Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time.

I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
45 Posts 40 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

    I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

    lkundrak@metalhead.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
    lkundrak@metalhead.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
    lkundrak@metalhead.club
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    @MartinEscardo hello sir

    i am not a mathematician, but the results look correct to me?

    in fact i feel like a 10x mathematician now, i can calculate and calculate all the time

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

      I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

      R This user is from outside of this forum
      R This user is from outside of this forum
      robinadams@mathstodon.xyz
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      @MartinEscardo What if we put the calculator into orbit?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

        I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

        multifact@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        multifact@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        multifact@floss.social
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @MartinEscardo Reminds me the early Pentium FDIV bug in the mid 90s: Recommended mitigation measures were to verify the computing results using an older but reliable 486.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

          I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

          nofollownoindex@mastodon.trueten.deN This user is from outside of this forum
          nofollownoindex@mastodon.trueten.deN This user is from outside of this forum
          nofollownoindex@mastodon.trueten.de
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          @MartinEscardo just give it autonomy and chain it to another autonomous calculator that verifies the results with an 80% accuracy.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

            I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

            noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
            noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
            noplasticshower@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @MartinEscardo that will make you a solid B student instead of a C- student

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

              I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmax@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @MartinEscardo Pentium based, I assume.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
              • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                tymwol@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                tymwol@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                tymwol@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @MartinEscardo just launch 100 calculators and pick the most common result, it should be fine

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                  I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                  emilianosandri@mastodon.bsd.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                  emilianosandri@mastodon.bsd.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                  emilianosandri@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @MartinEscardo The real question is: your calculator burns significant quantities of methane every time you press "="? 😏

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                    I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                    fbulow@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fbulow@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fbulow@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @MartinEscardo Can you somehow make the calculator physically bigger? Bigger isn't better but it is inevitable and innovation.

                    wakame@tech.lgbtW 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                      I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                      dirk@snac.ndrvn.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dirk@snac.ndrvn.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dirk@snac.ndrvn.nl
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21
                      does it also boil the ocean?
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fbulow@mastodon.socialF fbulow@mastodon.social

                        @MartinEscardo Can you somehow make the calculator physically bigger? Bigger isn't better but it is inevitable and innovation.

                        wakame@tech.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wakame@tech.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wakame@tech.lgbt
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        @fbulow @MartinEscardo

                        If the calculator is only correct 80% of the time, one could use two calculators, so that the correct result appears at least on one of the displays ~96% of the time.

                        As a side effect it would double the size.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                          I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                          ljwrites@writeout.inkL This user is from outside of this forum
                          ljwrites@writeout.inkL This user is from outside of this forum
                          ljwrites@writeout.ink
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @MartinEscardo much productivity, such efficiency wow! Clearly this is the future 😍

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • forster@mathstodon.xyzF forster@mathstodon.xyz

                            @MartinEscardo Have you already explicitly told your calculator to please calculate correctly? I've heard this helps.

                            cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cap_ybarra@beige.party
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @forster @MartinEscardo you have to tell it to pretend it is a really good senior calculator with 20 years of experience

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

                              @MartinEscardo my reports are correct 85% of the time but that's ok, my boss is happy to double check them before sending them to our customers!

                              joxe@tkm.eusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              joxe@tkm.eusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              joxe@tkm.eus
                              wrote last edited by
                              #25

                              @ehproque @MartinEscardo Even 95% if you burn the whole planet and then fill the orbit with data-center satellites

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                                I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                                odoruhako@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                odoruhako@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                odoruhako@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #26

                                @MartinEscardo These things get better and better. Might be correct 90% of the time by 2027!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                                  I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                                  mushroom_man@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mushroom_man@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mushroom_man@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @MartinEscardo we haven’t reached peak calculator yet, just think of what the future holds!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                                  • timwardcam@c.imT timwardcam@c.im

                                    @MartinEscardo I was taught to do at least an order-of-magnitude mental sanity check every time I used a calculator - there's always scope for pressing the wrong button.

                                    yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                    yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                    yacc143@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @TimWardCam @MartinEscardo There is always scope for errors.

                                    I love these discussions that assume humans are the golden benchmark that never makes mistakes or errors.

                                    As you correctly were taught, check your work if at all possible.

                                    And all the clever rules that apply to how to deal with outputs from algorithms apply to human output too. Potentially with modification, because humans can lie maliciously. And with that observation, let's close that argument with a round of “they eat the dogs”

                                    futureisfoss@fosstodon.orgF 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • martinescardo@mathstodon.xyzM martinescardo@mathstodon.xyz

                                      I have a calculator that is correct 80% of the time. But don't worry, every time I use it, I check the results myself.

                                      montgomerygator@fouroclockfarms.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      montgomerygator@fouroclockfarms.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      montgomerygator@fouroclockfarms.club
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @MartinEscardo Funny enough, for some calculations a real calculator and the iOS calculator disagree. The physical calculator does all operations left to right, where the iPhone calculator does all operations by order of operations resulting in different sums in the end.

                                      How many people knew that, and how many have trusted the calculator all these years?

                                      aspragg@ohai.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • forster@mathstodon.xyzF forster@mathstodon.xyz

                                        @MartinEscardo Have you already explicitly told your calculator to please calculate correctly? I've heard this helps.

                                        biogeek23@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        biogeek23@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        biogeek23@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @forster @MartinEscardo it's actually really simple, you just have to get the prompt correct. The calculator can only calculate what it's very specifically being asked to calculate, which is why it's very important to check and make sure you know the answer before you ask it the very specific question, so the answer is calculated correctly .

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • yacc143@mastodon.socialY yacc143@mastodon.social

                                          @TimWardCam @MartinEscardo There is always scope for errors.

                                          I love these discussions that assume humans are the golden benchmark that never makes mistakes or errors.

                                          As you correctly were taught, check your work if at all possible.

                                          And all the clever rules that apply to how to deal with outputs from algorithms apply to human output too. Potentially with modification, because humans can lie maliciously. And with that observation, let's close that argument with a round of “they eat the dogs”

                                          futureisfoss@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          futureisfoss@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          futureisfoss@fosstodon.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @yacc143 @TimWardCam @MartinEscardo

                                          > I love these discussions that assume humans are the golden benchmark that never makes mistakes or errors.

                                          No one ever said that lol 😂 Making mistakes is part of being human, but as we gain more life experience and expertise in an area the number of mistakes we make keep decreasing.

                                          Also human mistakes are very different from the kinds of mistakes LLMs make, this point always gets lost when people talk about it.

                                          yacc143@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups