of them make me uncomfortable. Russia, North Korea, the US...
Is "this country might get a powerful bomb, possibly maybe later, we swear to God it's real this time" a good reason to attack them? Is anyone buying this at all?
I think attacking a country gives them more reasons to make bigger bombs and ... attack back?
Am I too naive to understand international politics?
I think I'm being gaslit by the media into feeling like this is too complicated for me to understand when it's really very simple. Nothing the US is doing is about pursuing peace, or making the lives of any ordinary person in any country especially the US any better.
These guys are excited to have control of the US military and all of that power and are just making up excuses to do things with it.
There is no justification. No benefit.
-
Many countries have nuclear weapons and all of them make me uncomfortable. Russia, North Korea, the US...
Is "this country might get a powerful bomb, possibly maybe later, we swear to God it's real this time" a good reason to attack them? Is anyone buying this at all?
I think attacking a country gives them more reasons to make bigger bombs and ... attack back?
Am I too naive to understand international politics?
-
Many countries have nuclear weapons and all of them make me uncomfortable. Russia, North Korea, the US...
Is "this country might get a powerful bomb, possibly maybe later, we swear to God it's real this time" a good reason to attack them? Is anyone buying this at all?
I think attacking a country gives them more reasons to make bigger bombs and ... attack back?
Am I too naive to understand international politics?
@futurebird By my recollection, the evidence that Iran made plans to build nuclear weapons all dates from _after_ G. W. Bush threatened them with nuclear bombardment.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
@futurebird It's US the one that resigned from STAR, it's US the only one who ever used nuclear bombs against civilians. It's US who is attacking half the world. Get afraid of the US, don't put Russia or North Korea on front.
OK but when you start there someone pops out from behind a tree and calls you an unamerican peace-nick.
And then, because I am very anti-war and probably a peace-nick or whatever that gives me pause and by then they have started six more wars.
Why does "you hippie, you want the US to be weak" shut down the conversation? What they are doing still makes no sense. Even if you love nonsense like "the strategic application of force."
-
I think I'm being gaslit by the media into feeling like this is too complicated for me to understand when it's really very simple. Nothing the US is doing is about pursuing peace, or making the lives of any ordinary person in any country especially the US any better.
These guys are excited to have control of the US military and all of that power and are just making up excuses to do things with it.
There is no justification. No benefit.
@futurebird I get more than a bit stressed out about that the Temu Tyrant have (allegedly) have said repeatedly that he want to blow a nuke.
And I believe he have said it, that he is serious about it, and is just trying to create enough of an excuse to do it ...
I mean, with all the other madness that is happening, what is NOT on the table these days? -
Many countries have nuclear weapons and all of them make me uncomfortable. Russia, North Korea, the US...
Is "this country might get a powerful bomb, possibly maybe later, we swear to God it's real this time" a good reason to attack them? Is anyone buying this at all?
I think attacking a country gives them more reasons to make bigger bombs and ... attack back?
Am I too naive to understand international politics?
@futurebird No, you have the gist. The geopolitics of Iran are pretty rough, surrounded by nuclear powers they have to placate, bluff, or bribe at every turn, no matter what the internal pressures may be. If they become a nuclear power as well, most of that calculation shifts toward bluff, which no one knows whether that would be better or worse because it hasn't happened yet.
-
@futurebird By my recollection, the evidence that Iran made plans to build nuclear weapons all dates from _after_ G. W. Bush threatened them with nuclear bombardment.
Lots of people want to have bombs. I don't really understand why I should care about this particular one. They seem no more or less trustworthy than the rest.
-
I think I'm being gaslit by the media into feeling like this is too complicated for me to understand when it's really very simple. Nothing the US is doing is about pursuing peace, or making the lives of any ordinary person in any country especially the US any better.
These guys are excited to have control of the US military and all of that power and are just making up excuses to do things with it.
There is no justification. No benefit.
@futurebird Oh, I'm sure that there's a bunch of other reasons in there, too from various parties. I just don't know whether those are at the forefront of the "reasoning" of the decision-makers, or just in the minds of the people feeding them ideas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves_in_Iran
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/why-venezuela-has-more-oil-than-any-country-on-earth/articleshow/128499683.cms -
@futurebird Oh, I'm sure that there's a bunch of other reasons in there, too from various parties. I just don't know whether those are at the forefront of the "reasoning" of the decision-makers, or just in the minds of the people feeding them ideas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves_in_Iran
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/why-venezuela-has-more-oil-than-any-country-on-earth/articleshow/128499683.cms"follow the money" is often a good way to understand the truth.
But I don't even think this makes sense from that standpoint. Not totally.
This is more like what would happen if you gave me a big box of fireworks and told me to "keep them safe"
After a few weeks you'd hear the cracks and booms of me setting them off just to see what happened.
only, this is a lot less fun.
-
OK but when you start there someone pops out from behind a tree and calls you an unamerican peace-nick.
And then, because I am very anti-war and probably a peace-nick or whatever that gives me pause and by then they have started six more wars.
Why does "you hippie, you want the US to be weak" shut down the conversation? What they are doing still makes no sense. Even if you love nonsense like "the strategic application of force."
@futurebird I'd say fuck off to every little narrow minded usanian with that spinned, twisted rethoric. I got tired of justifying myself to avoid straw man attacks for stating the obvious.
-
OK but when you start there someone pops out from behind a tree and calls you an unamerican peace-nick.
And then, because I am very anti-war and probably a peace-nick or whatever that gives me pause and by then they have started six more wars.
Why does "you hippie, you want the US to be weak" shut down the conversation? What they are doing still makes no sense. Even if you love nonsense like "the strategic application of force."
Do I want the US to be weak?
This is such an out of context, notion that it short circuits my brain. It's so far from anything I'm thinking about at all.
I would like to NOT die in a fire please. I would like there to be fewer wars. I would like the manufacture of weapons designed to kill people in the tens of thousands to be unprofitable since they have so few applications.
We could manufacture other things instead.
-
Most people are not paying attention. I think they have realized that.
But we could change this I think.
-
I think I'm being gaslit by the media into feeling like this is too complicated for me to understand when it's really very simple. Nothing the US is doing is about pursuing peace, or making the lives of any ordinary person in any country especially the US any better.
These guys are excited to have control of the US military and all of that power and are just making up excuses to do things with it.
There is no justification. No benefit.
@futurebird people living through that collapse of eastern europe & estern germany say: to stay in power you need more power, so everything authoritarians do only has one purpose: consolidate power. they told me never to forget this re:trump.
-
I think I'm being gaslit by the media into feeling like this is too complicated for me to understand when it's really very simple. Nothing the US is doing is about pursuing peace, or making the lives of any ordinary person in any country especially the US any better.
These guys are excited to have control of the US military and all of that power and are just making up excuses to do things with it.
There is no justification. No benefit.
@futurebird zero sum gangsters with daddy issues. There will never be enough to fill the void inside them https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/116147593290228667
-
@rood @futurebird given the fact the US is constantly involved in attacks on other countries and that the US weapons budget is so ginormous, weapons R&D and battle testing is regularly in full tilt. Exercises don't test weapons (and the military) like concrete military actions do. Something russia has found out in Ukraine, something the EU/rest of NATO needs to be aware of (and seems to be).
-
@rood @futurebird given the fact the US is constantly involved in attacks on other countries and that the US weapons budget is so ginormous, weapons R&D and battle testing is regularly in full tilt. Exercises don't test weapons (and the military) like concrete military actions do. Something russia has found out in Ukraine, something the EU/rest of NATO needs to be aware of (and seems to be).
80 years of the US "interventions" and losing every time hasn't taught most Americans anything yet...
@futurebird Yes you are being gaslit---you are not naive
-
@FediThing the Orange Caligula crowd doesn't need to be convinced, their King can do as he pleases.
His handlers want this so they can harvest oil reserves, like they did with Venezuela, and eliminate a regional actor from doing what they can, like limiting access to their national exclusive waters on the Persian Gulf - apart from all the "sword brandishing" around "Death to Country this and that" and alleged terrorism financing/support/training.
@futurebird -
@futurebird By my recollection, the evidence that Iran made plans to build nuclear weapons all dates from _after_ G. W. Bush threatened them with nuclear bombardment.
@futurebird IMHO, the 'why' has a lot to do with Iran being an energy exporter at a time when the US exports a great deal of energy and also seized control of Venezuelan exports. It makes Russian & Saudi exports more valuable as well.
But also, a reason why Trumpists want to nix intl law & human rights is bc bodies like the UN refused to lie about Iraq & Iran nuclear inspections. They desperately want working class people to accept the lies and fight each other.
