Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Development & Open Source
  3. FOSS
  4. Edit: It will be through extensions, apparently.

Edit: It will be through extensions, apparently.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved FOSS
noailibreoffice
28 Posts 12 Posters 69 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

    @libreoffice @ashwin @paulk very glad to hear this! i am completely unimpressed with everyone making LLM plugins for emacs, but emacs itself continues to ensure it can be trusted by experts for decades of reliable usage. i'm glad to hear libreoffice's extension API is powerful enough to allow this (although an LLM plugin is basically the hello world of plugins).

    hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
    hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
    hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @libreoffice @ashwin @paulk is there a single "extension API" for libreoffice, or do specific tools like writer have their own extension APIs?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • bpeel@tech.lgbtB bpeel@tech.lgbt

      @paulk Is this article hallucinated by AI? The LibreOffice version numbers end in .2 and .8 (ie, released in February and August). 26.4 doesn’t exist. All discussions I’ve seen about integrating AI have always been very negative and the conclusion is that we should leave that up to optional extensions.

      naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
      naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
      naturemc@mastodon.online
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @bpeel @paulk This was exactly my idea, especially as I read the corrections made here in comments by @libreoffice
      The author of this article perhaps looked too deep into an,LLM to write it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • paulk@writing.exchangeP paulk@writing.exchange

        @libreoffice Thank you for correcting this. How odd that LinuxJournal reported on this.

        libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
        libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
        libreoffice@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @paulk Yes. We're very surprised too...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

          @ashwin @paulk There's no need for any fork because the article is misleading. First, there is no such thing at all as "LibreOffice 26.4 beta". The next major release will be LibreOffice 26.8, due to go into beta in early June. So the article author just invented that, apparently.

          And LibreOffice is not "introducing AI" into the software. There are no plans to put AI in LibreOffice. Some people are working on optional extensions.

          tanuki@neopaquita.esT This user is from outside of this forum
          tanuki@neopaquita.esT This user is from outside of this forum
          tanuki@neopaquita.es
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          @libreoffice Thanks, very good news, Indeed.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

            @ashwin @paulk There's no need for any fork because the article is misleading. First, there is no such thing at all as "LibreOffice 26.4 beta". The next major release will be LibreOffice 26.8, due to go into beta in early June. So the article author just invented that, apparently.

            And LibreOffice is not "introducing AI" into the software. There are no plans to put AI in LibreOffice. Some people are working on optional extensions.

            yala@degrowth.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
            yala@degrowth.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
            yala@degrowth.social
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            @libreoffice
            That's exciting to hear. Will the new LOOL be part of that release? For now we're building on the tiredofit container, but when available, we can switch and help testing.

            @ashwin @paulk

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

              @paulk This article is incorrect. There is no such thing as "LibreOffice 26.4 beta". And LibreOffice is not "introducing AI" in any way. Some community members are working on optional, separate extensions but that's another matter.

              firlefanz@writing.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
              firlefanz@writing.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
              firlefanz@writing.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              @libreoffice

              Thank you, that's a relief.

              @paulk

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
              • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

                @paulk This article is incorrect. There is no such thing as "LibreOffice 26.4 beta". And LibreOffice is not "introducing AI" in any way. Some community members are working on optional, separate extensions but that's another matter.

                housepanther@social.goblackcat.comH This user is from outside of this forum
                housepanther@social.goblackcat.comH This user is from outside of this forum
                housepanther@social.goblackcat.com
                wrote last edited by
                #27

                @libreoffice @paulk It is puzzling why The Linux Journal would publish something so patently misleading and wrong.

                libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • housepanther@social.goblackcat.comH housepanther@social.goblackcat.com

                  @libreoffice @paulk It is puzzling why The Linux Journal would publish something so patently misleading and wrong.

                  libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                  libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                  libreoffice@fosstodon.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #28

                  @housepanther @paulk Yes, exactly...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups