Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Does it still make sense to maintain deterministic code generators?

Does it still make sense to maintain deterministic code generators?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
jsonschemallmopenapiprogrammingpythonlapidary
1 Posts 1 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mattesilver@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattesilver@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattesilver@fe.disroot.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    Does it still make sense to maintain deterministic code generators? I mean for #OpenAPI. Since #JSONSchema translates so badly to classes in any programming language, generating with #LLM might work better with guessing what the author of the OpenAPI document or the generator library had in mind.

    Than again, it's a bit of a coin flip 😕

    #programming #pythonLapidary
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups