Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I genuinely do not understand the point of "humanoid" robots.

I genuinely do not understand the point of "humanoid" robots.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
robotsdesignautomation
2 Posts 2 Posters 11 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • lonm@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
    lonm@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
    lonm@social.vivaldi.net
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I genuinely do not understand the point of "humanoid" robots. If there's a task you need to automate, surely the best approach is to change the task to fit cheap robots, not to build expensive error-prone human-like machines?
    The examples in this latest article make no sense.
    Handling cargo containers: The whole point of containers is to make it easier for machines to handle them without human limbs.
    Ground support equipment: surely wheels would be more useful than legs?
    Even the example of cleaning cabins: isn't that basically a glorified roomba?

    What am I missing?

    Link Preview Image
    Japan Airlines trials humanoid robots as ground handlers

    These robots may in future help clean cabins and operate ground support equipment.

    favicon

    BBC News (www.bbc.co.uk)

    #robots #ai #design #automation

    hannab@social.vir.groupH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lonm@social.vivaldi.netL lonm@social.vivaldi.net

      I genuinely do not understand the point of "humanoid" robots. If there's a task you need to automate, surely the best approach is to change the task to fit cheap robots, not to build expensive error-prone human-like machines?
      The examples in this latest article make no sense.
      Handling cargo containers: The whole point of containers is to make it easier for machines to handle them without human limbs.
      Ground support equipment: surely wheels would be more useful than legs?
      Even the example of cleaning cabins: isn't that basically a glorified roomba?

      What am I missing?

      Link Preview Image
      Japan Airlines trials humanoid robots as ground handlers

      These robots may in future help clean cabins and operate ground support equipment.

      favicon

      BBC News (www.bbc.co.uk)

      #robots #ai #design #automation

      hannab@social.vir.groupH This user is from outside of this forum
      hannab@social.vir.groupH This user is from outside of this forum
      hannab@social.vir.group
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @LonM If the critic is right, then the billions poured into humanoid robots might just be a massive bet that our entire world-from shipping ports to airplane cabins-is stubbornly designed for human bodies, making it cheaper to copy the human than redesign the world.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups