Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Alan Turing was a visionary.

Alan Turing was a visionary.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
69 Posts 26 Posters 31 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN noplasticshower@infosec.exchange

    @ireneista @raymaccarthy @futurebird Eliza and LLM models based on transformers are not at all the same. One of the first programs I typed in in 1980 was Eliza. Keyword matching and canned response is not prediction.

    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
    wrote last edited by
    #42

    @noplasticshower @ireneista @futurebird
    No, they don't work the same. However that doesn't matter. I suggested the biggest limitation of the originals was the built in data, The current ones are still amusing toys and it's a scam on investors and users to claim they are actually useful. It's hype and self-delusion.

    noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      @ireneista

      The problem with developing a "test for conciseness" is we do not have a definition for what it is that would allow such a test to work with other people who we can presume to be conscious (if conciseness can be well defined)

      I think we should retreat to simpler questions. Here is one:

      Is it possible for pain and suffering to exist without conciseness?

      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #43

      @futurebird @ireneista oh yes. Pain is just a damage signal tied to specific, rather urgent "get away from the damage" incentives. Consciousness, as far as I can tell from my kindergarten level understanding, is probably a sort of mental reflection function?

      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social

        @futurebird @ireneista oh yes. Pain is just a damage signal tied to specific, rather urgent "get away from the damage" incentives. Consciousness, as far as I can tell from my kindergarten level understanding, is probably a sort of mental reflection function?

        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
        wrote last edited by
        #44

        @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird the question is complicated by the fact that many attempts to define "consciousness" describe things that humans don't even do

        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

          @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird the question is complicated by the fact that many attempts to define "consciousness" describe things that humans don't even do

          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
          wrote last edited by
          #45

          @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird it seems like a topic that it should be possible to study seriously, and we've read research that is making serious efforts, but none of it has felt persuasive to us

          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

            @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird it seems like a topic that it should be possible to study seriously, and we've read research that is making serious efforts, but none of it has felt persuasive to us

            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
            ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
            wrote last edited by
            #46

            @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird people just bring an awful lot of preconceptions about it, which makes it really hard to talk about

            somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

              @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird the question is complicated by the fact that many attempts to define "consciousness" describe things that humans don't even do

              somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #47

              @ireneista @futurebird the reading I've done on consciousness was fascinating - the fact that it comes significantly *after* our reactions to things, and provides a thought train that justifies those reactions, was wild to learn.

              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social

                @ireneista @futurebird the reading I've done on consciousness was fascinating - the fact that it comes significantly *after* our reactions to things, and provides a thought train that justifies those reactions, was wild to learn.

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                wrote last edited by
                #48

                @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird yes for sure!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                  wrote last edited by
                  #49

                  @tiotasram @ireneista @futurebird
                  It's not really a test because it's absolutely subjective and there is no scoring criteria.
                  You know how many "romances" written for women by people with female pen names are actually so? Maybe 70%. The idea of convincingly playing a gender role is nothing to do with computer programs. It's a worthless thought experiment. Many are actually read by men too. Chicklit is a demeaning phrase.
                  People have done it perfectly, badly and deliberately as entertainment.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                    @ireneista @futurebird
                    The Turing Test (not a real test) was never serious.
                    Alan Turing died in 1954. Chess, thought originally to need AI, didn't. He wrote one of the first.
                    The Eliza Chatbot was developed 1964 to 1967.
                    13 yrs?
                    The main limitation was that the data could not easily be extended. It "passed" the Touring test for some naïve users. The Doctor version is in Linux emacs. Run it, hit escape, type x and then type doctor.
                    The current LLMs have huge datasets, so seem more realistic.

                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    carl@chaos.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #50

                    @raymaccarthy Side remark: Alan Turing killed himself because the laws against homosexuality were enforced against him. We should take the time to use that memory to keep fighting against fascist laws. @ireneista @futurebird

                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                      @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk @futurebird people just bring an awful lot of preconceptions about it, which makes it really hard to talk about

                      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #51

                      @ireneista @futurebird for brain funsies, I really liked "the power of habit" and "the man who mistook his wife for a hat"

                      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C carl@chaos.social

                        @raymaccarthy Side remark: Alan Turing killed himself because the laws against homosexuality were enforced against him. We should take the time to use that memory to keep fighting against fascist laws. @ireneista @futurebird

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #52

                        @carl @raymaccarthy @futurebird oh MOST DEFINITELY

                        some of the younger queer people on here have come up with the slogan "make sure to be extremely gay on the computer or Alan Turing died for nothing".

