Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 21 Posters 68 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

    The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

    dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @infobeautiful This might explain why I'm reading about prices of PV electricity sold to the grid plummeting (as there is barely any storage capacity).

    ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • martin@libera.siteM martin@libera.site
      @Information Is Beautiful Power for several hours a day. In winter time even weeks without power, sometimes.
      tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tartley@fosstodon.org
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @martin ??? Solar plus wind plus batteries provide power for free, reducing need for fossil fuel dependence by 80% or 100% in some places, what's not to like?

      martin@libera.siteM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • aanee@mastodon.onlineA aanee@mastodon.online

        @infobeautiful A basic trend curve would have given a better prediction.

        tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tartley@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @aanee @infobeautiful while I'm 100% on board with you directionally, I suppose the counter argument would be that exponential growth has to tap out eventually, is just a question of when it turns into an S-curve.

        aanee@mastodon.onlineA klegdixal@social.vivaldi.netK whvholst@eupolicy.socialW bigheadmode@social.linux.pizzaB 4 Replies Last reply
        0
        • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

          @aanee @infobeautiful while I'm 100% on board with you directionally, I suppose the counter argument would be that exponential growth has to tap out eventually, is just a question of when it turns into an S-curve.

          aanee@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
          aanee@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
          aanee@mastodon.online
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @tartley @infobeautiful True enough, but I still think the expectations in the graph are extremely pessimistic.

          tartley@fosstodon.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

            @aanee @infobeautiful while I'm 100% on board with you directionally, I suppose the counter argument would be that exponential growth has to tap out eventually, is just a question of when it turns into an S-curve.

            klegdixal@social.vivaldi.netK This user is from outside of this forum
            klegdixal@social.vivaldi.netK This user is from outside of this forum
            klegdixal@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @tartley @aanee @infobeautiful that's what the predictions assumed. But nobody expected the Chinese inquisition.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • aanee@mastodon.onlineA aanee@mastodon.online

              @tartley @infobeautiful True enough, but I still think the expectations in the graph are extremely pessimistic.

              tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tartley@fosstodon.org
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @aanee @infobeautiful oh yes, you are absolutely right! Extremely well funded and insidious thumbs on the scales from the fossil fuel lobby.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                xs4me2@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @infobeautiful

                Soon this will need a log scale…

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

                  @aanee @infobeautiful while I'm 100% on board with you directionally, I suppose the counter argument would be that exponential growth has to tap out eventually, is just a question of when it turns into an S-curve.

                  whvholst@eupolicy.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  whvholst@eupolicy.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  whvholst@eupolicy.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @tartley @aanee @infobeautiful It will turn into an S-curve sometime after the full electrification of Africa, South and South-East Asia and Latin America.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

                    @martin ??? Solar plus wind plus batteries provide power for free, reducing need for fossil fuel dependence by 80% or 100% in some places, what's not to like?

                    martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martin@libera.site
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18
                    @Jonathan Hartley Nope. You need 100% backup(from about 50% of Ren share). Fossil backup.
                    That's why it's not cheap. and will not be. Never.

                    #^https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkelflaute
                    tartley@fosstodon.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

                      @infobeautiful This might explain why I'm reading about prices of PV electricity sold to the grid plummeting (as there is barely any storage capacity).

                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful storage capacity is artifically restrained. We have the tech to store electricity cheap and with a one-time low investment and minimal maintenance sosts, we have the millenia old tech to store heat, yet more and more legislatures are -lobbied- bribed to make cheap perpetual solutions illegal.

                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

                        @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful storage capacity is artifically restrained. We have the tech to store electricity cheap and with a one-time low investment and minimal maintenance sosts, we have the millenia old tech to store heat, yet more and more legislatures are -lobbied- bribed to make cheap perpetual solutions illegal.

                        dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @ohir
                        [citation needed]

                        @infobeautiful

                        ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

                          @ohir
                          [citation needed]

                          @infobeautiful

                          ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                          ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                          ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful are you asking about "lobbying" efforts (this would be R 2023/1542 and Digital Battery Passport kicking in next year). The whole regulations only skim non-patentable technologies, like lead-acid batteries. These can be operational for millenia, due to their simple chemistry. The only maintenance that must be done is on-site processing of sulfated battery plates. Something that once upon a time (1950-1990) was being done on the massive scale in Central/East Europe countries. Then lobbied country's legislative can bar mid-sized installations as unable to met the EU demands (tried recently in Poland afair).

                          dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                            The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                            jernej__s@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jernej__s@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jernej__s@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @infobeautiful The opposite of

                            Link Preview Image
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                              The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                              amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
                              amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
                              amici@fribygda.no
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @infobeautiful

                              war and conflict is unfortunately a likely major contributor to this, though I'm glad the shift is happening

                              just look at what happened to Cuba lately, without fuel the society goes to a standstill, they desperately need more green tech and everyone will know that unless they also make the shift, the unpredictability of fossil fuel politics may hit them hard at some point, adding to all the other existing arguments to shift

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

                                @aanee @infobeautiful while I'm 100% on board with you directionally, I suppose the counter argument would be that exponential growth has to tap out eventually, is just a question of when it turns into an S-curve.

                                bigheadmode@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bigheadmode@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bigheadmode@social.linux.pizza
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @tartley The Total Addressable Market of solar panels is anywhere that can have a reasonable ROI on a solar panel given local electricity demand. As panels get cheaper they become economical in cloudier places.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tartley@fosstodon.org
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @dryak @aanee @infobeautiful I totally agree. I suppose the black-pilled establishment energy industry might expect another limiting factor would be running out of loony environmentalists to sell them too, if they could only sway public opinion sufficiently. But I agree with you, they were holding back the tide.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • martin@libera.siteM martin@libera.site
                                    @Jonathan Hartley Nope. You need 100% backup(from about 50% of Ren share). Fossil backup.
                                    That's why it's not cheap. and will not be. Never.

                                    #^https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkelflaute
                                    tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tartley@fosstodon.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @martin you might need access to 100% backup while still being able to reduce your need for fossil generated energy by a majority amount - those aren't incompatible.

                                    martin@libera.siteM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

                                      @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful are you asking about "lobbying" efforts (this would be R 2023/1542 and Digital Battery Passport kicking in next year). The whole regulations only skim non-patentable technologies, like lead-acid batteries. These can be operational for millenia, due to their simple chemistry. The only maintenance that must be done is on-site processing of sulfated battery plates. Something that once upon a time (1950-1990) was being done on the massive scale in Central/East Europe countries. Then lobbied country's legislative can bar mid-sized installations as unable to met the EU demands (tried recently in Poland afair).

                                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @ohir
                                      So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

                                      Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

                                      @infobeautiful

                                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wonka@chaos.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @TechConnectify has a take on that: https://youtu.be/KtQ9nt2ZeGM

                                        @dryak @tartley @aanee @infobeautiful

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                                          The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                                          simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          simplicator@federate.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @infobeautiful More than enough to power a DeLorean back to the future 🙂

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups