The message from Europeans is clear: children deserve a digital world where they can grow up free, safe and protected.

[samueljohnson@mstdn.social]

@The_Universality @proscience @penguinrebellion @EUCommission Thanks for your clarification. The EU has its faults and there have been corrupt and dishonest individuals in parliament and elsewhere, but to dismiss the entire EU as corrupt is simply wrong. It's currently the only organization on earth capable of regulating big tech, in Europe at least.

[inctail@infosec.exchange]

@EUCommission

Then maybe address it the right way, you write the following:

the negative impact of social media on their mental health (93%),
cyberbullying and online harassment (92%)

These two are addressed if you go after the real problem, Big tech and their algorithms, not restrict citizens rights by making us send more information to them.

assuring mechanisms to restrict age in appropriate content (92%).

This is plain and simple parenting, all my children have iPhones, none of them have social media because I speak to them about the issues and set boundaries, now none of them want it.

[the_universality@mastodon.novotnykrystof.com]

@samueljohnson @proscience @penguinrebellion @EUCommission
Indeed. I didn't meant to suggest dismissing the EU as corrupt. If it seemed that way, excuse my phrasing.

As for the ability to regulate big tech, I wouldn't be that optimistic.

(Not all things are verified)
https://rebalance-now.de/en/von-der-leyen-halts-billions-dollar-fine-against-google-criticism-from-parliament-and-civil-society/

[samueljohnson@mstdn.social]

@The_Universality @proscience @penguinrebellion @EUCommission I am also not optimistic about the EU's *willingness* to regulate big tech. Willingness and ability are not the same thing.

Apart from anything else the EU is currently constrained by matters of timing and circumstances may change later this year.

[riley@toot.cat]

@killick You know, if we kept dangerous sillionaires off the Internet, it could be as safe to kids as it used to be before Bocefaak.

@EUCommission

[basiep@fosstodon.org]

@EUCommission
Parents are responsible. Not companies.
Also, digital safety doesn't allow for mass surveillance (called age verification)

[neongod@mstdn.social]

@EUCommission You could dismantle the whole attention economy by making it impossible to offer their services for free while making their users the product. Just by regulation, without any tech.

If for-profit social media would not be free, most kids would have no access. In fact, most adults would stop wasting their life there too. It would not only solve child safety, but make everyone’s life better. Without the need for age verification and building a surveillance state.

[ryoma123@livellosegreto.it]

@EUCommission Avete toccato un tasto che qui, sul fediverso, non dovevate toccare.

[corbden@defcon.social]

@EUCommission Regulate companies not people.

[jakekb@mastodon.social]

@EUCommission @gnemmi Then why did Ursula von der Leyen scrap a fine to Google last week without any explanation? How is that holding them accountable for violating dsa?

[xjki@mastodon.social]

@EUCommission All is good but age verification systems are not the solution.

[brobot90001@mastodon.online]

@EUCommission

Except that isn’t! You are actively assisting big tech with this move.

Asking children and adults to identify themselves online isn't holding big tech companies responsible!

Verifying who everyone is with government ids is not a solution. It’s a massive data breach waiting to happen.

You are enabling much much more harm to children and everyone using the internet by pushing this narrative of verification.
#chatcontrol #idverification #privacy #eu

[cid_terron@social.linux.pizza]

@EUCommission very high. Good.
You've made quite a few laws ensuring child safety.
Let's consider a law successful if children are safe.
Have the unsuccessful tries been revoked and the incompetent supporters been removed?
No - you definitely should. Child safety is important. But I consider abusing children for mass surveillance as child abuse.

[rhoot@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@EUCommission by providing a method to verify that a person is an adult, you are implicitly also adding a method for bad actors to verify that someone is underage, and someone they can take advantage of. The only safe solution is for sites to know less about their visitors, not more.

[moinoviimir@hachyderm.io]

@EUCommission seriously, stop it with the age verification bs. Hold tech companies accountable without this glaring privacy violation. This is not what Europe wants to be known for.

[eobet@oldbytes.space]

@EUCommission oh, right... this you just a few days ago?

Just admit that you expect climate breakdown induced food shortages to incite widespread mass protests and you need fascist aligned surveillance tools to control the populations when that happens, all because you weakened environmental protection rules to placate corporations owned by the billionaire class so you could meet short term cancerous economic growth demands!

Von der Leyen Halts Billions-Dollar Fine Against Google – Criticism from Parliament and Civil Society - Rebalance Now

Ursula von der Leyen has halted a previously planned multibillion-euro fine against Google at the last minute. In an open letter released today, more than 30 organizations are calling on the Commission President to impose the fine promptly and thus effectively enforce the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

Rebalance Now (rebalance-now.de)

[castrillo@mastodon.online]

@EUCommission no need to add my comment to share what I think about it. I think you guys know that this is NOT a solution, nor is it close to being anything like a "solution"