We're happy to announce a long-term partnership with Motorola.

[ajkaestner@social.cologne]

How long we have to wait?
Can I buy phones with GrapheneOS installed?

[grapheneos@grapheneos.social]

@1a5cff5118d071a2c5d46534733abb9f3dcdfc41b24db0132fc20dbf01c75f78 It will be a specific subset of their devices with GrapheneOS support. The Motorola Signature (2026) and Motorola Razr Fold (2026) for recent devices which are close to meeting our requirements but not quite there. There's a lot of work to do for the next generation devices supporting GrapheneOS. We would have liked to support the 2026 devices but there wasn't enough time and Qualcomm's MTE support wasn't ready yet.

[ticho@mas.to]

@GrapheneOS Tell them to fix the misspelled "GrapehenOS" tag at the bottom of their article.

...unless there actually are some grape hens in the pipeline. Hey, no kink shaming!

[xtreix@infosec.exchange]

@GrapheneOS Carbon together strong !

[normjess@tech.lgbt]

@GrapheneOS Moto Analytics seems to run counter to your Privacy shtick

[lunareclipse@snug.moe]

@a53bdb @GrapheneOS now you can decide whether you're more worried about US backdoors or Chinese backdoors ​​

Honestly at this point the latter is probably more trustworthy ​​

[lunareclipse@snug.moe]

@a53bdb @GrapheneOS realistically whichever manufacturer has longer software support and easier to get repair parts is what I would go for.

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@skywalker2k17 @GrapheneOS

From what I've heard none of the 2026 devices from Moto made the cut.

[dangerdyke@social.translunar.academy]

@lunareclipse@snug.moe @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @a53bdb@mastodon.social at least the CCP won't send drone strikes after you

[mgorny@social.treehouse.systems]

@GrapheneOS, funny enough, I've just switched from Motorola to Pixels last year because their successive phones were becoming more and more crap, and on the models I've gotten LineageOS barely worked (like, to the point that you had to reboot the phone after every call). Hopefully direct GrapheneOS support will change that.

[lumi@snug.moe]

@GrapheneOS does this mean i will be able to get a degoogled motorola device in the future?

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@normjess @GrapheneOS ...first off, their shtick is security. That often leads to privacy but primarily their shtick is security.

second off, that's an enterprise product you'll probably not touch anyways. why do you care?

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@lumi @GrapheneOS

TL;DR: Yes.

[da_habakuk@fosstodon.org]

@GrapheneOS @debacle hopefully with better longterm updates than current motorola phones... then im in!

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@lumi @GrapheneOS

Well, as degoogled as using an OS maintained by Google gets

[sh@fed.hayfidelity.de]

@GrapheneOS Aaand Motorola is back on the map. Interesting project, I guess it brings #grapheneos a huge step forward.

[grapheneos@grapheneos.social]

@da_habakuk @debacle Motorola Signature (2026) already has a 7 year update commitment but doesn't quite meet our requirements yet. The future devices with GrapheneOS support will be even better than the improvements they already made for their 2026 flagships.

[lumi@snug.moe]

@alexia @GrapheneOS yeah, ofc the end goal is using a proper linux phone, to get maximal freedom and security

but having a degoogled android device is a step along the way. though i have been stuck at that step since around 2014

[joonq@mastodon.social]

@a53bdb @GrapheneOS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenovo but its chinese-american not chinese.

[bolomkxxviii@mastodon.social]

@GrapheneOS
As I understand the article, this will be aimed at corporate customers. I am hoping they will also sell to individuals and that the non-corporate customers will not have the analytics feature or it can be turned off. Motorola's problem has always been OS support. If GrapheneOS is handling support, it is a win for everyone.