Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
gascdnpoli
34 Posts 21 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alessandro@cosocial.caA alessandro@cosocial.ca

    @Karnbot13

    Oh there's no doubt they funded lobbying! But that isn't just a big oil problem - everybody does it. We need to drop the hammer on all of them, but it's a separate issue.

    @dacmot @avilewis

    karnbot13@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    karnbot13@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    karnbot13@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    @alessandro @dacmot @avilewis We can drop the hammer on all of them eventually. I suggest we deal with the climate problems caused by their products. Using the government to tax them out of existing at the level they're at, would be a good start. Might even come up with some less violent solutions for dealing with billionaires too

    dacmot@sunny.gardenD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • avilewis@mstdn.caA avilewis@mstdn.ca

      Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

      Oil companies are on track to make tens of billions in windfall profits from Trump’s illegal war in Iran.

      It’s their profiteering that’s driving up prices. It’s them who should pay.

      It’s time for price caps on gas to stop oil companies from price-gouging Canadians — and a windfall profits tax on war-time oil revenues, so the government can invest that money in the public interest.

      Link Preview Image
      Carney temporarily suspending federal fuel excise tax on gas, diesel and aviation fuel | CBC News

      A day after sweeping three byelections in Ontario and Quebec that gave him a majority in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is temporarily removing the federal excise tax on gas and diesel.

      favicon

      CBC (www.cbc.ca)

      #cdnpoli #gas

      bazcook@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
      bazcook@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
      bazcook@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      @avilewis - Carney taking the Liberal Party to Tory Lite aside, Its the profiteering by the companies, countries and stock market that is responsible for the hike in prices - especially in North America, where we natively have the product and the ability to refine it for our purposes.
      But mention that is some quarters (like Alberta) and you'll be seen as a direct challenge to them.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • karnbot13@mastodon.socialK karnbot13@mastodon.social

        @alessandro @dacmot @avilewis We can drop the hammer on all of them eventually. I suggest we deal with the climate problems caused by their products. Using the government to tax them out of existing at the level they're at, would be a good start. Might even come up with some less violent solutions for dealing with billionaires too

        dacmot@sunny.gardenD This user is from outside of this forum
        dacmot@sunny.gardenD This user is from outside of this forum
        dacmot@sunny.garden
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        @Karnbot13 I agree with you in principle: we need to get rid of fossil fuels, and the sooner the better.

        Unfortunately, such a draconian method could cause further gas price hikes and be very unpopular. Any government implementing this would need to lie by omission to be elected, if they are elected at all, and would almost certainly be ousted at the next elections.

        Would it be worth it? Maybe. It could give the jolt we collectively need to change our destructive way of life. I have a feeling however it would be short lived.

        @alessandro @avilewis

        karnbot13@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • avilewis@mstdn.caA avilewis@mstdn.ca

          Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

          Oil companies are on track to make tens of billions in windfall profits from Trump’s illegal war in Iran.

          It’s their profiteering that’s driving up prices. It’s them who should pay.

          It’s time for price caps on gas to stop oil companies from price-gouging Canadians — and a windfall profits tax on war-time oil revenues, so the government can invest that money in the public interest.

          Link Preview Image
          Carney temporarily suspending federal fuel excise tax on gas, diesel and aviation fuel | CBC News

          A day after sweeping three byelections in Ontario and Quebec that gave him a majority in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is temporarily removing the federal excise tax on gas and diesel.

          favicon

          CBC (www.cbc.ca)

          #cdnpoli #gas

          sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
          sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
          sleepy62@social.vivaldi.net
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          @avilewis

          I really wish he would have announced a 2.5B$ investment in #renewables and #EV charging, instead of yet another #fossilFuels subsidy.

          rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dacmot@sunny.gardenD dacmot@sunny.garden

            @Karnbot13 I agree with you in principle: we need to get rid of fossil fuels, and the sooner the better.

            Unfortunately, such a draconian method could cause further gas price hikes and be very unpopular. Any government implementing this would need to lie by omission to be elected, if they are elected at all, and would almost certainly be ousted at the next elections.

            Would it be worth it? Maybe. It could give the jolt we collectively need to change our destructive way of life. I have a feeling however it would be short lived.

            @alessandro @avilewis

            karnbot13@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            karnbot13@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            karnbot13@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            @dacmot @alessandro @avilewis I am not a doomer, I believe we will make the right decisions, if we have good information. We know what the problem is and our conservative\neoliberal governments refuse to do much for anyone other than the obscenely rich, who just happen to own most of the sources of the information. It's funny that it always has to be cuts to the public services and never return to the post WW II tax rates of the 50s. We can't wait too much longer to deal with this though

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.org

              @icanbob @avilewis
              If you think MMT means "taxes are unnecessary now" you have probably misunderstood MMT.

              Governments spend money into circulation, and tax it out of circulation. If they only spend it and never tax it, then the circulating pool of money grows too quickly: hyperinflation. Trust me that you don't want that.

              janef0421@mastodon.nzJ This user is from outside of this forum
              janef0421@mastodon.nzJ This user is from outside of this forum
              janef0421@mastodon.nz
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              @dragonfrog @icanbob @avilewis That’s an incomplete analysis. The value of money is determined by the supply of money relative to the amount of value available to be purchased in the economy. As a result, printing money for public investment does not cause hyperinflation, because the additional value created by investment at least partially offsets the increased money supply.

              dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD I 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • avilewis@mstdn.caA avilewis@mstdn.ca

                Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

                Oil companies are on track to make tens of billions in windfall profits from Trump’s illegal war in Iran.

                It’s their profiteering that’s driving up prices. It’s them who should pay.

                It’s time for price caps on gas to stop oil companies from price-gouging Canadians — and a windfall profits tax on war-time oil revenues, so the government can invest that money in the public interest.

                Link Preview Image
                Carney temporarily suspending federal fuel excise tax on gas, diesel and aviation fuel | CBC News

                A day after sweeping three byelections in Ontario and Quebec that gave him a majority in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is temporarily removing the federal excise tax on gas and diesel.

                favicon

                CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                #cdnpoli #gas

                misterstormwing@jorts.horseM This user is from outside of this forum
                misterstormwing@jorts.horseM This user is from outside of this forum
                misterstormwing@jorts.horse
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                @avilewis more like war-crime oil revenues.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • janef0421@mastodon.nzJ janef0421@mastodon.nz

                  @dragonfrog @icanbob @avilewis That’s an incomplete analysis. The value of money is determined by the supply of money relative to the amount of value available to be purchased in the economy. As a result, printing money for public investment does not cause hyperinflation, because the additional value created by investment at least partially offsets the increased money supply.

                  dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  @janef0421 @icanbob @avilewis assuming there's no competition in the economy for the inputs into the project, sure. But there is, in fact, competition for construction labour and materials.

                  janef0421@mastodon.nzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • janef0421@mastodon.nzJ janef0421@mastodon.nz

                    @dragonfrog @icanbob @avilewis That’s an incomplete analysis. The value of money is determined by the supply of money relative to the amount of value available to be purchased in the economy. As a result, printing money for public investment does not cause hyperinflation, because the additional value created by investment at least partially offsets the increased money supply.

                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    icanbob@techhub.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    @avilewis @janef0421 @dragonfrog Here is my take on MMT.

                    Link Preview Image

                    favicon

                    (energyasicit.ca)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.org

                      @icanbob @avilewis
                      If you think MMT means "taxes are unnecessary now" you have probably misunderstood MMT.

                      Governments spend money into circulation, and tax it out of circulation. If they only spend it and never tax it, then the circulating pool of money grows too quickly: hyperinflation. Trust me that you don't want that.

                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                      icanbob@techhub.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      @dragonfrog @avilewis I really love Warren Mosler’s business card analogy which shows that taxes are what gives fiat money it’s value.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.org

                        @janef0421 @icanbob @avilewis assuming there's no competition in the economy for the inputs into the project, sure. But there is, in fact, competition for construction labour and materials.

                        janef0421@mastodon.nzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        janef0421@mastodon.nzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        janef0421@mastodon.nz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        @dragonfrog @icanbob @avilewis Unless there’s a supply persistent supply shortage, that isn’t going to offset the increase in produced value. It might impact prices of those particular goods, but that isn’t inflationary by definition.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS sleepy62@social.vivaldi.net

                          @avilewis

                          I really wish he would have announced a 2.5B$ investment in #renewables and #EV charging, instead of yet another #fossilFuels subsidy.

                          rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          @sleepy62 @avilewis

                          Predominantly foreign owned O&G companies in Canada are going to make an extra $6B+ from 47's war on Iran... Instead of spending $2.4B of public money on a gas tax cut, Carney could have enacted a 75% excess profit tax (bringing in $4.5B+) and split the revenue 50/50 between renewable infrastructure and a affordability rebate to the 80% of Canadians with the lowest household incomes.

                          It would have helped more, would have resulted in actual generational infrastructure (which he like to talk about), and wouldn't require cuts to other programs to pay for.

                          sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca

                            @sleepy62 @avilewis

                            Predominantly foreign owned O&G companies in Canada are going to make an extra $6B+ from 47's war on Iran... Instead of spending $2.4B of public money on a gas tax cut, Carney could have enacted a 75% excess profit tax (bringing in $4.5B+) and split the revenue 50/50 between renewable infrastructure and a affordability rebate to the 80% of Canadians with the lowest household incomes.

                            It would have helped more, would have resulted in actual generational infrastructure (which he like to talk about), and wouldn't require cuts to other programs to pay for.

                            sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sleepy62@social.vivaldi.net
                            wrote last edited by
                            #29

                            @RantingCanuck @avilewis

                            And they can do that now cus majority... but then they seem to be shit scared of upsetting the fossil industry.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • avilewis@mstdn.caA avilewis@mstdn.ca

                              Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

                              Oil companies are on track to make tens of billions in windfall profits from Trump’s illegal war in Iran.

                              It’s their profiteering that’s driving up prices. It’s them who should pay.

                              It’s time for price caps on gas to stop oil companies from price-gouging Canadians — and a windfall profits tax on war-time oil revenues, so the government can invest that money in the public interest.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Carney temporarily suspending federal fuel excise tax on gas, diesel and aviation fuel | CBC News

                              A day after sweeping three byelections in Ontario and Quebec that gave him a majority in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is temporarily removing the federal excise tax on gas and diesel.

                              favicon

                              CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                              #cdnpoli #gas

                              mikebabcock@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mikebabcock@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mikebabcock@floss.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #30

                              @avilewis strong disagree. Its time for gas to cost twice as much and for people to realize they need to stop buying cars that use it. Purchasing gas is the problem, not the price of it. Average Canadian drives 15,200km/yr = ~1300L of gas at average 8.5L/100km. Saving $0.10/L is not exciting. Saving the whole $1.75/L is. Stop driving gas-only cars.
                              #EV #PHEV #vehicles #cars #driving #electrify

                              503bartley@pdx.social5 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mikebabcock@floss.socialM mikebabcock@floss.social

                                @avilewis strong disagree. Its time for gas to cost twice as much and for people to realize they need to stop buying cars that use it. Purchasing gas is the problem, not the price of it. Average Canadian drives 15,200km/yr = ~1300L of gas at average 8.5L/100km. Saving $0.10/L is not exciting. Saving the whole $1.75/L is. Stop driving gas-only cars.
                                #EV #PHEV #vehicles #cars #driving #electrify

                                503bartley@pdx.social5 This user is from outside of this forum
                                503bartley@pdx.social5 This user is from outside of this forum
                                503bartley@pdx.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                @mikebabcock @avilewis And mandate apartment dwellers have chargers.

                                mikebabcock@floss.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 503bartley@pdx.social5 503bartley@pdx.social

                                  @mikebabcock @avilewis And mandate apartment dwellers have chargers.

                                  mikebabcock@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mikebabcock@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mikebabcock@floss.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #32

                                  @503bartley @avilewis a number of places in Canada require EVSEs to be installed in all new builds. Putting them in older builds is harder. Requiring them in parking lots like handicap parking would be lovely though.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • avilewis@mstdn.caA avilewis@mstdn.ca

                                    Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

                                    Oil companies are on track to make tens of billions in windfall profits from Trump’s illegal war in Iran.

                                    It’s their profiteering that’s driving up prices. It’s them who should pay.

                                    It’s time for price caps on gas to stop oil companies from price-gouging Canadians — and a windfall profits tax on war-time oil revenues, so the government can invest that money in the public interest.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Carney temporarily suspending federal fuel excise tax on gas, diesel and aviation fuel | CBC News

                                    A day after sweeping three byelections in Ontario and Quebec that gave him a majority in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is temporarily removing the federal excise tax on gas and diesel.

                                    favicon

                                    CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                                    #cdnpoli #gas

                                    fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fgbjr@indieweb.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #33

                                    @avilewis That's what seems to be happening here in Japan. The end result of sudden-onset rationing will be interesting to observe (as a cyclist).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • avilewis@mstdn.caA avilewis@mstdn.ca

                                      Striking that the Liberals and Conservatives offer the same response to pain at the pump: siphon money out of the public purse instead of Big Oil’s profits.

                                      Oil companies are on track to make tens of billions in windfall profits from Trump’s illegal war in Iran.

                                      It’s their profiteering that’s driving up prices. It’s them who should pay.

                                      It’s time for price caps on gas to stop oil companies from price-gouging Canadians — and a windfall profits tax on war-time oil revenues, so the government can invest that money in the public interest.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Carney temporarily suspending federal fuel excise tax on gas, diesel and aviation fuel | CBC News

                                      A day after sweeping three byelections in Ontario and Quebec that gave him a majority in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is temporarily removing the federal excise tax on gas and diesel.

                                      favicon

                                      CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                                      #cdnpoli #gas

                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rickd6@mstdn.ca
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #34

                                      @avilewis a very interesting discussion here, thank you. Perhaps we need to plan a future that we want to see and detail it out, including the small steps required. Get public support for that (allowing for modifications along the way) and thus reduce the mismatch of what is, what’s needed and where the investments/money will be made in the future. Provided of course we don’t allow too much money going to any one company or individual.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups