We're happy to announce a long-term partnership with Motorola.

[kir@mastodon.uno]

@GrapheneOS This is huge!

[pietro395@mastodon.uno]

@GrapheneOS wow!

[skywalker2k17@nerdculture.de]

@GrapheneOS is the device still expected to roll out in 2027 or will it be towards the tail end of 2026?

[samuel_ps@mstdn.social]

@GrapheneOS can you already tell if pixel 11 phones will be supported? I'm really looking forward to this collab but just want to know what we can expect.

[greenpete@sunny.garden]

I trust @GrapheneOS but Motorola's 'operational insights' worries me...
#grapheneos #motorola

[a53bdb@mastodon.social]

@GrapheneOS Great job!
Btw you can get ready for answering flood of questions about why Motorola smartphone department belongs to a Chinese company called Lenovo.

[kharkerlake@karlsruhe-social.de]

@GrapheneOS Oh yes! Thank you! Just in time after OnePlus started to do strange things with their OS.

[ajkaestner@social.cologne]

How long we have to wait?
Can I buy phones with GrapheneOS installed?

[grapheneos@grapheneos.social]

@1a5cff5118d071a2c5d46534733abb9f3dcdfc41b24db0132fc20dbf01c75f78 It will be a specific subset of their devices with GrapheneOS support. The Motorola Signature (2026) and Motorola Razr Fold (2026) for recent devices which are close to meeting our requirements but not quite there. There's a lot of work to do for the next generation devices supporting GrapheneOS. We would have liked to support the 2026 devices but there wasn't enough time and Qualcomm's MTE support wasn't ready yet.

[ticho@mas.to]

@GrapheneOS Tell them to fix the misspelled "GrapehenOS" tag at the bottom of their article.

...unless there actually are some grape hens in the pipeline. Hey, no kink shaming!

[xtreix@infosec.exchange]

@GrapheneOS Carbon together strong !

[normjess@tech.lgbt]

@GrapheneOS Moto Analytics seems to run counter to your Privacy shtick

[lunareclipse@snug.moe]

@a53bdb @GrapheneOS now you can decide whether you're more worried about US backdoors or Chinese backdoors ​​

Honestly at this point the latter is probably more trustworthy ​​

[lunareclipse@snug.moe]

@a53bdb @GrapheneOS realistically whichever manufacturer has longer software support and easier to get repair parts is what I would go for.

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@skywalker2k17 @GrapheneOS

From what I've heard none of the 2026 devices from Moto made the cut.

[dangerdyke@social.translunar.academy]

@lunareclipse@snug.moe @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @a53bdb@mastodon.social at least the CCP won't send drone strikes after you

[mgorny@social.treehouse.systems]

@GrapheneOS, funny enough, I've just switched from Motorola to Pixels last year because their successive phones were becoming more and more crap, and on the models I've gotten LineageOS barely worked (like, to the point that you had to reboot the phone after every call). Hopefully direct GrapheneOS support will change that.

[lumi@snug.moe]

@GrapheneOS does this mean i will be able to get a degoogled motorola device in the future?

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@normjess @GrapheneOS ...first off, their shtick is security. That often leads to privacy but primarily their shtick is security.

second off, that's an enterprise product you'll probably not touch anyways. why do you care?

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@lumi @GrapheneOS

TL;DR: Yes.