if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
-
if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
-
if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
@joe stare
-
if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
@joe "The GCC countries" being a phrase you see daily in the news is still confusing my brain.
-
if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
@joe would pair well with the Large Language -- er -- LLVM toolkit
-
if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
@joe it’s all fun and games until someone forks it to add an Enhanced Garbage Collection System (EGCS)
-
if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
@joe Well GGC already exists as a garbage collected C; it is part of GCC :).
/me runs.
-
if pizlo really wanted to troll with his memory safe garbage collected C implementation, he should have called it GC-C
@joe GC-C, the great regional rival of the Intel Research Garbage Collector
-
@joe GC-C, the great regional rival of the Intel Research Garbage Collector
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