                        it's not, like... we have some professional/activist experience in designing slogans and that's not one we'd have picked, there are many problems with it, but it sure does speak to an emotional truth.

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                          @carl @raymaccarthy @futurebird oh MOST DEFINITELY

                          some of the younger queer people on here have come up with the slogan "make sure to be extremely gay on the computer or Alan Turing died for nothing".

                          it's not, like... we have some professional/activist experience in designing slogans and that's not one we'd have picked, there are many problems with it, but it sure does speak to an emotional truth.

                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #53

                          @carl @raymaccarthy @futurebird it's history everyone should know. powerfully, powerfully relevant to today.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C carl@chaos.social

                            @raymaccarthy Side remark: Alan Turing killed himself because the laws against homosexuality were enforced against him. We should take the time to use that memory to keep fighting against fascist laws. @ireneista @futurebird

                            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                            wrote last edited by
                            #54

                            @carl @ireneista @futurebird
                            That's true, even if in fact he poisoned himself by accident. Look up electroplating with gold; it seems to have been a hobby. Cyanide based chemicals.

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                              @noplasticshower @ireneista @futurebird
                              No, they don't work the same. However that doesn't matter. I suggested the biggest limitation of the originals was the built in data, The current ones are still amusing toys and it's a scam on investors and users to claim they are actually useful. It's hype and self-delusion.

                              noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                              noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                              noplasticshower@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #55

                              @raymaccarthy @ireneista @futurebird I am sorry, but I disagree with your characterization. And yes, I work on this directly and with a great deal of scientific skepticism (see https://berryvilleiml.com/). I wrote my first neural network 9 years after Eliza in 1989 and trained it to beat along with music.

                              There are many reasons that LLMs are like models of alien intelligence because they are not like us. But they are more like us than Eliza with a huge database. Lol.

                              raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                                @carl @ireneista @futurebird
                                That's true, even if in fact he poisoned himself by accident. Look up electroplating with gold; it seems to have been a hobby. Cyanide based chemicals.

                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                carl@chaos.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #56

                                @raymaccarthy Even if. But no serious source fabricated Turing’s suicide as accident. @ireneista @futurebird

                                raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social

                                  @ireneista @futurebird for brain funsies, I really liked "the power of habit" and "the man who mistook his wife for a hat"

                                  somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #57

                                  @ireneista @futurebird the saddest thing I have learned recently is that a number of people who vote have no idea that the brain is what you use to think with. They literally don't grasp that brains are *you*. It explained a lot to me.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN noplasticshower@infosec.exchange

                                    @raymaccarthy @ireneista @futurebird I am sorry, but I disagree with your characterization. And yes, I work on this directly and with a great deal of scientific skepticism (see https://berryvilleiml.com/). I wrote my first neural network 9 years after Eliza in 1989 and trained it to beat along with music.

                                    There are many reasons that LLMs are like models of alien intelligence because they are not like us. But they are more like us than Eliza with a huge database. Lol.

                                    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #58

                                    @noplasticshower @ireneista @futurebird
                                    That's totally delusional that they are like an alien intelligence because they are not like us.
                                    Even the phrase "neural network" is a deliberate lie. The word "trained" is actually misleading.
                                    Also we have no idea what actual aliens are like, but we have studied chimps, rooks, dolphins, dogs, horses, cats and octopuses (which are very odd).

                                    noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C carl@chaos.social

                                      @raymaccarthy Even if. But no serious source fabricated Turing’s suicide as accident. @ireneista @futurebird

                                      raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #59

                                      @carl @ireneista @futurebird
                                      I don't think it was an accident, obviously he had access to nasty stuff.
                                      I was writing that, even if it was, we still need to totally oppose fascism.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                        Alan Turing was a visionary. Super-perceptive computer scientist and it annoys me to no end that what he's most famous for outside of computer science is the "Turing Test."

                                        He gave one of the first and most succinct accounts of how a computer should work and they still work that way to this very hour as I type.

                                        Talk about Turing Machines more and Turing Tests less.

                                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gmsizemore@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #60

                                        @futurebird Well...he did just about single-handedly win WWII...

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                                          @noplasticshower @ireneista @futurebird
                                          That's totally delusional that they are like an alien intelligence because they are not like us.
                                          Even the phrase "neural network" is a deliberate lie. The word "trained" is actually misleading.
                                          Also we have no idea what actual aliens are like, but we have studied chimps, rooks, dolphins, dogs, horses, cats and octopuses (which are very odd).

                                          noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          noplasticshower@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #61

                                          @raymaccarthy @ireneista @futurebird ok. Nevermind.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups