Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties.

A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
79 Posts 57 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • brucelawson@social.vivaldi.netB brucelawson@social.vivaldi.net

    A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/north-carolina-man-pleads-guilty-music-streaming-fraud-aided-artificial-intelligence-0 Is there a better metaphor for late-stage capitalism than burning resources to make songs that are never listened to, then steaming them to robots that will never hear them, ad infinitum?

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    spacelifeform@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #69

    @brucelawson

    Cheap way to generate ad revenue.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toriver@mas.toT toriver@mas.to

      @Amoshias @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson THE COURT SAID IT WAS. Why do you assume the corporation runs the court? What is your alternative to courts? Spotify is a shitty company but why defend this asshole just because the target was this company? What if the target was a small company instead?

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      amoshias@esq.social
      wrote last edited by
      #70

      @toriver @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson saying it in all caps doesn't make it true.

      the court did not say this. if you believe I am incorrect, please provide a citation.

      toriver@mas.toT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • brucelawson@social.vivaldi.netB brucelawson@social.vivaldi.net

        A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/north-carolina-man-pleads-guilty-music-streaming-fraud-aided-artificial-intelligence-0 Is there a better metaphor for late-stage capitalism than burning resources to make songs that are never listened to, then steaming them to robots that will never hear them, ad infinitum?

        oreoteeth@jawns.clubO This user is from outside of this forum
        oreoteeth@jawns.clubO This user is from outside of this forum
        oreoteeth@jawns.club
        wrote last edited by
        #71

        @brucelawson I can't prove it, but it's my deeply held belief that the tech bro social media sites use their proprietary AI to write bots in order to inflate traffic, and therefore ad revenue.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • brucelawson@social.vivaldi.netB brucelawson@social.vivaldi.net

          A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/north-carolina-man-pleads-guilty-music-streaming-fraud-aided-artificial-intelligence-0 Is there a better metaphor for late-stage capitalism than burning resources to make songs that are never listened to, then steaming them to robots that will never hear them, ad infinitum?

          nom@mk.spook.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          nom@mk.spook.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          nom@mk.spook.social
          wrote last edited by
          #72

          Maybe the computers liked streaming those tunes!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • brucelawson@social.vivaldi.netB brucelawson@social.vivaldi.net

            A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/north-carolina-man-pleads-guilty-music-streaming-fraud-aided-artificial-intelligence-0 Is there a better metaphor for late-stage capitalism than burning resources to make songs that are never listened to, then steaming them to robots that will never hear them, ad infinitum?

            hunterz@mastodon.sdf.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
            hunterz@mastodon.sdf.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
            hunterz@mastodon.sdf.org
            wrote last edited by
            #73

            @brucelawson https://youtu.be/wB1X4o-MV6o

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • brucelawson@social.vivaldi.netB brucelawson@social.vivaldi.net

              A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/north-carolina-man-pleads-guilty-music-streaming-fraud-aided-artificial-intelligence-0 Is there a better metaphor for late-stage capitalism than burning resources to make songs that are never listened to, then steaming them to robots that will never hear them, ad infinitum?

              htpcnz@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              htpcnz@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              htpcnz@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #74

              @brucelawson for the 8 million he got or potentially entitled to, you'd think he would hire a better lawyer than pleading guilty.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • brucelawson@social.vivaldi.netB brucelawson@social.vivaldi.net

                A man used LLMs to generate hundreds of thousands of "songs", then used bots to stream them billions of times, to collect $8m in royalties. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/north-carolina-man-pleads-guilty-music-streaming-fraud-aided-artificial-intelligence-0 Is there a better metaphor for late-stage capitalism than burning resources to make songs that are never listened to, then steaming them to robots that will never hear them, ad infinitum?

                williambob@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                williambob@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                williambob@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #75

                @brucelawson -Questions I have: Did comrade (a pronoun for the ages if ever heard) have a righteous nickname because folk heroes do arise when needed. Not Babyface as that one is long ago taken. DJ Fugazi Ears. And considering early download court cases made some flowers of youth to suicide, and the streaming companies follow standard Corporate Corporati policy where business has always raped art, shouldn't comrade go free. Many countries escaping incarceration is deemed natural, not punishable.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A amoshias@esq.social

                  @toriver @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson saying it in all caps doesn't make it true.

                  the court did not say this. if you believe I am incorrect, please provide a citation.

                  toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                  toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                  toriver@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #76

                  @Amoshias @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson The crime he was convicted for was "wire fraud". Which is usually used when someone commits fraud online. Seriously, are you angry the «business model» of siphoning what little Spotify gives artists into the fraudster’s pocket failed?

                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toriver@mas.toT toriver@mas.to

                    @Amoshias @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson The crime he was convicted for was "wire fraud". Which is usually used when someone commits fraud online. Seriously, are you angry the «business model» of siphoning what little Spotify gives artists into the fraudster’s pocket failed?

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    amoshias@esq.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #77

                    @toriver

                    okay, I think I understand what you're getting wrong. you aren't American, are you? you are fundamentally misunderstanding some things about our legal system. if you are interested, I will explain to you what you're getting wrong. if not, feel free to continue thinking you are right when you aren't 🙂

                    @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson

                    toriver@mas.toT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A amoshias@esq.social

                      @toriver

                      okay, I think I understand what you're getting wrong. you aren't American, are you? you are fundamentally misunderstanding some things about our legal system. if you are interested, I will explain to you what you're getting wrong. if not, feel free to continue thinking you are right when you aren't 🙂

                      @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson

                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      toriver@mas.to
                      wrote last edited by
                      #78

                      @Amoshias @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson No, I think you are worthy of a mute instead. You are basically trying to refute what the statement linked in the first post says. Trying to argue semantics when what he did is detailed there.

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toriver@mas.toT toriver@mas.to

                        @Amoshias @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson No, I think you are worthy of a mute instead. You are basically trying to refute what the statement linked in the first post says. Trying to argue semantics when what he did is detailed there.

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        amoshias@esq.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #79

                        @toriver

                        I asked you a very simple question, which was to actually support what you're saying with a citation. Because you're clearly not actually reading it. the linked page is a press release from the department of justice, not a court document. No court ruling was made in this case. the defendant pled guilty.

                        but instead of trying to understand where you are wrong or be less wrong, you're getting angry and blocking someone who is making you feel bad.

                        @WiteWulf @alessandro @brucelawson

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups