Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Listen.

"Listen.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
22 Posts 16 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    @Tamtam

    For years I thought that was the driving idea behind many US military actions. If not oil then some other form of economic profiteering.

    I have come to *reject* this. The notion it is "if not moral at least it is profitable" gives them too much credit.

    War profiteering is a fleeting, inefficient way to build wealth. Objectively? They destroy wealth.

    They don't care about having "more" but rather "more than the other guy"

    lily_and_frog@mastodon.artL This user is from outside of this forum
    lily_and_frog@mastodon.artL This user is from outside of this forum
    lily_and_frog@mastodon.art
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @futurebird @Tamtam

    US foreign policy is based on two things:

    1. US power is based on US buying power and *overconsumption*.
    2. Even right wing hawks know, despite denials, that Earth's resources are finite.

    So the aim of US foreign policy is to stop any potential rival to match US's (and key allies') levels of consumption. Even more so if they have an economic model other than capitalism.

    Doesn't matter if wars are "won" or "lost", all what matters is hindering development.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      @Tamtam

      For years I thought that was the driving idea behind many US military actions. If not oil then some other form of economic profiteering.

      I have come to *reject* this. The notion it is "if not moral at least it is profitable" gives them too much credit.

      War profiteering is a fleeting, inefficient way to build wealth. Objectively? They destroy wealth.

      They don't care about having "more" but rather "more than the other guy"

      alper@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      alper@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      alper@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @futurebird @Tamtam
      Spite is as powerful as it is subtle as a human drive. It hides behind others in many cases. It's the deadliest 8th sin never even mentioned.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        "Listen. I know that no one has explained how dropping these bombs makes any sense but somehow if they didn't do it the US would be weaker or something might happen and you'd get attacked by a terrorist in the Ohio carpark or suddenly there would be no jobs and you'd be poor. Trust us bro."

        At least a third of this country falls for this over and over and over.

        I have another theory.

        What if it's not important and it's just some wealthy people settling scores that have nothing to do with us?

        spacemagick@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        spacemagick@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        spacemagick@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @futurebird
        It's difficult to imagine how the US could possibly appear any weaker than it already does, given that it's crass clueless infinitely blackmailable gangster boss puppet leader is obviously being run by the country's traditional enemy.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          "Listen. I know that no one has explained how dropping these bombs makes any sense but somehow if they didn't do it the US would be weaker or something might happen and you'd get attacked by a terrorist in the Ohio carpark or suddenly there would be no jobs and you'd be poor. Trust us bro."

          At least a third of this country falls for this over and over and over.

          I have another theory.

          What if it's not important and it's just some wealthy people settling scores that have nothing to do with us?

          kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kevinrns@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @futurebird

          People are saying maybe the Saudis hired trump personally, to direct the US military to hit Saudis long-term enemy Iran.

          energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kevinrns@mstdn.socialK kevinrns@mstdn.social

            @futurebird

            People are saying maybe the Saudis hired trump personally, to direct the US military to hit Saudis long-term enemy Iran.

            energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
            energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
            energisch_@troet.cafe
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @kevinrns @futurebird He might get another aeroplane for it, who knows.

            fondoffawns@nerdculture.deF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe

              @kevinrns @futurebird He might get another aeroplane for it, who knows.

              fondoffawns@nerdculture.deF This user is from outside of this forum
              fondoffawns@nerdculture.deF This user is from outside of this forum
              fondoffawns@nerdculture.de
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @energisch_ @kevinrns @futurebird Qatar with the plane, UAE with the billions in crypto, bought the use of the US military from tRump, to strike their enemy.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                @Tamtam

                For years I thought that was the driving idea behind many US military actions. If not oil then some other form of economic profiteering.

                I have come to *reject* this. The notion it is "if not moral at least it is profitable" gives them too much credit.

                War profiteering is a fleeting, inefficient way to build wealth. Objectively? They destroy wealth.

                They don't care about having "more" but rather "more than the other guy"

                laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                laukidh@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @futurebird @Tamtam also, we recognized our dependence on foreign oil and have become a net exporter.

                We don’t need anyone else’s oil. A couple seized tankers doesn’t come close to what we’ve spent on this.

                tamtam@mastodon.deT 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                  "Listen. I know that no one has explained how dropping these bombs makes any sense but somehow if they didn't do it the US would be weaker or something might happen and you'd get attacked by a terrorist in the Ohio carpark or suddenly there would be no jobs and you'd be poor. Trust us bro."

                  At least a third of this country falls for this over and over and over.

                  I have another theory.

                  What if it's not important and it's just some wealthy people settling scores that have nothing to do with us?

                  guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                  guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                  guillotine_jones@beige.party
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @futurebird
                  Won't you think of the Trump family finances, myrmepropagandist?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                    @Tamtam

                    For years I thought that was the driving idea behind many US military actions. If not oil then some other form of economic profiteering.

                    I have come to *reject* this. The notion it is "if not moral at least it is profitable" gives them too much credit.

                    War profiteering is a fleeting, inefficient way to build wealth. Objectively? They destroy wealth.

                    They don't care about having "more" but rather "more than the other guy"

                    tamtam@mastodon.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tamtam@mastodon.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tamtam@mastodon.de
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @futurebird ohh you are absolutely right in that it does not make sense and the destruction is far greater that the profit. But the profit is theirs. The destruction is everybody elses. But still, you are absolutely right. There is no sense to it. Capitalism, oligarchy, feudalism, patriarchy... it is madness. It is a disease. What sense did it make to send a ship over the Atlantic under conditions that made 90 % percent of its human cargo die a painful death? No sense. Not to a normal person. Even if you accept the buying and selling of human beings it doesn't make any sense.What sense does the destruction of the german economy make, the destruction of any new technology like solar, batteries, e. mobility? It keeps the profits of the shareholders of powerful established cartels flowing for a little longer. And after that? What sense does the destruction of knowledge, the destruction of universities and independent thinking make? If we don't have democracy, we have kings. And they get madder and madder by the minute as the boundaries disappear. There is nothing new to see here. If you have ever seen a mad drunk violent narcissistic husband beat his wife and children to a pulp, you know everything there is to know about this. Look for sense elsewhere. This is madness. We agree on that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • laukidh@infosec.exchangeL laukidh@infosec.exchange

                      @futurebird @Tamtam also, we recognized our dependence on foreign oil and have become a net exporter.

                      We don’t need anyone else’s oil. A couple seized tankers doesn’t come close to what we’ve spent on this.

                      tamtam@mastodon.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tamtam@mastodon.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tamtam@mastodon.de
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @Laukidh @futurebird the " we" beign the US I suppose? But what about Venezuela and the Venezuelan crude and gulf coast refineries that were supposed to have been built exclusively for it?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups