LLMs and AI are notoriously problematic in free and open-source software, so we've added an explicit anti-LLM clause to GNOME Calendar:
-
LLMs and AI are notoriously problematic in free and open-source software, so we've added an explicit anti-LLM clause to GNOME Calendar:
contributing: Link to CoC and add no-LLM statement (!725) · Merge requests · GNOME / gnome-calendar · GitLab
This is copied ad verbatum from libadwaita, which itself was introduced based on [1]. [1] https://discourse.gnome.org/t/loupe-no-longer-allows-generative-ai-contributions/27327
GitLab (gitlab.gnome.org)
-
LLMs and AI are notoriously problematic in free and open-source software, so we've added an explicit anti-LLM clause to GNOME Calendar:
contributing: Link to CoC and add no-LLM statement (!725) · Merge requests · GNOME / gnome-calendar · GitLab
This is copied ad verbatum from libadwaita, which itself was introduced based on [1]. [1] https://discourse.gnome.org/t/loupe-no-longer-allows-generative-ai-contributions/27327
GitLab (gitlab.gnome.org)
@TheEvilSkeleton
"Usage of vim is obviously problematic in open source software, so we've added an explicit emacs only policy to our project."It's the quality of the code that the person submits that matters. If some people use LLMs to submit worse code, that's a people problem.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic