yahoo news | The boys’ club: How Epstein’s influence shaped the exclusion of women in STEMThe 2018 planning emails for an elite scientific retreat in Connecticut reveal how Jeffrey Epstein used his money and connections to shape a “boys’ club” that systematically excluded women. When New York literary agent John Brockman suggested adding two women to the guest list, Epstein replied, “The women are all weak, and a distraction,” and later wrote that there were “no really smart women – none.” The exchange, released by the Justice Department, shows Epstein’s deep entanglement with top researchers despite his 2008 conviction, and how his influence helped fund male‑dominated labs, book deals, and Silicon‑Valley networks while keeping women out of the same circles.The emails also contain a string of overtly misogynistic remarks from respected scientists. AI theorist Roger Schank dismissed women’s focus on appearance, Epstein echoed the sentiment, and former Harvard president Larry Summers joked that “half the IQ in the world was possessed by women.” Women scientists such as Nicole Baran, Lauren Aulet, and Alison Twelvetrees describe how these attitudes translate into concrete barriers: invisible networks, fewer invitations to conferences, reduced access to recommendation letters, and a tenure system that favors men who are already well‑connected. The dehumanizing language—referring to a promising undergraduate as a “very good‑looking blonde,” or implying a mentoring relationship was a pretext for sexual advance—underscores how sexism is woven into the professional fabric of elite academia.The revelations demonstrate that explicit misogyny, not just “micro‑aggressions,” still drives the exclusion of women from high‑level STEM spaces. They also connect past patterns to present controversies, such as Elon Musk’s AI tool that generates sexualized images of women, highlighting a broader culture that tolerates or ignores gendered harm. As women in science reflect on the impact of these attitudes, they question whether their ideas will ever be taken seriously and grapple with the difficulty of separating valuable research from the tainted behavior of its creators. The story forces the scientific community to confront a deeply corrupted system that, through funding, networking, and entrenched bias, continues to marginalize women.Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/boys-rsquo-club-epstein-rsquo-183025494.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall#jeffreyepstein #johnbrockman
