Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. STOP. SENDING. SURVEYS. FROM.

STOP. SENDING. SURVEYS. FROM.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
62 Posts 41 Posters 84 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

    STOP. SENDING. SURVEYS. FROM. THIRD. PARTY. SERVICES.

    It looks sus as ducks having something from randomsurvey.co.uk come through on behalf of YourCompany with every domain/link in the email having no obvious link to it. Rarely is there a single link to the company domain, with everything pointing to the that of the commissioned survey provider.

    To me it sets off every damn alarm bell for a phishing attempt. Expecting customers to use it encourages unsafe practices.

    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #53

    @babe Every cloud platform makes me rage for this. yourorganization.whoeverythisis.com being the pattern everyone should just trust and use SSO with?

    Or Microsoft which thinks a single Teams workflow should have a user connect to teams.microsoft.com, my.sharepoint.com, planner.cloud.microsoft, and login.microsoftonline.com and hope users will still notice a lookalike phishing domain.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

      There is another element to this that companies don't seem to consider:

      If you use third party services for surveys, marketing etc, and you tell customers that yes, they are legitimate, not to worry. What's stopping a scammer from copying these emails and sending them from servicenames similar to the legitimate third party vendor?

      mikaeleiman@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mikaeleiman@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mikaeleiman@mastodon.sdf.org
      wrote last edited by
      #54

      @babe but… that would be RUDE!?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

        FILL OUT THIS SURVEY FOR A FINANCIAL REWARD! is even worse. You're offering remuneration to customers for the watering down of their good security practices.

        nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #55

        @babe Thank you for "remuneration." I hear people say "renumeration" all the time and it drives me nuts. Like, well known people, commentators and such, who should know better.

        babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB dakkar@s.thenautilus.netD 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

          There is another element to this that companies don't seem to consider:

          If you use third party services for surveys, marketing etc, and you tell customers that yes, they are legitimate, not to worry. What's stopping a scammer from copying these emails and sending them from servicenames similar to the legitimate third party vendor?

          timmy@goblin.campT This user is from outside of this forum
          timmy@goblin.campT This user is from outside of this forum
          timmy@goblin.camp
          wrote last edited by
          #56

          @babe i bought a car and the dealership pre-scheduled maintenance appointments for me, without telling me about this at all. They sent a link to my phone from an unfamiliar 5 digit number, not affiliated with the dealership or manufacturer. i fully ignored it thinking it was a scam text. In Ohio, registration is public record so scammers love to buy the reg records so they know your exact car down to the full VIN

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchangeN nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchange

            @babe Thank you for "remuneration." I hear people say "renumeration" all the time and it drives me nuts. Like, well known people, commentators and such, who should know better.

            babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
            babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
            babe@glitterkitten.co.uk
            wrote last edited by
            #57

            @Nonya_Bidniss One of the common cornerstones of an autodidact's education is being a wordsy bitch. I'd kick myself if I got it wrong!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchangeN nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchange

              @babe Thank you for "remuneration." I hear people say "renumeration" all the time and it drives me nuts. Like, well known people, commentators and such, who should know better.

              dakkar@s.thenautilus.netD This user is from outside of this forum
              dakkar@s.thenautilus.netD This user is from outside of this forum
              dakkar@s.thenautilus.net
              wrote last edited by
              #58

              @Nonya_Bidniss@infosec.exchange at a previous job, we had a database table called renumeration, it confused everyone
              it didn't even track salaries! (I think it tracked money we owed to clients)
              @babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • missnfranchised@glitterkitten.co.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                missnfranchised@glitterkitten.co.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                missnfranchised@glitterkitten.co.uk
                wrote last edited by
                #59

                @lesbianhacker @babe Training worked then.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

                  STOP. SENDING. SURVEYS. FROM. THIRD. PARTY. SERVICES.

                  It looks sus as ducks having something from randomsurvey.co.uk come through on behalf of YourCompany with every domain/link in the email having no obvious link to it. Rarely is there a single link to the company domain, with everything pointing to the that of the commissioned survey provider.

                  To me it sets off every damn alarm bell for a phishing attempt. Expecting customers to use it encourages unsafe practices.

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #60

                  @babe My own company sends out internal emails that are more like phish than any real one. Sender: not in our global address book. Subject line: You are overdue for training. Body: Click on this PDF file for details.

                  I sent it to our security folks (it's a big company), and they said, "If it isn't marked "External" it's safe. Uh, where were you in 2010 when our email servers were being run by the Chinese MSS?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

                    There is another element to this that companies don't seem to consider:

                    If you use third party services for surveys, marketing etc, and you tell customers that yes, they are legitimate, not to worry. What's stopping a scammer from copying these emails and sending them from servicenames similar to the legitimate third party vendor?

                    cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cazabon@mindly.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #61

                    @babe

                    I've tried to get this through to companies like, for instance, my bank, with little success.

                    Before I finally managed to "opt out" of the last of their marketing / promotional email, I would get two kinds of messages from them:

                    1) Regular reminders of secure practice, and how you can't trust who an email comes from, and you should therefore never, ever click a link in an email claiming to be from them.

                    2) Constant spam for their products and services, all replete with links to follow to get them. These mails all came through outside agencies, from Mailchimp or similar, and with all the links going through a click tracker in some random advertising company's domain.

                    I couldn't even get their two departments to talk to each other about this.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

                      STOP. SENDING. SURVEYS. FROM. THIRD. PARTY. SERVICES.

                      It looks sus as ducks having something from randomsurvey.co.uk come through on behalf of YourCompany with every domain/link in the email having no obvious link to it. Rarely is there a single link to the company domain, with everything pointing to the that of the commissioned survey provider.

                      To me it sets off every damn alarm bell for a phishing attempt. Expecting customers to use it encourages unsafe practices.

                      mikebabcock@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mikebabcock@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mikebabcock@floss.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #62

                      @babe disagree. I would rather pay a payments company than your own website I can't audit and I'd rather do surveys at a known survey site than through your domain.
                      Trust within a domain matters.
                      #sysadmin #cybersecurity

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups