Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What could possibly go wrong?

What could possibly go wrong?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
politicsbanking
16 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

    What could possibly go wrong?

    The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

    Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

    Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

    #politics #banking
    h/t FT

    etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    etchedpixels@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @ChrisMayLA6 And the SEC is trying to remove quarterly reporting requirements to hide the current mess too.

    Given car loan delinquency is already over 6% I don't imagine it'll look pretty when the US private credit mess explodes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
      R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
      R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

      What could possibly go wrong?

      The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

      Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

      Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

      #politics #banking
      h/t FT

      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @ChrisMayLA6

      Oh, how can that be? The current set of stories about private equity and private banking restricting the amount people can withdraw plus what we can know about their leveraging investor money with commercial bank loans suggest they might be a wee bit over leveraged.

      A long time ago was easy money for private equity and so on it isn’t anymore

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

        What could possibly go wrong?

        The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

        Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

        Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

        #politics #banking
        h/t FT

        labspokane@mas.toL This user is from outside of this forum
        labspokane@mas.toL This user is from outside of this forum
        labspokane@mas.to
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @ChrisMayLA6 Nobody went to jail then. Nobody is going to jail now. And the usual suspects will make out like bandits. So, what was the problem, again?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gemlog@tilde.zoneG gemlog@tilde.zone

          @ChrisMayLA6 It's not only those kinds of things.
          Reducing or removing environmental protections are a Big Other.
          The USA is going backwards in time and in short order.
          https://morethanjustparks.substack.com/p/blm-announces-plan-to-fell-oregons
          And on mercury, CO2, lead... USians are right screwed.
          And lots of other things. The misinformation on vaccinations will kill and maim many USians in the coming years. Health and safety, medical coverage, unions, food stamps - nearly any advance in USian society since WWII is being rolled back - especially 80% taxes on the filthy rich to near zero, while increasing the tax burden on the poor to pay for the USA's military-based economy.
          I'm much closer to it than you are, and I'm watching an implosion into autocracy I think.

          chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
          chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
          chrismayla6@zirk.us
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @gemlog

          Yes, even from this distance it looks like that...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

            What could possibly go wrong?

            The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

            Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

            Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

            #politics #banking
            h/t FT

            leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
            leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
            leeloo@c.im
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @ChrisMayLA6
            Oh, they've learned their lesson.

            Crashing the economy to make money worth less causes stock prices to go UP.

            Legal restrictions on those people don't exist because they don't know what they are doing. They exist because they know exactly what they are doing.

            chrismayla6@zirk.usC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • leeloo@c.imL leeloo@c.im

              @ChrisMayLA6
              Oh, they've learned their lesson.

              Crashing the economy to make money worth less causes stock prices to go UP.

              Legal restrictions on those people don't exist because they don't know what they are doing. They exist because they know exactly what they are doing.

              chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
              chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
              chrismayla6@zirk.us
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @leeloo

              Ha ha, yes fair enough - that lesson certainly has been learnt (but they may known that before 2008)

              leeloo@c.imL 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                What could possibly go wrong?

                The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

                Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

                Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

                #politics #banking
                h/t FT

                welkin7@mstdn.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                welkin7@mstdn.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                welkin7@mstdn.party
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @ChrisMayLA6
                Name one #bankster who went to jail after 2008.
                Name one #bankster CEO who lost his job without a golden parachute.

                #Democrats protected them. So did #Republicans.

                And now seeds are being sown to do a repeat of #1987 and of #2008

                H 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                  @leeloo

                  Ha ha, yes fair enough - that lesson certainly has been learnt (but they may known that before 2008)

                  leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                  leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                  leeloo@c.im
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @ChrisMayLA6
                  Maybe. It seems to me that before, the goal was to make the stock prices go up, and crashing the economy was just a side effect. But after 2008, the goal has been to intentionally crash the economy to make stock prices go up.

                  But maybe that's just me.

                  chrismayla6@zirk.usC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                    What could possibly go wrong?

                    The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

                    Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

                    Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

                    #politics #banking
                    h/t FT

                    sector9@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sector9@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sector9@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @ChrisMayLA6

                    The Great Depression was a severe global economic downturn from 1929 to 1939.
                    It looks like some people are trying to do a reboot to 2029-2039.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • leeloo@c.imL leeloo@c.im

                      @ChrisMayLA6
                      Maybe. It seems to me that before, the goal was to make the stock prices go up, and crashing the economy was just a side effect. But after 2008, the goal has been to intentionally crash the economy to make stock prices go up.

                      But maybe that's just me.

                      chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                      chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                      chrismayla6@zirk.us
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @leeloo

                      Well, there's a analytical approach that would label such practice(s) observed the latter: 'disaster capitalism' so quite possibly the case

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • welkin7@mstdn.partyW welkin7@mstdn.party

                        @ChrisMayLA6
                        Name one #bankster who went to jail after 2008.
                        Name one #bankster CEO who lost his job without a golden parachute.

                        #Democrats protected them. So did #Republicans.

                        And now seeds are being sown to do a repeat of #1987 and of #2008

                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        hakeemg@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @welkin7 @ChrisMayLA6

                        Actually they didn't protect them.

                        https://www.npr.org/2013/07/26/205866019/few-on-wall-street-have-been-prosecuted-for-financial-crisis

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                          What could possibly go wrong?

                          The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

                          Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

                          Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

                          #politics #banking
                          h/t FT

                          capnthommo@c.imC This user is from outside of this forum
                          capnthommo@c.imC This user is from outside of this forum
                          capnthommo@c.im
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @ChrisMayLA6 a lot of profit to be made in a crisis. So said rees mogg, or his father. That's their objective. Rinse and repeat

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                            What could possibly go wrong?

                            The US Federal Reserve (that regulates US banks) is about to reduce the capital adequacy requirement for banks (raised in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis).

                            Of course, nearly 20 years after the global financial crisis, regulators & bankers may say they've learned the lessons of 2008, but what they really mean is they've (wilfully) forgotten them.

                            Just one more act bringing a crisis nearer (as if attacking Iran wasn't;t enough)!

                            #politics #banking
                            h/t FT

                            robparsons@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            robparsons@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            robparsons@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            @ChrisMayLA6 Ohhhhhhh, shit.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups