Dear kids, this is what happens when you let AI design your core infrastructure architecture...
-
@erincandescent I don't think so:
- it would break existing applications
- it probably has the same/similar security implications
- they explicitly mention "X-Forwarded-For" by name- definitely
- you wrap the unmodified TLS bytestream in it
- yeah….
-
-
@littlefox@gotosocial-dev.svc.0x0a.network @manawyrm@chaos.social @amy@mastodon.fibercut.org Für jeden SQL-Befehl?
-
@littlefox@gotosocial-dev.svc.0x0a.network @manawyrm@chaos.social @amy@mastodon.fibercut.org Für jeden SQL-Befehl?
-
RE: https://ipv6.social/@tschaefer/116071588412706294
Dear kids, this is what happens when you let AI design your core infrastructure architecture...
"For HTTP/HTTPS: The gateway automatically adds the X-Forwarded-For header. Configure your web server (for example: Nginx or Apache) to evaluate this header."
European sovereign clouds!!
EDIT: I don't even know how they want to add this header in HTTPS traffic... Maybe (i hope?) this whole article really is just hallucinated
@manawyrm just give your cert to that gateway ^^
-
@manawyrm just give your cert to that gateway ^^
-
@littlefox I mean, they have APIs for that
https://docs.api.stackit.cloud/documentation/certificates/version/v2 -
@manawyrm and i thought digitalocean making customers share /64s was bad
-
R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
