Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. That Microsoft has restored WireGuard's ability to release updates is good, sure.

That Microsoft has restored WireGuard's ability to release updates is good, sure.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
18 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rhube@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
    rhube@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
    rhube@wandering.shop
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @neil I am not in favour of it, but I don't know how we can stop it, what with our government deeply in bed with Microsoft and betting the economy on appeasing American tech giants.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • slash909uk@mastodon.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
      slash909uk@mastodon.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
      slash909uk@mastodon.me.uk
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @neil @Rhube the French seem to be successfully dismantling the grip of M$ these days.. I hope the UK gov. is paying attention..

      rhube@wandering.shopR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • slash909uk@mastodon.me.ukS slash909uk@mastodon.me.uk

        @neil @Rhube the French seem to be successfully dismantling the grip of M$ these days.. I hope the UK gov. is paying attention..

        rhube@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
        rhube@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
        rhube@wandering.shop
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @Slash909uk @neil Alas, they don't want to. For some reason they think Big Tech will save them.

        _xcm@mastodon.social_ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
          mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
          mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @neil

          "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain"

          Something a lot of companies would do well to remember.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            houba@spore.social
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @neil

            What about the wrapping paper of "justice"? As a lawyer.

            I agree with your points, the question doesn't need to be taken solemnly.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • foxbasealpha@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
              foxbasealpha@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
              foxbasealpha@tech.lgbt
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @neil I suspect that the majority of folk want their things to ‘just work’. It used to be if you bought software it would have undergone decent QA testing, be designed by people that understood good UI design and on the rare occasion you’d need support it would be there. I’m not sure that’s the case any more…. Is open source the answer? In some cases yes (e.g. Open Office), in others (I’d argue a lot of Linux desktops) notsomuch. Ultimately, does it pass the grandmother test - could you install something and your grandmother could use it without needing continuous handholding - if it doesn’t then it will never be widely adopted…

              mudlark@bark.lgbtM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lumi@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
                lumi@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
                lumi@snug.moe
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @lispi314 @neil no one should have power over my own devices except myself. full power, without exception

                it's my machine, no one else gets to say what i do or don't do with it

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                  That Microsoft has restored WireGuard's ability to release updates is good, sure.

                  But should we really accept a situation in which Microsoft was able to take it away in the first place?

                  Different people will have different takes, I appreciate, but so much power concentrated in the hands of one private commercial organisation seems... unwise.

                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @neil

                  What about VeraCrypt? 🥺

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • foxbasealpha@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                    foxbasealpha@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                    foxbasealpha@tech.lgbt
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @neil Well, you’ll only get updates of open source software as long as their are people willing to maintain it. That’s a timebomb waiting to go off and will cause problems for commercial software too…
                    (Point taken - will think on how to rephrase in a neutral way)…

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • foxbasealpha@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                      foxbasealpha@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                      foxbasealpha@tech.lgbt
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @neil Microsoft and Apple’s gatekeeping hasn’t been that effective in keeping malicious actors away either - there’s been at least one case of compromised signing certificates introducing malicious code. I’m not convinced that it is done out of malice or even corporate interest, I think it’s done from a place of trying to keep the integrity of software. Supply chain compromises are real and increasingly common, but I suspect a lot of the reviews of third party developers have been automated and that’s where the intransigency kicks in…

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @neil

                        If you check, unsigned code will give you a warning, but you can install it.

                        As compared to all the npm crap that installs without warning off github.

                        Trying to download an update to LittleNavMap usually triggers a warning, but I trust the author far more than most random stuff on github that's signed.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                          That Microsoft has restored WireGuard's ability to release updates is good, sure.

                          But should we really accept a situation in which Microsoft was able to take it away in the first place?

                          Different people will have different takes, I appreciate, but so much power concentrated in the hands of one private commercial organisation seems... unwise.

                          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          npars01@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @neil

                          Considering the amount of investment that American tech companies are getting from anti-democracy outfits like Koch Network and from oppressive petrostate despots, it's prudent to move away from these platforms quickly.

                          https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/feb/18/international-criminal-court-icc-judges-trump-sanctions

                          They're private companies. There's no such thing as civil rights or fair treatment when located in a despotic regime like Trump's.

                          Or #PrinceBonesaw 's regime.

                          https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/156691-how-sanctions-can-weaponize-us-tech-against-the-icc.html

                          https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-google-hand-dissident-data-to-saudi-arabia-activists-say-2023-7

                          Link Preview Image
                          Microsoft may be forced to share user data with Saudi Arabia after investing $2B in cloud storage facility

                          Saudi officials announced that Microsoft has invested $2 billion in building a cloud storage facility in the kingdom. Privacy pundits are warning against what the move means for data security.

                          favicon

                          New York Post (nypost.com)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                            That Microsoft has restored WireGuard's ability to release updates is good, sure.

                            But should we really accept a situation in which Microsoft was able to take it away in the first place?

                            Different people will have different takes, I appreciate, but so much power concentrated in the hands of one private commercial organisation seems... unwise.

                            geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geoffl@mastodon.me.uk
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @neil WireGuard should boycott Macroslop now.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.ukN neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

                              That Microsoft has restored WireGuard's ability to release updates is good, sure.

                              But should we really accept a situation in which Microsoft was able to take it away in the first place?

                              Different people will have different takes, I appreciate, but so much power concentrated in the hands of one private commercial organisation seems... unwise.

                              ghawkins@mastodon.garyhawkins.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                              ghawkins@mastodon.garyhawkins.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                              ghawkins@mastodon.garyhawkins.uk
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @neil Actually, here's another (related) question. In the case of an open code signing arrangement, where you are able to install your own code signing certificate authorities instead of only being able to trust the one(s) that the operating system vendor provides, how do you prevent malicious actors from installing code signing CAs that you didn't want installed, and therefore able to run untrusted (by you) code?

                              It strikes me that neither scheme is without its problems.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • foxbasealpha@tech.lgbtF foxbasealpha@tech.lgbt

                                @neil I suspect that the majority of folk want their things to ‘just work’. It used to be if you bought software it would have undergone decent QA testing, be designed by people that understood good UI design and on the rare occasion you’d need support it would be there. I’m not sure that’s the case any more…. Is open source the answer? In some cases yes (e.g. Open Office), in others (I’d argue a lot of Linux desktops) notsomuch. Ultimately, does it pass the grandmother test - could you install something and your grandmother could use it without needing continuous handholding - if it doesn’t then it will never be widely adopted…

                                mudlark@bark.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mudlark@bark.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mudlark@bark.lgbt
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @foxbasealpha @neil funny enough, I’ve been recommending Linux as a better alternative for grandmas for a couple of years now
                                It think it works best for people who are either really into it (Linux enthusiasts) and for people with no tech literacy at all. You can set grandma up with a web browser and email program on Linux and she’ll never need OS help again. No bitlocker errors, pdf reader pop up ads, full page windows upgrade prompts, no way to stuff it up.

                                I think where Linux can fall flat is everybody else. People who need to use specific stuff that’s not in a web browser (art, streaming have been issues for me with Linux) games outside of steam, or competitive pvp games, music production and so on.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • rhube@wandering.shopR rhube@wandering.shop

                                  @Slash909uk @neil Alas, they don't want to. For some reason they think Big Tech will save them.

                                  _xcm@mastodon.social_ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  _xcm@mastodon.social_ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  _xcm@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @Rhube @Slash909uk @neil

                                  It’s likely that the UK government publishes the required solution and its mandatory features. The supplier selects whichever compliant product fits within the allocated budget, provided it has a commercial support contract.

                                  rhube@wandering.shopR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • _xcm@mastodon.social_ _xcm@mastodon.social

                                    @Rhube @Slash909uk @neil

                                    It’s likely that the UK government publishes the required solution and its mandatory features. The supplier selects whichever compliant product fits within the allocated budget, provided it has a commercial support contract.

                                    rhube@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rhube@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rhube@wandering.shop
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @_XCM @Slash909uk @neil This doesn't seem relevant to the discussion at hand. I'm muting this conversation, now.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafeS stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe shared this topic
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups