Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So I'm thinking about what to use as the guts of the gen2 reworkctf board.

So I'm thinking about what to use as the guts of the gen2 reworkctf board.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
19 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
    azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
    azonenberg@ioc.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @jpm I'm targeting OSHPark 4 layer design rules but nothing will be fast enough to care about impedance so it should be totally doable on JLC.

    There will be an 0201 and probably an 01005 on the board, but as bare footprints where the challenge is "populate it by hand". No components necessary for functionality of the board as a whole will be smaller than 0402.

    The challenge isn't "populate the BGA" lol.

    The challenges will be more like "ball C3 was accidentally left unconnected, route it to this resistor as you see fit".

    There will be two difficulty levels of that challenge, one you are allowed to do on a bare PCB before stuffing the BGA.

    The higher point version of the same challenge you are not allowed to do until the BGA is already populated (simulating late discovery of the defect), at which point you either have to do some kind of root-canal back drill operation without removing the chip, or pull the BGA, reball it, rework the site, and put it back on.

    azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

      So I'm thinking about what to use as the guts of the gen2 reworkctf board.

      I want a BGA of relatively large (0.8 or 1 mm) pitch to allow practicing of BGA site rework without being 11/10 difficulty level right out of the gate.

      The STM32H750XBH6 is $12.39 at digikey in single units, sub $10 in higher volume, although currently sold out until April (I have enough on the shelf to prototype with), 0.8mm depopulated 265-BGA.

      The cheapest Xilinx part in a 1mm FTGB196 is the XC7S6-1FTGB196C at $20.94 qty1 price.

      Any other ideas? A lot of the really low cost parts are like 0.5mm or WLCSP which defeats the point of using a large pitch to make the challenge not too crazy difficult.

      0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0h00000000@ioc.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @azonenberg if you look you can find some $1 ST BGAs at Mouser. Also try looking at Arrow, they have low prices on select ST parts.

      azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

        @jpm I'm targeting OSHPark 4 layer design rules but nothing will be fast enough to care about impedance so it should be totally doable on JLC.

        There will be an 0201 and probably an 01005 on the board, but as bare footprints where the challenge is "populate it by hand". No components necessary for functionality of the board as a whole will be smaller than 0402.

        The challenge isn't "populate the BGA" lol.

        The challenges will be more like "ball C3 was accidentally left unconnected, route it to this resistor as you see fit".

        There will be two difficulty levels of that challenge, one you are allowed to do on a bare PCB before stuffing the BGA.

        The higher point version of the same challenge you are not allowed to do until the BGA is already populated (simulating late discovery of the defect), at which point you either have to do some kind of root-canal back drill operation without removing the chip, or pull the BGA, reball it, rework the site, and put it back on.

        azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
        azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
        azonenberg@ioc.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @jpm This is not a "learn to solder" board it's a "practice the skills you'll need to do circuit edits on high end multilayer boards full of BGAs and fine pitch parts" board.

        Being able to populate QFNs and BGAs by hand is a prerequisite you are assumed to have down cold before you even pick up the challenge board.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 0h00000000@ioc.exchange

          @azonenberg if you look you can find some $1 ST BGAs at Mouser. Also try looking at Arrow, they have low prices on select ST parts.

          azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          azonenberg@ioc.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @0h00000000 most of the really cheap stuff is WLCSP or 0.5mm IME. Got any 0.8mm parts to suggest? specifically STM32s?

          0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

            @0h00000000 most of the really cheap stuff is WLCSP or 0.5mm IME. Got any 0.8mm parts to suggest? specifically STM32s?

            0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
            0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
            0h00000000@ioc.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @azonenberg TFBGA64 STM32L0 - $2.76 at qty 10.

            Link Preview Image
            Access to this page has been denied.

            favicon

            (www.mouser.com)

            $2.38 at qty 1:
            https://www.arrow.com/en/products/stm32l071rbh6tr/stmicroelectronics.html

            azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 0h00000000@ioc.exchange

              @azonenberg TFBGA64 STM32L0 - $2.76 at qty 10.

              Link Preview Image
              Access to this page has been denied.

              favicon

              (www.mouser.com)

              $2.38 at qty 1:
              https://www.arrow.com/en/products/stm32l071rbh6tr/stmicroelectronics.html

              azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              azonenberg@ioc.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @0h00000000 That's an 0.5mm pitch package

              azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

                @0h00000000 That's an 0.5mm pitch package

                azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                azonenberg@ioc.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @0h00000000 Drilling out new vias or adding tracks between balls on 0.5mm is much harder than 0.8 or 1 (something *I* haven't attempted to date). I'm not going to put that on this challenge.

                Maybe a sequel if some Chinese phone repair guy thinks it's too easy.

                azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

                  @0h00000000 Drilling out new vias or adding tracks between balls on 0.5mm is much harder than 0.8 or 1 (something *I* haven't attempted to date). I'm not going to put that on this challenge.

                  Maybe a sequel if some Chinese phone repair guy thinks it's too easy.

                  azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  azonenberg@ioc.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @0h00000000 The smallest / cheapest 0.8mm packages I know of are like the UFBGA144 for F4s.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

                    So I'm thinking about what to use as the guts of the gen2 reworkctf board.

                    I want a BGA of relatively large (0.8 or 1 mm) pitch to allow practicing of BGA site rework without being 11/10 difficulty level right out of the gate.

                    The STM32H750XBH6 is $12.39 at digikey in single units, sub $10 in higher volume, although currently sold out until April (I have enough on the shelf to prototype with), 0.8mm depopulated 265-BGA.

                    The cheapest Xilinx part in a 1mm FTGB196 is the XC7S6-1FTGB196C at $20.94 qty1 price.

                    Any other ideas? A lot of the really low cost parts are like 0.5mm or WLCSP which defeats the point of using a large pitch to make the challenge not too crazy difficult.

                    ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                    ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                    ldcd@social.treehouse.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @azonenberg

                    Not serious (terrible availability):

                    Link Preview Image
                    LCMXO2-1200UHC-4FTG256C | Lattice | Price | In Stock | LCSC Electronics

                    LCMXO2-1200UHC-4FTG256C by Lattice - In-stock components at LCSC. Price from $4.3437. Free access LCMXO2-1200UHC-4FTG256C datasheet, Package, pinout diagrams, and BOM tools.

                    favicon

                    LCSC Electronics (www.lcsc.com)

                    ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL ldcd@social.treehouse.systems

                      @azonenberg

                      Not serious (terrible availability):

                      Link Preview Image
                      LCMXO2-1200UHC-4FTG256C | Lattice | Price | In Stock | LCSC Electronics

                      LCMXO2-1200UHC-4FTG256C by Lattice - In-stock components at LCSC. Price from $4.3437. Free access LCMXO2-1200UHC-4FTG256C datasheet, Package, pinout diagrams, and BOM tools.

                      favicon

                      LCSC Electronics (www.lcsc.com)

                      ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                      ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                      ldcd@social.treehouse.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @azonenberg ECP5-12F used to fit this bill but they've hiked prices and reduced availability 😕

                      azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL ldcd@social.treehouse.systems

                        @azonenberg ECP5-12F used to fit this bill but they've hiked prices and reduced availability 😕

                        azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        azonenberg@ioc.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @ldcd i feel like i could probably save a dollar or two with a slightly smaller stm32 but the h750 is one i have on the shelf which counts for something too

                        ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

                          @ldcd i feel like i could probably save a dollar or two with a slightly smaller stm32 but the h750 is one i have on the shelf which counts for something too

                          ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                          ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                          ldcd@social.treehouse.systems
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @azonenberg the H7s are just really nice all around

                          azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL ldcd@social.treehouse.systems

                            @azonenberg the H7s are just really nice all around

                            azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                            azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                            azonenberg@ioc.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @ldcd yeah it's just overkill lol.

                            I might borrow an idea from @cccpresser and break out some IOs to connectors so it becomes a useful devkit not ewaste when you're done with the challenge. That makes a bigger mcu easier to justify

                            ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

                              @ldcd yeah it's just overkill lol.

                              I might borrow an idea from @cccpresser and break out some IOs to connectors so it becomes a useful devkit not ewaste when you're done with the challenge. That makes a bigger mcu easier to justify

                              ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                              ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                              ldcd@social.treehouse.systems
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @azonenberg @cccpresser I mean yeah I think that's absolutely a good idea

                              azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL ldcd@social.treehouse.systems

                                @azonenberg @cccpresser I mean yeah I think that's absolutely a good idea

                                azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                azonenberg@ioc.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @ldcd @cccpresser yep it is, it never occurred to me on the first iteration but for rev 2 I'll definitely be doing it

                                ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

                                  @ldcd @cccpresser yep it is, it never occurred to me on the first iteration but for rev 2 I'll definitely be doing it

                                  ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ldcd@social.treehouse.systems
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @azonenberg @cccpresser 0.4 but long pads https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/epc/EPC8009/4990585

                                  Could have a little switch mode for funzies.

                                  I think having a dev board you've done some rework on makes people more likely to use it

                                  azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ldcd@social.treehouse.systemsL ldcd@social.treehouse.systems

                                    @azonenberg @cccpresser 0.4 but long pads https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/epc/EPC8009/4990585

                                    Could have a little switch mode for funzies.

                                    I think having a dev board you've done some rework on makes people more likely to use it

                                    azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    azonenberg@ioc.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @ldcd Lol.

                                    I specifically need a large-ish pitch BGA (which makes sense to be the main processor of the system) for BGA site rework challenges though.

                                    I think I'm gonna run with the H750.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • azonenberg@ioc.exchangeA azonenberg@ioc.exchange

                                      @0h00000000 That's an 0.5mm pitch package

                                      0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                      0h00000000@ioc.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                      0h00000000@ioc.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @azonenberg ST "TFBGA" should be .8mm, but the dist may have the info wrong.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups