Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It seems like the Debian Edu mailing list is talking about Linux becoming age-verification API module compliant: https://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2026/03/msg00005.html

It seems like the Debian Edu mailing list is talking about Linux becoming age-verification API module compliant: https://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2026/03/msg00005.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
linuxdebianageverification
5 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gopherpete@techhub.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gopherpete@techhub.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gopherpete@techhub.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    It seems like the Debian Edu mailing list is talking about Linux becoming age-verification API module compliant: https://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2026/03/msg00005.html

    Not what I wanted to read at 5am...

    #linux #debian #ageverification

    drajt@fosstodon.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gopherpete@techhub.socialG gopherpete@techhub.social

      It seems like the Debian Edu mailing list is talking about Linux becoming age-verification API module compliant: https://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2026/03/msg00005.html

      Not what I wanted to read at 5am...

      #linux #debian #ageverification

      drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      drajt@fosstodon.org
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @GopherPete to be fair to the concept, as annoying as it is, it's better to have something in the OS that we have control of, rather than outsourcing it all to some dodgy third party.

      Age verification is a problem, but I'd rather have control of it instead of someone else.

      gopherpete@techhub.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org

        @GopherPete to be fair to the concept, as annoying as it is, it's better to have something in the OS that we have control of, rather than outsourcing it all to some dodgy third party.

        Age verification is a problem, but I'd rather have control of it instead of someone else.

        gopherpete@techhub.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gopherpete@techhub.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gopherpete@techhub.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @drajt I'm concerned about feature creep among other things: if they're getting an age-range off the user, I'm sure that'll be tied in with other information that'll help to keep us "safe". Also, a lot of my usage is offline: I'll be interested to see if apps stop working for that reason.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org

          @GopherPete to be fair to the concept, as annoying as it is, it's better to have something in the OS that we have control of, rather than outsourcing it all to some dodgy third party.

          Age verification is a problem, but I'd rather have control of it instead of someone else.

          gopherpete@techhub.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gopherpete@techhub.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gopherpete@techhub.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @drajt Actually, do you remember the Clipper Chip? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

          That was put in place quickly and proved very unpopular (with users) - hopefully "they" won't think of a similar option which could be included in devices without us even knowing.

          drajt@fosstodon.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gopherpete@techhub.socialG gopherpete@techhub.social

            @drajt Actually, do you remember the Clipper Chip? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

            That was put in place quickly and proved very unpopular (with users) - hopefully "they" won't think of a similar option which could be included in devices without us even knowing.

            drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            drajt@fosstodon.org
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @GopherPete I agree that it's the thin edge of the wedge and not ideal, but the actions of some European countries such as the UK are worse.

            Many commercial social media sites are riddled with toxic content, but I think that just blocking children from them doesn't address the problem at the root, which is toxic content that makes some people a lot of money.

            I agree that governments' approaches are mostly bad and wrong.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups