Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. When I was young, I learned, and was taught, how to make the computer to work efficiently and correctly, in my computer science degree.

When I was young, I learned, and was taught, how to make the computer to work efficiently and correctly, in my computer science degree.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
15 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

    When I was young, I learned, and was taught, how to make the computer to work efficiently and correctly, in my computer science degree.

    Now it is the opposite. Do brute-force search using giant farms of computers, using a huge amount of energy and water, and get results that are not guaranteed to be correct any more.

    And I was discussing with a colleague this morning that my 2001 laptop ran faster than my current top-range computer for everyday tasks. Of course, it had a much worse CPU and much less ram. And of course the software for things we still do *now* was much faster *then*.

    I still have that laptop from that time running Ubuntu 4.10 from 2004 in my personal museum of computers. You would be amazed how responsive the system is for everything we do every day with a computer. I recently tested it with my son, because he was curious to see how things were then.

    So we are using more powerful hardware for getting a poorer experience.

    The new computers are much better for some things, such as running Agda. But, for everything else I happen to do, they were just as fast, because people programmed them in a more efficient way (they had to - there was no other way).

    L This user is from outside of this forum
    L This user is from outside of this forum
    luc0x61@mastodon.gamedev.place
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @MartinEscardo Even back then there were horrible examples. See Windows 2000, which was able to make slow any fast machine of the time. Although Microsoft had a great idea: label it as "Professional". Every "serious" user had to go with a deadly slow machine, but running a professional OS! 😅

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
      synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
      synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @rl_dane @MartinEscardo the whole "curl [url-quoted-by-rando-foreign-remote-anon-strangers-incented-to-betray-you-and-filter-for-gullibility] | sudo bash" trend just blows my frickin mind.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

        When I was young, I learned, and was taught, how to make the computer to work efficiently and correctly, in my computer science degree.

        Now it is the opposite. Do brute-force search using giant farms of computers, using a huge amount of energy and water, and get results that are not guaranteed to be correct any more.

        And I was discussing with a colleague this morning that my 2001 laptop ran faster than my current top-range computer for everyday tasks. Of course, it had a much worse CPU and much less ram. And of course the software for things we still do *now* was much faster *then*.

        I still have that laptop from that time running Ubuntu 4.10 from 2004 in my personal museum of computers. You would be amazed how responsive the system is for everything we do every day with a computer. I recently tested it with my son, because he was curious to see how things were then.

        So we are using more powerful hardware for getting a poorer experience.

        The new computers are much better for some things, such as running Agda. But, for everything else I happen to do, they were just as fast, because people programmed them in a more efficient way (they had to - there was no other way).

        synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @MartinEscardo I'm writing book on HPC. but I do worry about a possible shrinking market demand by people who might ever care anymore. I am gambling there will always be a slice, and niches, where it will always matter

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
          synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
          synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @rl_dane @MartinEscardo and then... Enter The Vibe Coding. "its so awesome I can ask Claude to whip up my own personal ideal Time Tracking app for me!" Consequence: the biz now has 1000 completely distinct Time Tracking app codebases in use, each with wildly different arch and third party lib/service dependencies, and..." *nightmare*

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

            When I was young, I learned, and was taught, how to make the computer to work efficiently and correctly, in my computer science degree.

            Now it is the opposite. Do brute-force search using giant farms of computers, using a huge amount of energy and water, and get results that are not guaranteed to be correct any more.

            And I was discussing with a colleague this morning that my 2001 laptop ran faster than my current top-range computer for everyday tasks. Of course, it had a much worse CPU and much less ram. And of course the software for things we still do *now* was much faster *then*.

            I still have that laptop from that time running Ubuntu 4.10 from 2004 in my personal museum of computers. You would be amazed how responsive the system is for everything we do every day with a computer. I recently tested it with my son, because he was curious to see how things were then.

            So we are using more powerful hardware for getting a poorer experience.

            The new computers are much better for some things, such as running Agda. But, for everything else I happen to do, they were just as fast, because people programmed them in a more efficient way (they had to - there was no other way).

            unfmeghan@dmv.communityU This user is from outside of this forum
            unfmeghan@dmv.communityU This user is from outside of this forum
            unfmeghan@dmv.community
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @MartinEscardo I do feel like the entire field of Computer Science has completely abandoned the principle of efficiency.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
              synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
              synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @rl_dane @MartinEscardo yeah I have a love/hate relationship with Docker and their image ecosystem because of it. images and containers are wise ideas and net wins in some cases when "just so" and they they are horribly unwise in others. too many folks dont seem to see the nuance of those distinction boundaries. they can bite

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • isaackuo@spacey.spaceI isaackuo@spacey.space

                @MichaelTBacon @MartinEscardo You know what drives me nuts? Volume control.

                Once upon a time, you could change volume INSTANTLY. It was just a cheap potentiometer. If something was TOO LOUD, you could turn the pot and THAT PROBLEM was solved just like that.

                But on a modern laptop? Or "smart" phone? Or almost anything? Yeah, good luck turning down the volume in a humanly reasonable amount of time.

                The CPU can do like millions of things per second, but not one of them is turning down the volume

                keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #11
                @isaackuo @MichaelTBacon @MartinEscardo As corporate tech enshittifies, I hope the smallscale hacker tech that is increasingly and delightfully able to take its functional place really embraces bringing back physical buttons and knobs, and I have some genuine optimism it will.
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                  synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                  synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @rl_dane @MartinEscardo lately I feel like I'm witnessing millions of people who, all at once, and who are demonstrably lazy or ignorant or reckless, or all three, decide it would be incredibly wise for them to start juggling chainsaws

                  "This... will not end well."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                    When I was young, I learned, and was taught, how to make the computer to work efficiently and correctly, in my computer science degree.

                    Now it is the opposite. Do brute-force search using giant farms of computers, using a huge amount of energy and water, and get results that are not guaranteed to be correct any more.

                    And I was discussing with a colleague this morning that my 2001 laptop ran faster than my current top-range computer for everyday tasks. Of course, it had a much worse CPU and much less ram. And of course the software for things we still do *now* was much faster *then*.

                    I still have that laptop from that time running Ubuntu 4.10 from 2004 in my personal museum of computers. You would be amazed how responsive the system is for everything we do every day with a computer. I recently tested it with my son, because he was curious to see how things were then.

                    So we are using more powerful hardware for getting a poorer experience.

                    The new computers are much better for some things, such as running Agda. But, for everything else I happen to do, they were just as fast, because people programmed them in a more efficient way (they had to - there was no other way).

                    nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nilajones@zeroes.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @MartinEscardo

                    Yeah I remember how long I put off updating Microsoft word, because the new version was 30 MB and that just seemed so ridiculously bloaty

                    It was the size a hard drive used to be, a few years previous!

                    Goodness knows what size it is now. I haven't used it in about 25 years

                    els@sfba.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                      When I was young, I learned, and was taught, how to make the computer to work efficiently and correctly, in my computer science degree.

                      Now it is the opposite. Do brute-force search using giant farms of computers, using a huge amount of energy and water, and get results that are not guaranteed to be correct any more.

                      And I was discussing with a colleague this morning that my 2001 laptop ran faster than my current top-range computer for everyday tasks. Of course, it had a much worse CPU and much less ram. And of course the software for things we still do *now* was much faster *then*.

                      I still have that laptop from that time running Ubuntu 4.10 from 2004 in my personal museum of computers. You would be amazed how responsive the system is for everything we do every day with a computer. I recently tested it with my son, because he was curious to see how things were then.

                      So we are using more powerful hardware for getting a poorer experience.

                      The new computers are much better for some things, such as running Agda. But, for everything else I happen to do, they were just as fast, because people programmed them in a more efficient way (they had to - there was no other way).

                      valpackett@social.treehouse.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                      valpackett@social.treehouse.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                      valpackett@social.treehouse.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @MartinEscardo outside of the slop thing, that's quite the rose-tinted-glasses take

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nilajones@zeroes.caN nilajones@zeroes.ca

                        @MartinEscardo

                        Yeah I remember how long I put off updating Microsoft word, because the new version was 30 MB and that just seemed so ridiculously bloaty

                        It was the size a hard drive used to be, a few years previous!

                        Goodness knows what size it is now. I haven't used it in about 25 years

                        els@sfba.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                        els@sfba.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                        els@sfba.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @NilaJones @MartinEscardo Remember when you opened your 25k MSWord files and they suddenly expanded to 250k? That was the beginning of the end.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups