Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Google Broke reCAPTCHA for De-Googled Android Users https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users

Google Broke reCAPTCHA for De-Googled Android Users https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
29 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

    Google Broke reCAPTCHA for De-Googled Android Users https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users

    Google has tied its next-generation reCAPTCHA system to Google Play Services on Android, meaning anyone running a de-Googled phone will automatically fail verification when the system decides to challenge them. Another day another Google take over the world, open web and mobile ecosystems. This battle seems to be lost already because governments are ignoring shenanigans of Google.

    musiquenow@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
    musiquenow@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
    musiquenow@todon.eu
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @nixCraft

    Google slogan: Be REALLY Evil

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

      Google Broke reCAPTCHA for De-Googled Android Users https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users

      Google has tied its next-generation reCAPTCHA system to Google Play Services on Android, meaning anyone running a de-Googled phone will automatically fail verification when the system decides to challenge them. Another day another Google take over the world, open web and mobile ecosystems. This battle seems to be lost already because governments are ignoring shenanigans of Google.

      spacebug@n3.mikronod.seS This user is from outside of this forum
      spacebug@n3.mikronod.seS This user is from outside of this forum
      spacebug@n3.mikronod.se
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @nixCraft so I guess there will be some website that I will not be visiting then.
      Too bad for them..

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      • maat@mastodon.socialM maat@mastodon.social

        @nixCraft then let's get rid of Android Phones and live to linux ones. If only oss contributors moved to linux mobiles and started to provide mobile apps for linux on mobiles it would change the world... ONG and public EU administrations would move, mobile constructors to avoid loosing critical customers would provide at least some phones with linux and Google would step back in the end.

        asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
        asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
        asterisk@social.linux.pizza
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @maat @nixCraft

        Linux is a terrible option for general security, which is especially important for a device as personal as your phone. Nothing is encrypted and Flatpak's sandboxing is worse than Android 4.4 and grants broad permissions by default.

        maat@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R rufus01@mastodon.social

          @nixCraft when will the new captcha be in production ?

          asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
          asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
          asterisk@social.linux.pizza
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @rufus01 @nixCraft Considering many haven't updated from reCAPTCHAv2 I don't think we'll see this much.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

            Google Broke reCAPTCHA for De-Googled Android Users https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users

            Google has tied its next-generation reCAPTCHA system to Google Play Services on Android, meaning anyone running a de-Googled phone will automatically fail verification when the system decides to challenge them. Another day another Google take over the world, open web and mobile ecosystems. This battle seems to be lost already because governments are ignoring shenanigans of Google.

            asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
            asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
            asterisk@social.linux.pizza
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @nixCraft The funniest part is that a lot of apps use Google libraries (which means most "degoogled" setups aren't actually degoogled) which can act like a copy of Play Services themselves, so those apps could be a viable option for verification if Google insists on an app, but Google's gotta have that invasive Play Services access, right?

            edit: Blog post because the article above doesn't cite its sources:

            https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/introducing-google-cloud-fraud-defense-the-next-evolution-of-recaptcha

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

              Google Broke reCAPTCHA for De-Googled Android Users https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users

              Google has tied its next-generation reCAPTCHA system to Google Play Services on Android, meaning anyone running a de-Googled phone will automatically fail verification when the system decides to challenge them. Another day another Google take over the world, open web and mobile ecosystems. This battle seems to be lost already because governments are ignoring shenanigans of Google.

              O This user is from outside of this forum
              O This user is from outside of this forum
              oioi@techhub.social
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @nixCraft So, when you see the QR on your laptop, you'll need to scan it with your phone? I guess, this should reveal who (Google account) is trying to open the site.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA asterisk@social.linux.pizza

                @maat @nixCraft

                Linux is a terrible option for general security, which is especially important for a device as personal as your phone. Nothing is encrypted and Flatpak's sandboxing is worse than Android 4.4 and grants broad permissions by default.

                maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                maat@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @asterisk @nixCraft Linux is not terrible at all if setup properly. A linux with a decent Apparmor setup is really good for security.
                Flatpak is a shame and Android too: It lets Whatsapp and LinkedIn apps slurp all the contacts without even blinking. All Android sandboxing currently just suck.
                Only things like island work a little to isolate rogue apps. And nothing protect users from Google on Android.

                asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • maat@mastodon.socialM maat@mastodon.social

                  @asterisk @nixCraft Linux is not terrible at all if setup properly. A linux with a decent Apparmor setup is really good for security.
                  Flatpak is a shame and Android too: It lets Whatsapp and LinkedIn apps slurp all the contacts without even blinking. All Android sandboxing currently just suck.
                  Only things like island work a little to isolate rogue apps. And nothing protect users from Google on Android.

                  asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
                  asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
                  asterisk@social.linux.pizza
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @maat @nixCraft AppArmor and SELinux aren't really comparable to Android's ssndboxing model, which also handles app signing and certificate pinning.

                  Android's sandbox does not suck (bold of you to say when most Flatpaks can escape the sandbox by editing your .bashrc), Google just requires OEMs to bypass it for Play Services to obtain CTS certification (required to use the Android trademark). Alternate Android-based OSes are very secure (as long as they keep up with security patches, /e and iode do not). GrapheneOS's sandbox for it resolves this issue, letting you use it for apps that need it without security compromises.

                  A lot of Android's security also comes from verified boot (OS image is read-only and signed, bootloader checks the hash against the one burned in at manufacture or stored in the secure enclave at boot to ensure nothing is compromised) and a hardware secure enclave (which is not a TPM chip, its better)

                  edit: contact scopes (which GrapheneOS has had for ages) are coming in Android 17 to fix that issue.

                  maat@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

                    @nixCraft So you can't use Amazon Fire tables either?

                    That can be fun, lets see what Amazon does against this 😄

                    life_is@no-pony.farmL This user is from outside of this forum
                    life_is@no-pony.farmL This user is from outside of this forum
                    life_is@no-pony.farm
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22
                    @agowa338@chaos.social @nixCraft@mastodon.social amazon dropped fiteos already.
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA asterisk@social.linux.pizza

                      @maat @nixCraft AppArmor and SELinux aren't really comparable to Android's ssndboxing model, which also handles app signing and certificate pinning.

                      Android's sandbox does not suck (bold of you to say when most Flatpaks can escape the sandbox by editing your .bashrc), Google just requires OEMs to bypass it for Play Services to obtain CTS certification (required to use the Android trademark). Alternate Android-based OSes are very secure (as long as they keep up with security patches, /e and iode do not). GrapheneOS's sandbox for it resolves this issue, letting you use it for apps that need it without security compromises.

                      A lot of Android's security also comes from verified boot (OS image is read-only and signed, bootloader checks the hash against the one burned in at manufacture or stored in the secure enclave at boot to ensure nothing is compromised) and a hardware secure enclave (which is not a TPM chip, its better)

                      edit: contact scopes (which GrapheneOS has had for ages) are coming in Android 17 to fix that issue.

                      maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      maat@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @asterisk @nixCraft OK so the 16 first versions of Android did suck.
                      (By the way i hate flatpack principle so you can criticize itvall day i will just boredly agree)
                      And Google who wants to close Android platform and enforce the equivalent of Microsoft's Treacherous Computing Platform does suck even more.
                      Let's just degooglize this world... We'll breathe a better air.

                      asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • maat@mastodon.socialM maat@mastodon.social

                        @asterisk @nixCraft OK so the 16 first versions of Android did suck.
                        (By the way i hate flatpack principle so you can criticize itvall day i will just boredly agree)
                        And Google who wants to close Android platform and enforce the equivalent of Microsoft's Treacherous Computing Platform does suck even more.
                        Let's just degooglize this world... We'll breathe a better air.

                        asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
                        asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
                        asterisk@social.linux.pizza
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @maat @nixCraft They didn't suck, Google Play Services is what's always sucked (on stock play services can still access all your contacts as scopes are for third-party apps, get a Pixel or the upcoming Motorolas and flash Graphene on it if you'd like to restrict this and also regulate some other hidden permissions like Network and Sensors)

                        maat@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA asterisk@social.linux.pizza

                          @maat @nixCraft They didn't suck, Google Play Services is what's always sucked (on stock play services can still access all your contacts as scopes are for third-party apps, get a Pixel or the upcoming Motorolas and flash Graphene on it if you'd like to restrict this and also regulate some other hidden permissions like Network and Sensors)

                          maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maat@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @asterisk @nixCraft pixel = Google hardware = very little chance for me to buy that. Now grapheneos works on other hardware i light consider it as an option.

                          And let's agree to disagree : you will not change my mind about Android suckiness.

                          asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • maat@mastodon.socialM maat@mastodon.social

                            @asterisk @nixCraft pixel = Google hardware = very little chance for me to buy that. Now grapheneos works on other hardware i light consider it as an option.

                            And let's agree to disagree : you will not change my mind about Android suckiness.

                            asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
                            asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA This user is from outside of this forum
                            asterisk@social.linux.pizza
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @maat @nixCraft

                            The Titan M2 is good hardware. A relockable bootloader is a good feature. The 2027 Motorolas will support GrapheneOS when they come out as part of the new agreement.

                            Edit: your arguments are just unfounded is all I'm saying, Android is much better than Linux and you have no proof to the contrary.

                            maat@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • asterisk@social.linux.pizzaA asterisk@social.linux.pizza

                              @maat @nixCraft

                              The Titan M2 is good hardware. A relockable bootloader is a good feature. The 2027 Motorolas will support GrapheneOS when they come out as part of the new agreement.

                              Edit: your arguments are just unfounded is all I'm saying, Android is much better than Linux and you have no proof to the contrary.

                              maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maat@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maat@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @asterisk @nixCraft you gave no proof either.
                              A fully integrated patched tuned industrialized implementation cannot be comparés with « linux » in general which means nothing and everything.🙄
                              A linux installed and tuned by me on the desktop you will just be able to do what is allowed and nothing else.
                              I'm sure the same thing and better can be done by far more skilled linuxers than i am on mobiles with properly tailored linux systems.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khleedril@cyberplace.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @Random9 @nixCraft You just did.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                                  Google Broke reCAPTCHA for De-Googled Android Users https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users

                                  Google has tied its next-generation reCAPTCHA system to Google Play Services on Android, meaning anyone running a de-Googled phone will automatically fail verification when the system decides to challenge them. Another day another Google take over the world, open web and mobile ecosystems. This battle seems to be lost already because governments are ignoring shenanigans of Google.

                                  dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dheadshot@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @nixCraft Wait, so people without smartphones are blocked from viewing websites on their computers because they can't scan a QR code?!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups