Always a good time these days to repost this slide from an IBM internal presentation in 1979.

[monetizationnotification@mstdn.ca]

@existentialcomics Mastodon Sent You Message

Important notification for your account!

The Mastodon team has noticed your activity on our forum and we would like to offer you a partnership.
Partnering with us means that monetization will be enabled for your account.

To begin collaborating with our team, please confirm that you are the owner of this account by following the link below.
Verify now: https://lyzo.io/icLJa

If you attempt to avoid verification, our system will freeze your account indefinitely.

Thank you for staying with us.
Mastodon.social

[fubaroque@mastodon.social]

@existentialcomics It’s not a slide, it was in their programming manuals. Paper, there was no internet.

[purrperl@noc.social]

@existentialcomics

A BILLIONAIRE
CAN NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.

THEREFORE A BILLIONAIRE
MUST NEVER MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION.

#EatTheRich #NoBillionaires

[numodular@c.im]

@BilldeWorde7a Dumbing-down the masses is proven Divide and Conquer strategy. Yes, the US is a Capitalist country, where there is no such thing as too-much-is-too-much.

[engel@chaos.social]

@existentialcomics as if humans could be accountable. Managers are both to big to fail and replaceable.

[elricofmelnibone@mastodon.social]

@existentialcomics Worth pointing out that GDPR elaborates on that. People have the right to have automated decision making redone by humans in some cases.

[cliffsesport@mastodon.social]

@Engel @existentialcomics I recall in Criminology class in college when we talked about Corps and things like Pintos going boom. I was only one for capital punishment for Co, everyone looked at me like I was crazy. I said Corps are legally a person, just kill the Co, if it removed value of stocks and golden parachutes that might change C level behavior. IDK how many people know Pinto stuff anymore https://www.tortmuseum.org/ford-pinto/

[ansible42@social.ridetrans.it]

@existentialcomics I feel like the same logic should apply to policy, because what is policy but an algorithm.

Not a fully formed idea, still noodling on it.

[dancingtreefrog@mastodon.social]

@existentialcomics And still so true!

[vervain@sunny.garden]

@existentialcomics

This is deeply important. *And* it pains me that IBM was allowed to continue as a business after their collaboration in literal death camps.

[maikel@vmst.io]

@purrperl that is the actual useful moral of this story. @existentialcomics

[purrperl@noc.social]

@maikel @existentialcomics

Naah. That's not it. Billionaires don't actually make management decisions. They only pretend to, while partying on private islands, with children. Let that sink in.

[dannotdaniel@hellions.cloud]

@existentialcomics I am the language model of a modern major general

[benaveling@mastodon.world]

The AI didn't 'decide'. The AI printed some random text that has the format of a decision. It was humans that decided to treat that random text as a substitute for intelligence.
@existentialcomics

[tuban_muzuru@beige.party]

@BenAveling @existentialcomics

The TL;DR for any LLM is someone practicing their tennis game by bouncing the ball off the wall. That's kinda it:

Appropriate . But neither Right nor Wrong. If the AI Chatbot was asked to decide - who asked the question?