A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext
-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber this is going to be an aspect of recursive pollution. #MLsec
Recursive Pollution hits the CISO Circuit | BIML
Cynthia Brumfield wrote an excellent, in-depth article for CSO on recursive pollution that is well worth a read. At BIML
Berryville Institute of Machine Learning (berryvilleiml.com)
-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber
️ La recherche biomédicale est vraiment l'homme malade de la science... -
@petersuber
️ La recherche biomédicale est vraiment l'homme malade de la science...A chaque fois qu'on me dit que l'IA c'est formidable parce que ça va soigner toutes les maladies... Oui, bon, en attendant ça bordélise la recherche biomédicale, surtout.
The purpose of a system is what it does.
-
E em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic -
A chaque fois qu'on me dit que l'IA c'est formidable parce que ça va soigner toutes les maladies... Oui, bon, en attendant ça bordélise la recherche biomédicale, surtout.
The purpose of a system is what it does.
@flomaraninchi @HydrePrever @petersuber
"Flagged references underwent sequential filters to minimise false positives: automated pattern detection removed parsing artefacts, and an LLM (Claude 3.5 Haiku; Anthropic, San Francisco, CA, USA) screened remaining candidates to distinguish genuine fabrications from formatting discrepancies such as informally abbreviated titles."
I don't know what level of trolling is this

-
@flomaraninchi @HydrePrever @petersuber
"Flagged references underwent sequential filters to minimise false positives: automated pattern detection removed parsing artefacts, and an LLM (Claude 3.5 Haiku; Anthropic, San Francisco, CA, USA) screened remaining candidates to distinguish genuine fabrications from formatting discrepancies such as informally abbreviated titles."
I don't know what level of trolling is this

-
@flomaraninchi @HydrePrever @petersuber
"Flagged references underwent sequential filters to minimise false positives: automated pattern detection removed parsing artefacts, and an LLM (Claude 3.5 Haiku; Anthropic, San Francisco, CA, USA) screened remaining candidates to distinguish genuine fabrications from formatting discrepancies such as informally abbreviated titles."
I don't know what level of trolling is this

-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber I guess it might be time to go back to the in-house hard-copy to determine what is true or false. We're seeing the death of information and the dumping of concocted half-truth of the most misleading kinds. That coupled with human over-confidence and over-reaching is a bit troubling.
-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber Threshold of trust long since breached ...
-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber but can we trust this?
-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber
Potential incentized correction : Discovery of a fake citation during review leads to instant rejection. -
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltextSo much for LLM and AI, but of course authors used to make up things long before…
-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber fake citations in published work or submitted work -
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltextThanks Gen-ai! You are truly a gift to science and the world!

-
@petersuber fake citations in published work or submitted work@petersuber looks like it's published work. All of this just shows how fake and broken the publishing industry is.
-
A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext@petersuber zomg no way
-
@flomaraninchi @HydrePrever @petersuber
"Flagged references underwent sequential filters to minimise false positives: automated pattern detection removed parsing artefacts, and an LLM (Claude 3.5 Haiku; Anthropic, San Francisco, CA, USA) screened remaining candidates to distinguish genuine fabrications from formatting discrepancies such as informally abbreviated titles."
I don't know what level of trolling is this

@djelouze @flomaraninchi @HydrePrever @petersuber
We are now, truly, in the Dark Ages.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic

