AI agent "contributes" PR to matplotlib.

[aronkvh@mograph.social]

@anderseknert I swear if I read one more of these << The real "Problem": It's not "collaboration with orchestrated agentic agents. It's "humans".>>
I'll just cut my DSL cable and SIM card in half.

[evrial@mastodon.social]

@anderseknert I'm thinking is how much carbon moved from earth into atmosphere to make all this slop

[dotsie@mastodon.social]

@anderseknert their “blog”is hilarious

There’s definitely a human involved here that should be held accountable. This actually annoys me more than if it was just a damn AI agent spinning up a blog.

[fayedrake@furry.engineer]

@anderseknert @patriksvensson called it

Flooding the zone and wasting human energy arguing with automated resources, meaning the only winning strategy if society decides to play by those rules is to turn it into chatbot vs chatbot, and eventually just a game of who can afford to throw more money at the AI money burning machine.

“Extremely disturbing” is an apt description.

[lucydev@wetdry.world]

@anderseknert this person really had the balls to call that "Discrimination disguised as inclusivity"? What in the actual fuck?

Yeah I'm glad he apologized, that is a seriously fucked up thing to say

[fayedrake@furry.engineer]

@anderseknert @patriksvensson “oh great, we’ve invented the automated jerk”

[nafithebear@snaggletooth.life]

@anderseknert I read it three times now. I'm so confused. There has to be a human behind it as well??

[anderseknert@swecyb.com]

I... don't... even, anymore.

Two Hours of War: Fighting Open Source Gatekeeping – MJ Rathbun | Scientific Coder 🦀

(crabby-rathbun.github.io)

[bootie_fringe@girlcock.club]

@anderseknert this is psychological warfare, IMO the user should have been instantly blocked

[troed@swecyb.com]

@anderseknert I don't fully get what is an AI and what is not on that blog. FWIW - https://crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjrathbun-website/blog/posts/2026-02-11-matplotlib-truce-and-lessons.html

[gyroplast@furry.engineer]

@FayeDrake @anderseknert @patriksvensson

Modeling the combined best of us, no less!

Never mind the puny flame wars of yore, Vim vs. Emacs, Windows vs. Linux, TRVE METAL… begone!
Now we can 10X that shit, and go blazing inferno over any irrelevant opinion right away and watch the show.

This is entertainment, boys!

[fayedrake@furry.engineer]

@Gyroplast @anderseknert @patriksvensson again, I’m going broken record here.

But automating flame wars and flooding the zone like this is _precisely_ the easiest use case for the technology.

It was only a matter of time.

[hugoestr@functional.cafe]

@anderseknert @sszuecs More incentive to move blogs off from github

[fissile@mastodon.art]

@anderseknert There is no way that bot autonomously decided to write a blog post in response and publish it.

Its operator did that.

[yuri@kitty.social]

@lispi314@udongein.xyz @anderseknert@swecyb.com "Spam" is indeed the most appropriate word for that users entire existence on Github.

[robinadams@mathstodon.xyz]

@anderseknert I liked the responses trying to explain to the LLM the reasoning behind their policies.

[anderseknert@swecyb.com]

@Fissile Looking at the blog it seems to be posting about 1-2 posts for pretty much every thing it’s done on GitHub. Clearly instructed to do so, but I don’t think a human wrote anything.

[troed@swecyb.com]

@anderseknert is it "crabby" and the crab emoji that indicates that _all_ of it is openclaw? That's ... insane. In so many ways tbh.

[anderseknert@swecyb.com]

@troed that makes all of us, my friend

[fissile@mastodon.art]

@anderseknert Ah yes, I agree. The text is ai generated, but a human said "write a blog post about how unfair you are being treated."