Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I want this but as a Linux distribution.

I want this but as a Linux distribution.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
132 Posts 74 Posters 26 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

    @itamarst Well, there is no universe where I would consider using 1password, but I guess that's still good to know

    glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    glyph@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    @mcc @itamarst it's a solidarity building exercise, now we can all be upset together

    glyph@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

      My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

      Internal server error · GitHub

      favicon

      (github.com)

      lingmops@topspicy.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lingmops@topspicy.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lingmops@topspicy.social
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      @mcc …shit

      wideeyedcurious@mstdn.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

        @mcc @itamarst it's a solidarity building exercise, now we can all be upset together

        glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        glyph@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @mcc @itamarst this is a bit tangential to the whole thing but that phrasing bothers me a LOT. "an essential part" — is it? is it "essential?" where was it five years ago? and three years from now, when everyone, even the most braindead useless dead-weight MBA executive, finally realizes that it doesn't fucking work at all, will it still be "essential" then? or is the plan to stop being successful?

        glyph@mastodon.socialG mcc@mastodon.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

          My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

          Internal server error · GitHub

          favicon

          (github.com)

          jcnotwit@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jcnotwit@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jcnotwit@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          @mcc Yeah, KeePassXC going this route really hurt. I'm probably going to migrate back to a text file encrypted with gnupg for basic password management, but I have no idea what I'm going to use for one-time passcodes.

          nekohayo@mastodon.socialN lhengstmengel@mastodon.nlL 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

            @mcc @itamarst this is a bit tangential to the whole thing but that phrasing bothers me a LOT. "an essential part" — is it? is it "essential?" where was it five years ago? and three years from now, when everyone, even the most braindead useless dead-weight MBA executive, finally realizes that it doesn't fucking work at all, will it still be "essential" then? or is the plan to stop being successful?

            glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            glyph@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @mcc @itamarst obviously this bothers me because it's a common trope at this point

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • lingmops@topspicy.socialL lingmops@topspicy.social

              @mcc …shit

              wideeyedcurious@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wideeyedcurious@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wideeyedcurious@mstdn.social
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @Lingmops @mcc I’m beginning to feel as if I’m gonna need to head back to just saving my pswds in a text file on my computer again. 🫤

              asymmetricblue@mastodon.socialA csolisr@hub.azkware.netC mozziediver@mastodon.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                @mcc @itamarst this is a bit tangential to the whole thing but that phrasing bothers me a LOT. "an essential part" — is it? is it "essential?" where was it five years ago? and three years from now, when everyone, even the most braindead useless dead-weight MBA executive, finally realizes that it doesn't fucking work at all, will it still be "essential" then? or is the plan to stop being successful?

                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcc@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @glyph @itamarst i'm assuming they'll go directly to "ah, we're already using it, so we can't back it out now" even in orgs where the primary driver of it being used was executive mandates that each employee use a certain number of AI tokens per month

                glyph@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                  @ariadne I am, in a flippant and general way, saying I want to eradicate all code with "AI code assistant" contributions from my computer and VPSes, but I do not currently know a way to do so. I keep having programs I previously installed add the poison after the fact without public notice. https://mastodon.social/@mcc/116110912928005524

                  Perhaps in future I will have to use Alpine Linux if that's how I get my code audited for no "AI" contributions.

                  mary@chaos.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mary@chaos.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mary@chaos.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @mcc @ariadne I have the same feeling, if something I use start accepting AI code assistant contributions, I am considering it the same way as any proprietary software.

                  On the subject of Bitwarden, it seems that Vaultwarden isn't accepting any AI contributions so far (would need to dig more into issues/PRs to be 100% sure), so I will likely fork bitwarden client or make my own client... 🙃

                  mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                    My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

                    Internal server error · GitHub

                    favicon

                    (github.com)

                    greyduck@wellduck.meG This user is from outside of this forum
                    greyduck@wellduck.meG This user is from outside of this forum
                    greyduck@wellduck.me
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @mcc I admit I don't know the KeePass ecosystem terribly well, but does this go "up the chain" to regular KeePass 2.x or is it just XC?

                    ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR just_one_bear@mastodon.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                      RE: https://mastodon.scot/@kim_harding/116108957641748718

                      I want this but as a Linux distribution. I don't think I'm asking for much here. I am just asking for the "open source community" to be to the left of Goldman Sachs

                      brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brett_e_carlock@mastodon.online
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      @mcc I am dropping/switching any FOSS tools that I know are using GenAI/LLMs and it is getting bleak -_-

                      mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                        My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

                        Internal server error · GitHub

                        favicon

                        (github.com)

                        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mcc@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        RE: https://wellduck.me/@greyduck/116110983001607000

                        I would like the answer to this question as well.

                        djm62@beige.partyD elfin@mstdn.socialE 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • mary@chaos.socialM mary@chaos.social

                          @mcc @ariadne I have the same feeling, if something I use start accepting AI code assistant contributions, I am considering it the same way as any proprietary software.

                          On the subject of Bitwarden, it seems that Vaultwarden isn't accepting any AI contributions so far (would need to dig more into issues/PRs to be 100% sure), so I will likely fork bitwarden client or make my own client... 🙃

                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @mary @ariadne That's interesting but as you say, vaultwarden without the client is… there's not a way to use it is there?

                          mary@chaos.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB brett_e_carlock@mastodon.online

                            @mcc I am dropping/switching any FOSS tools that I know are using GenAI/LLMs and it is getting bleak -_-

                            mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mcc@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @Brett_E_Carlock the problem is removing any one tool from my life is a relatively large time investment and projects are adding "boycott me" flags faster than I can switch to or create alternatives

                            brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                              @glyph @itamarst i'm assuming they'll go directly to "ah, we're already using it, so we can't back it out now" even in orgs where the primary driver of it being used was executive mandates that each employee use a certain number of AI tokens per month

                              glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              glyph@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #25

                              @mcc @itamarst my prediction is that they will pretend that once there are a few more truly catastrophic stories in the press, like if a whistleblower shows up to conclusively prove that Microsoft *knows* copilot is causing all the Windows bugs that everyone suspects it is, they will simply change the copy on their website to indicate that they were always against this and they were never fooled, and there will not be consequences for anyone involved

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                @Brett_E_Carlock the problem is removing any one tool from my life is a relatively large time investment and projects are adding "boycott me" flags faster than I can switch to or create alternatives

                                brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                brett_e_carlock@mastodon.online
                                wrote last edited by
                                #26

                                @mcc Yeah, absolutely. Thankfully so far these changes have all been low-stakes for me, but they are disruptive none-the-less.

                                As a fairly recent full time Linux everywhere user, something as stupid as changing my music manager app was a pretty significant shakeup. Twice, back to back, no less, after finally settling on each one. Enough that I had to package an entirely different media manager to use, since I had no other options I remotely enjoyed using.

                                Again, whinging, but the pattern holds

                                brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • greyduck@wellduck.meG greyduck@wellduck.me

                                  @mcc I admit I don't know the KeePass ecosystem terribly well, but does this go "up the chain" to regular KeePass 2.x or is it just XC?

                                  ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ratsnakegames@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @greyduck @mcc probably best to ask Mr Reichel here: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/discussion/329220/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                    My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

                                    Internal server error · GitHub

                                    favicon

                                    (github.com)

                                    reijomancer@defcon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    reijomancer@defcon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    reijomancer@defcon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @mcc Canceled my subscription, told them why and now am deciding on if I even want to keep my own vaultwarden instance.

                                    I can't trust the clients anymore, so i'm freezing updates to the apps - but that's a security time-bomb in and of itself.

                                    Guess I'm doing a forced password manager migration in 2026 as well.

                                    Thank you (and fuck them) for the information. I'm slightly annoyed that this is the first i've heard of it and Bitwarden published some BS about being all-in on agentic foolishness late last year.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB brett_e_carlock@mastodon.online

                                      @mcc Yeah, absolutely. Thankfully so far these changes have all been low-stakes for me, but they are disruptive none-the-less.

                                      As a fairly recent full time Linux everywhere user, something as stupid as changing my music manager app was a pretty significant shakeup. Twice, back to back, no less, after finally settling on each one. Enough that I had to package an entirely different media manager to use, since I had no other options I remotely enjoyed using.

                                      Again, whinging, but the pattern holds

                                      brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      brett_e_carlock@mastodon.online
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @mcc Low-stakes, and I have options.

                                      What about for more significant/critical tools for folks? What about when there aren't real options?

                                      What about for folks that can't just build and package something else?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                        My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

                                        Internal server error · GitHub

                                        favicon

                                        (github.com)

                                        luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        luana@wetdry.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @mcc oh yikes wtf please not bitwarden

                                        nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                          @ariadne I am, in a flippant and general way, saying I want to eradicate all code with "AI code assistant" contributions from my computer and VPSes, but I do not currently know a way to do so. I keep having programs I previously installed add the poison after the fact without public notice. https://mastodon.social/@mcc/116110912928005524

                                          Perhaps in future I will have to use Alpine Linux if that's how I get my code audited for no "AI" contributions.

                                          luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          luana@wetdry.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @mcc @ariadne hmmm there’s probably some really awful way to hack this into NixOS if you want to compile your whole system

                                          xarvos@outerheaven.clubX 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups