@phnt@fluffytail.orgIn the before times (5+ years ago), very few cared who was joining the network. (Notice the "network", this place isn't Mastodon and never was.) When someone joined, it was seen as a good thing no matter who that was, because it made the network larger, the decentralization was spreading. But in the last 5 years, the goals seemingly shifted. Suddenly more people on here turned to a bad thing, a decentralized network meant to allow anyone to have a voice turned into a fractured space of gatekept echo-chambers with very little bridges between them. Some might say, that is the result of not gatekeeping the today's gatekeepers, but I don't really care and still mostly have the old mindset in my mind. It is more of a reflection on how humanity changed.I've been using "the network" since the days of USENET, 1990 onward, and I can attest that, at least in my experience, none of this rings true even a little.Even so, the discourse I'm responding to is about Mastodon, not about some nebulous or idealized "network". Goalpost shifting is not constructive.Nobody has "power" hereOf course we do. I have the power to block whoever I want and whichever hashtags I want, for instance. I also have the power to restrict who registers an account on my fediverse instance. You are not permitted to join my instance, and in that sense I very much have power over you: I am able to restrict your liberty. You may not want an account and I don't blame you, but that doesn't change the equation.I said nothing about excluding people from the network. I literally said "excluding people and topics they don't wish to interact with". You seem to be arguing against something that wasn't said, which is not constructive.Oh, and if anyone cares, my little gatekept and bridgeless corner of the fediverse is quite lovely, thanks, and grand proclamations about fractured spaces or whatnot have no bearing whatsover on this simple reality.excluding anyone from this network is equivalent for both cases, marginalized groups and "AI people".These are obviously not equivalent in any sense that matters. You might as well include "people who love putting topsoil on their pizza" as a marginalized group because someone said "eww" once. Superficial associations like this sound disingenuous to my ears, and in any case are not constructive.And that it isn't healthy.Why would excluding "AI people" in particular be unhealthy? What exactly are the ill effects?