Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation.

Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
50 Posts 23 Posters 9 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    Services shouldn't ban people from using arbitrary hardware and operating systems in the first place. Google's security excuse is clearly bogus when they permit devices with no patches for 10 years but not a much more secure OS. It's for enforcing their monopolies via GMS licensing, that's all.

    hidikem@piaille.frH This user is from outside of this forum
    hidikem@piaille.frH This user is from outside of this forum
    hidikem@piaille.fr
    wrote last edited by
    #40

    @GrapheneOS i complained on many official service they ignore it, the ombudsman was called and they seem to ignore it too.

    they all aswer the bullshit that you are labelled insecure by official tool, because google tool automatically mark non licensed OS as insecure regardless of their actual security.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

      Services shouldn't ban people from using arbitrary hardware and operating systems in the first place. Google's security excuse is clearly bogus when they permit devices with no patches for 10 years but not a much more secure OS. It's for enforcing their monopolies via GMS licensing, that's all.

      papageier@digitalcourage.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      papageier@digitalcourage.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      papageier@digitalcourage.social
      wrote last edited by
      #41

      @GrapheneOS Google has the entirety of its commercial success thanks to the openness and interoperability of the #WWW. To try an captcha it to build a walled garden is, frankly speaking, an act of disrespect for @timbl and the entire web community.

      Microsoft has tried it. Apple has tried it as well. Both have finally had the insight that working with the community is much more rewarding and profitable than working against it.

      Let's work toward Google having that same revelation as well.

      (Sorry for the pun, couldn't resist)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

        Services shouldn't ban people from using arbitrary hardware and operating systems in the first place. Google's security excuse is clearly bogus when they permit devices with no patches for 10 years but not a much more secure OS. It's for enforcing their monopolies via GMS licensing, that's all.

        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grapheneos@grapheneos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #42

        Unified Attestation is another anti-competitive system being pushed by multiple European companies. It will similarly lock people out from using arbitrary hardware and software. That's not a solution and is far worse than Android's much more open hardware attestation API.

        https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116239523775374959

        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

          Governments are increasingly mandating using Apple's App Attest and Google's Play Integrity for not only their own services but also commercial services. The EU is leading the charge of making these requirements for digital payments, ID, age verification, etc. Many EU government apps require them.

          eskealler@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          eskealler@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          eskealler@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #43

          @GrapheneOS yes, it is hugely problematic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

            Unified Attestation is another anti-competitive system being pushed by multiple European companies. It will similarly lock people out from using arbitrary hardware and software. That's not a solution and is far worse than Android's much more open hardware attestation API.

            https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116239523775374959

            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grapheneos@grapheneos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #44

            Android's hardware attestation shouldn't be used to lock out users not using specific hardware or OSes. However, the fact that it permits arbitrary roots of trust and OSes at least allows services to permit more. Google could use it to permit GrapheneOS for Play Integrity if that was about security.

            hidikem@piaille.frH 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

              Instead of governments stopping Apple and Google from engaging in egregiously anti-competitive behavior, they're directly participating in locking out competition via their own services. Requiring people to have an Apple device or Google-certified Android device is anti-competition, not security.

              lunareclipse@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
              lunareclipse@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
              lunareclipse@snug.moe
              wrote last edited by
              #45

              @GrapheneOS the irony that it's fine to use a desktop for the same task as long as you use SMS 2FA is also scorching

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #46

                @7cd4a72311bad46117e0f692dddc5f31a543b47ff4265b028f8d820ac808ab3c @MAlBarram We have a partnership with Motorola Mobility (Lenovo) and are working with them towards their 2027 devices providing all of our requirements and providing official GrapheneOS support. We're actively working with them on getting the requirements implemented and GrapheneOS ported to their devices. It has nothing to do with the thread we posted though since it's not going to help with any of this.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                  reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification will currently work with sandboxed Google Play on GrapheneOS but it clearly exists to provide a way for them to start using hardware attestation on systems without it. People without an iOS or Android device will be locked out when this is required even without that.

                  notavi10@critter.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                  notavi10@critter.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                  notavi10@critter.cafe
                  wrote last edited by
                  #47

                  @GrapheneOS does this mean that we gonna have to install sandboxed google play

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                    Android's hardware attestation shouldn't be used to lock out users not using specific hardware or OSes. However, the fact that it permits arbitrary roots of trust and OSes at least allows services to permit more. Google could use it to permit GrapheneOS for Play Integrity if that was about security.

                    hidikem@piaille.frH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hidikem@piaille.frH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hidikem@piaille.fr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #48

                    @GrapheneOS if it was about security this system would be more close to Https certificate (not identique of course for obvious techical reason) than what google make now (with themselve as sole capable certificate controler).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                      reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification will currently work with sandboxed Google Play on GrapheneOS but it clearly exists to provide a way for them to start using hardware attestation on systems without it. People without an iOS or Android device will be locked out when this is required even without that.

                      vonkordke@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vonkordke@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vonkordke@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #49

                      @GrapheneOS they just want you to buy their devices. They want to make their smartfones mandatory.
                      Governments should take that apart immediately, but they are powerless cowards.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                        Governments are increasingly mandating using Apple's App Attest and Google's Play Integrity for not only their own services but also commercial services. The EU is leading the charge of making these requirements for digital payments, ID, age verification, etc. Many EU government apps require them.

                        steely_glint@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        steely_glint@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        steely_glint@chaos.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #50

                        @GrapheneOS I side loaded the EU's sample age verification app - which seems to work on my GrapheneOS phone. Is there a way to know if it is only working because I also have the PlayStore installed?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups