Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
googleflossandroidfdroidkeepandroidopen
37 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

    @wittyuniversity Nope, we will not be verified developers!

    wittyuniversity@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wittyuniversity@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wittyuniversity@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @fdroidorg time to turn off automatic updates then 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

      Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

      #FDroid did since September, and interacted with folks in the Fediverse, forum, email and in person

      They all voiced one opinion: "developer verification must be stopped"

      @marcprux has written an open letter, signed by likeminded organisations who want to #keepandroidopen

      Click: https://f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-developer-verification.html

      kobold@orthographieanarchist.deK This user is from outside of this forum
      kobold@orthographieanarchist.deK This user is from outside of this forum
      kobold@orthographieanarchist.de
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @fdroidorg FFS! Plan B is to take another look into @postmarketOS

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • idaho@mas.toI idaho@mas.to

        @fdroidorg @marcprux Didn't google announce that they'll still allow unsigned apps but you'd have to jump through some more hoops to do so?

        fdroidorg@floss.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        fdroidorg@floss.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        fdroidorg@floss.social
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @Idaho We talk about that in the post, right?

        idaho@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

          @adventure_tense Non-stock Android will continue to work just fine (well until Google locks-down AOSP), but suddenly 3.9 billion devices won't be able to install good apps.

          adventure_tense@mapstodon.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
          adventure_tense@mapstodon.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
          adventure_tense@mapstodon.space
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @fdroidorg Totally understand. I'm just expressing my frustration of Google. I'm on GrapheneOS, and I know Google will come after AOSP next.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

            Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

            #FDroid did since September, and interacted with folks in the Fediverse, forum, email and in person

            They all voiced one opinion: "developer verification must be stopped"

            @marcprux has written an open letter, signed by likeminded organisations who want to #keepandroidopen

            Click: https://f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-developer-verification.html

            txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            txtx@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @fdroidorg Would this new policy apply to F-Droid on /e/ OS and LineageOS? Both of those are 'de-googled' so I'm curious how far that goes.

            @marcprux

            fdroidorg@floss.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

              @fdroidorg China already has many stores. And all are subject to their regulation Google is now copying.

              Link Preview Image
              China is turning the screw on app distribution in the country

              China announces new regulations requiring all app providers to register business details

              favicon

              Android Police (www.androidpolice.com)

              guardianproject@social.librem.oneG This user is from outside of this forum
              guardianproject@social.librem.oneG This user is from outside of this forum
              guardianproject@social.librem.one
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              @ohir @fdroidorg It would be good to have more info about that. I don't know much about how things work in China, but isn't Free Software viewed as as good thing there?

              ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                @LeelaTorres @hongminhee I meant the blog post from @fdroidorg as well

                eighthave@social.librem.oneE This user is from outside of this forum
                eighthave@social.librem.oneE This user is from outside of this forum
                eighthave@social.librem.one
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                @liaizon @LeelaTorres @hongminhee @fdroidorg Translation for f-droid.org is easy, you can contribute to the Korean translation of the posts here:
                https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/f-droid/website-posts/ko/

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                  @fdroidorg Would this new policy apply to F-Droid on /e/ OS and LineageOS? Both of those are 'de-googled' so I'm curious how far that goes.

                  @marcprux

                  fdroidorg@floss.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fdroidorg@floss.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fdroidorg@floss.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @txtx Degoogled means freedom 😉

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

                    @Rick_d_card That option will not be available, do read our post and the two linked past posts.

                    rick_d_card@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rick_d_card@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rick_d_card@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    @fdroidorg Thank-you for your reply. I guess I was reading too fast and came to a wrong conclusion.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • guardianproject@social.librem.oneG guardianproject@social.librem.one

                      @ohir @fdroidorg It would be good to have more info about that. I don't know much about how things work in China, but isn't Free Software viewed as as good thing there?

                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      @guardianproject @fdroidorg There is plenty of Chinese proxy agencies publishing howtos (and of course advertising their paid support on this bumpy way). IDNK current tightened regulations well. Eight years ago you as an indie developer was expected to give a whole lotta of personal info, and some percentage of your app "core" source code. Then you had to have agreement with local app-shop sites, then some 11 iirc. From article quoted I see now they added the 49% share requirement.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

                        Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

                        #FDroid did since September, and interacted with folks in the Fediverse, forum, email and in person

                        They all voiced one opinion: "developer verification must be stopped"

                        @marcprux has written an open letter, signed by likeminded organisations who want to #keepandroidopen

                        Click: https://f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-developer-verification.html

                        keydelk@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                        keydelk@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                        keydelk@fosstodon.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @fdroidorg @marcprux - Also sign the petition at change.org. The more of us that speak out against it the better chance we have of getting Google to back down. https://c.org/kRnMMnS9LP

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

                          @Idaho We talk about that in the post, right?

                          idaho@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                          idaho@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                          idaho@mas.to
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @fdroidorg I read your toot but not the article 🙃 Didn't know Google still hasn't layed out that plan and intends to do it after they release Android 17...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

                            Post translated in #Romanian and #Chinese, more to come.

                            fdroidorg@floss.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fdroidorg@floss.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fdroidorg@floss.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #35

                            Now in #Czech and #Indonesian too.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

                              Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

                              #FDroid did since September, and interacted with folks in the Fediverse, forum, email and in person

                              They all voiced one opinion: "developer verification must be stopped"

                              @marcprux has written an open letter, signed by likeminded organisations who want to #keepandroidopen

                              Click: https://f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-developer-verification.html

                              mcepl@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mcepl@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mcepl@en.osm.town
                              wrote last edited by
                              #36

                              @fdroidorg @marcprux

                              I completely agree with everything written by F-Droid, and I have signed the petition, but still this is the reminder for all developers why should prefer the only truly free platform for development of applications, which is the Internet itself, and #Webapp s . Yes, it is not fit for every application, but everywhere else you are #Sharecropper on your master’s plantation.

                              Link Preview Image
                              The Web’s the Place

                              favicon

                              ongoing by Tim Bray (www.tbray.org)

                              Thank you, @timbray for reminding us!

                              #SPA #WebsThePlace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • fdroidorg@floss.socialF fdroidorg@floss.social

                                Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

                                #FDroid did since September, and interacted with folks in the Fediverse, forum, email and in person

                                They all voiced one opinion: "developer verification must be stopped"

                                @marcprux has written an open letter, signed by likeminded organisations who want to #keepandroidopen

                                Click: https://f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-developer-verification.html

                                yann_t@mastodon.designY This user is from outside of this forum
                                yann_t@mastodon.designY This user is from outside of this forum
                                yann_t@mastodon.design
                                wrote last edited by
                                #37

                                @eda @aurelien Surely it is of interest for you 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups