please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I understood that many people might be forced to engage with them on a daily basis, because their company has bought into the hype. The results so far are actually better than I expected
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I put not at all because it's the most accurate. I've used one twice ever. Both times I decided to see if I could social engineer (for lack of better words) ChatGPT into claiming to be sentient to see if there was anything to the claims. Both times, I didn't know the full extent of how unethical their development was or that people were being driven to psychosis by their sycophancy. I haven't touched one since early 2024 mostly for those reasons. It didn't feel worth it to keep poking it like that and the push for them to be in everything left an even worse taste in my mouth.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial
Not at all for personal use, but all my day job work goes through a chatbot. It's not optional and I haven't found a better job yet. -
@falcennial @Rhodium103 I'm also going to interpret "telling customer service chatbot to fuck off and get me an actual customer service representative" as not counting as "chatting".
@dalias @falcennial @Rhodium103 Shit, idk if what I put is accurate then, because there were a few times where the support didn't say it was an LLM but I'm pretty sure in hindsight the website forced me to engage with an LLM
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial for work, often. almost never on my own.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
oh I've been talking to mine almost daily lately, it's become a weird habit tbh. curious to see how the poll turns out!
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial@mastodon.social I voted "not at all" since last time was several months ago. even if I didn't find them morally questionable, I just have very little use for LLMs. the one thing they're useful for is looking up stuff using vague descriptors, and … I just don't need that very often.
-
@mensrea@freeradical.zone @falcennial@mastodon.social @indigoparadox@mastodon.social mojeek.com is more like old search engines used to be. suffers a bit from having a relatively small dataset, but it's really good for if you have precise search parameters for something not entirely obscure.
-
@dalias @falcennial @Rhodium103 Shit, idk if what I put is accurate then, because there were a few times where the support didn't say it was an LLM but I'm pretty sure in hindsight the website forced me to engage with an LLM
@disorderlyf @falcennial @Rhodium103 I don't think any attempt at communicating where you're being deceived into it counts as "chatting with a chatbot".
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
It would be really
interesting to repeat this exact survey in a year's time and see what changes. -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I don't know what you want to know. I use it, maybe once or twice a week, but I don't chat with it. I ask him help on some program, but that's not a chat - it simply can't be.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial The only use I've found for it is literally for searching the web. Google search, as we all know, has become absolutely wretched. I wish I could do better with DDG or Startpage, but sadly, I don't get any super useful results there either. Most of the time with an LLM, I get the exact link with the info I need.. I just tell it go find this on the web, give me the link, don't summarize. I get my link and I'm on my way. It Googles (the verb) better than Google.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I use quite a lot to practice conversation in Korean. For me it is useful to practice other languages.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I don't know what LLM is.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial the closest I've come to a "chat" was asking Chat-GPT to "Create a Sherlock Holmes based character that Commander Data couldn't beat." It dutifully complied.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I do not "chat" but I can't avoid "google whatever they call it" at $work, ie click and on link it provides.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial @rysiek Unfortunately, the place I work at forces me to vote for the last option.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Never used it for any conversation, felt that was boring and a privacy risk.
Only used it for synthesizing data and coding assistant. -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial But I never chat with an LLM. I ask it to assemble some data for me, seveal times a week. BUT by writing a badly defined question, you get badly understood results.
