Maybe its the cold medicine, but I dont understand the whole Pentagon Anthropic scuffle.
-
Maybe its the cold medicine, but I dont understand the whole Pentagon Anthropic scuffle.
Im not saying that killerbot AI is a good thing or something that we want.
But logically why cant the Pentagon take one of the existing open LLM models or combine multiple LLM models and create their own killerbot AI platform?
Why depend on third parties? Sure outsourcing is easy and what the Gov likes to do, but if its a barrier to outcomes, rather than publicly bully a company, why not insource the project.
There has to be more to the story. IMO
-
Maybe its the cold medicine, but I dont understand the whole Pentagon Anthropic scuffle.
Im not saying that killerbot AI is a good thing or something that we want.
But logically why cant the Pentagon take one of the existing open LLM models or combine multiple LLM models and create their own killerbot AI platform?
Why depend on third parties? Sure outsourcing is easy and what the Gov likes to do, but if its a barrier to outcomes, rather than publicly bully a company, why not insource the project.
There has to be more to the story. IMO
@Walker Power never takes the hard way—it always takes what doesn't belong to it. For example, Linux—Android was the first with open source code, but Android is now a third closed. Google Services is a layer over Android that's already almost completely closed. A little more and there will be total dictatorship, but they should all be open according to the license. Same with Apple, but no—power and corporations are enemy number one in the world. It's the same with AI—power doesn't want to do anything. It's much easier to force them. #ai #linux #ios #android
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topicR relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
@Walker Power never takes the hard way—it always takes what doesn't belong to it. For example, Linux—Android was the first with open source code, but Android is now a third closed. Google Services is a layer over Android that's already almost completely closed. A little more and there will be total dictatorship, but they should all be open according to the license. Same with Apple, but no—power and corporations are enemy number one in the world. It's the same with AI—power doesn't want to do anything. It's much easier to force them. #ai #linux #ios #android
@newsgroup all true and as a frequent F-Droid user I am pissed at what Google is about to do.
Overall, I had assumed the Pentagon had already developed a Killer AI.
Are they saying that between all the branches of military and intelligence (CIA, NSA, Pentagon, DARPA, etc), that none of them have created an inhouse killer AI yet? That seems like a basic military project in this AI world.
Maybe they tried and could not get it to work.
-
@newsgroup all true and as a frequent F-Droid user I am pissed at what Google is about to do.
Overall, I had assumed the Pentagon had already developed a Killer AI.
Are they saying that between all the branches of military and intelligence (CIA, NSA, Pentagon, DARPA, etc), that none of them have created an inhouse killer AI yet? That seems like a basic military project in this AI world.
Maybe they tried and could not get it to work.
@Walker I'm sure they have their own proprietary AI models, but compared to corporate ones they're smoking on the sidelines
I was actually writing an article about F-Droid today and I use it too. Since I'm a developer, I've reviewed all my past mistakes and now I want to create more open source. But since I have obligations to myself and to my partners, and I'm a person who loves keeping my promises, we have projects I can't open because it would violate signed agreements. So for the future I plan to write only open source code. Happy to meet like-minded people—already subscribed, the content is great. -
R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
