Neutral perspective about the case.
-
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@skinnylatte/116178918067111125
Neutral perspective about the case.
Proton, as an organization, has to follow the law and the Swiss court decided that MLAT is valid and Proton should provide information. Every organization and company has to do it. Of course, Proton can say "we don't follow the law", but then the organization will be out of business and executives could be criminally liable for breaching laws.
No contents of emails were provided as Proton cannot access them, which this case only confirms. Payment data or recovery data can be provided, following order issued by a Swiss court.
Another note: Organizations, including companies, and individuals have to comply with laws and court orders of their legal jurisdiction.
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
