Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. current thoughts after experimenting with some proposed discord alternatives recently:matrix: despite the honourable efforts of instance maintainers, i actually think that client apps are the achilles heel of matrix.

current thoughts after experimenting with some proposed discord alternatives recently:matrix: despite the honourable efforts of instance maintainers, i actually think that client apps are the achilles heel of matrix.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
36 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA ari@fedi.arimelody.space

    current thoughts after experimenting with some proposed discord alternatives recently:

    matrix: despite the honourable efforts of instance maintainers, i actually think that client apps are the achilles heel of matrix. every app is missing features i would really rather have, even if the server supports them all. everything feels like a hack built on a hack, and its fragile ecosystem shows. i can't recommend it if you're moving from discord, but i welcome you to try it out and see if it works for you and your friends!

    signal: if your primary use for discord is DMs and group chats, you may feel right at home with signal! i just chatted with my girlfriend for about four hours with webcam and screenshare, and it was a very pleasant experience! do note that the desktop app is rough around the edges; signal is a mobile app first.

    mumble (in progress): i have a server i've kept as a voice chat fallback for discord for months- if i can convince my friends to Put Up With the huge interface downgrade, i'd love to test it on its strengths. its weaknesses are quite the blight, though. it's open-source, so i wonder could a third-party client claim superiority with a better UX and design.

    fluxer: evidently vibe-coded: the commit history dates back to early january with an inhumane amount of code in its first commit (1.4m lines of code across 9k files. ok bud). assuming that didn't kill it for you already, (bold take based on speculation. read the developer's own blog post on fluxer's development before making up your mind on this) i'm concerned about the long-term maintainability of the app. i expect it to be unstable for quite some time, and self-hosting is not recommended by the developer for the time being. on the upside, they seem like a nice fellow! no ill will here. the app's design also blatantly rips from discord, which i suppose is a selling point to some, but i'd personally like to see something new.

    stoat (ex. revolt): same "copying discord" comment from before applies. despite being open-source, it seems to sorely lack self-hosting support, which i consider a must-have for my future community chat app. it's failed to take hold of discord's marketshare since it launched, and i suspect there's a good reason for that.

    teamspeak: even ignoring controversial military ties, i echo similar sentiments to mumble, except that teamspeak also fails by being closed-source. for my purposes, it's mumble but worse. at least it's a bit prettier, i guess...

    ghost_desu@eepy.moeG This user is from outside of this forum
    ghost_desu@eepy.moeG This user is from outside of this forum
    ghost_desu@eepy.moe
    wrote last edited by
    #24

    @ari@fedi.arimelody.space When I started looking into it, I thought self hosting and encryption being annoying would be the main issue with matrix, but it's 100% the clients, they're fine but dear god it's not something I could use long term

    ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA ari@fedi.arimelody.space

      @Jes honestly i just don't think federation is a great fit for a community chat app. this may be a controversial take, but i'm actually perfectly happy with the independent silos provided by teamspeak, mumble, and almost all game servers. i don't really think retaining the rooms and members of dead servers is particularly useful, and i think attempting to build software that carries the burden of everyone else's activity like that in the first place was asking for trouble.

      jes@labyrinth.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jes@labyrinth.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jes@labyrinth.zone
      wrote last edited by
      #25
      @ari the only real way to do federation in chat apps is probably more like XMPP where it's a burden of the user to store chat logs
      jes@labyrinth.zoneJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA ari@fedi.arimelody.space

        @alexia i've edited my post to correct that statement. it was definitely wrong of me to lean on that assumption without reading deeper. i was unaware of this blog post at the time and kinda rushed a surface-level evaluation of fluxer as i already wasn't a huge fan of the "discord-like" model.

        that's definitely a blunder on my part, and i think the best thing i can do is give it a better chance so i can evaluate it more fairly. i'll likely make a successor to this original post when i have a greater idea of the options available, with fluxer as a particular point of interest!

        alexia@app.wafrn.netA This user is from outside of this forum
        alexia@app.wafrn.netA This user is from outside of this forum
        alexia@app.wafrn.net
        wrote last edited by
        #26

        oh, ty!! not sure if the edit federated only after I replied or if it was bad timing on my part

        ty nonetheless!

        ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jes@labyrinth.zoneJ jes@labyrinth.zone
          @ari the only real way to do federation in chat apps is probably more like XMPP where it's a burden of the user to store chat logs
          jes@labyrinth.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jes@labyrinth.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jes@labyrinth.zone
          wrote last edited by
          #27
          @ari but yeah connecting directly to servers for chats seems to be the most efficient way of doing it if chat history is a concern
          ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA ari@fedi.arimelody.space

            @fiore fwiw, while looking into matrix hosting, i found that a webRTC connection over relays (see TURN) was the preferred method of setting up VOIP.

            while it would sidestep stock mumble quite substantially, if the architecture is designed to be extensible enough, i don't see why a mumble server couldn't just negotiate a relay link between participants to support even a simple video feed!

            fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
            fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
            fiore@rentseeking.quest
            wrote last edited by
            #28
            ithink murmur supporting smth like that could be cool yes

            or even just . a standalone thing webrtc server , which then the client implementation could make appear as tho they were part of the same interface . idk mumble is so cool and simple , you could pretty much have a full discord replacement if you mesh mumble irc and webrtc in the right way
            ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ghost_desu@eepy.moeG ghost_desu@eepy.moe

              @ari@fedi.arimelody.space When I started looking into it, I thought self hosting and encryption being annoying would be the main issue with matrix, but it's 100% the clients, they're fine but dear god it's not something I could use long term

              ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
              ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
              ari@fedi.arimelody.space
              wrote last edited by
              #29

              @ghost_desu i was genuinely surprised how much the onus was on clients. really ringing home that the FOSS space has more backend developers than frontend designers

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jes@labyrinth.zoneJ jes@labyrinth.zone
                @ari but yeah connecting directly to servers for chats seems to be the most efficient way of doing it if chat history is a concern
                ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                ari@fedi.arimelody.space
                wrote last edited by
                #30

                @Jes and perfectly sensible for 99% of what people use a community chat platform for- even on discord, where albeit outages are very infrequent, it's not the end of the world if our node goes down for a little while.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • alexia@app.wafrn.netA alexia@app.wafrn.net

                  oh, ty!! not sure if the edit federated only after I replied or if it was bad timing on my part

                  ty nonetheless!

                  ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ari@fedi.arimelody.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #31

                  @alexia i edited around the same time, no worries! regardless, i'll be taking more time to look into fluxer properly, following this.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fiore@rentseeking.questF fiore@rentseeking.quest
                    ithink murmur supporting smth like that could be cool yes

                    or even just . a standalone thing webrtc server , which then the client implementation could make appear as tho they were part of the same interface . idk mumble is so cool and simple , you could pretty much have a full discord replacement if you mesh mumble irc and webrtc in the right way
                    ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ari@fedi.arimelody.space
                    wrote last edited by
                    #32

                    @fiore oh yeah, to be clear, making it feel integrated would 100% be part of the plan there

                    fiore@rentseeking.questF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA ari@fedi.arimelody.space

                      @fiore oh yeah, to be clear, making it feel integrated would 100% be part of the plan there

                      fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fiore@rentseeking.quest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #33
                      tbh i like the idea of murmur being minimal as a server , thats what makes it cool and easy to host

                      but yea like whatever im making a nothingburger here its not like im gonna go and implement this myself , i should NOT be allowed near ui code
                      coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fiore@rentseeking.questF fiore@rentseeking.quest
                        tbh i like the idea of murmur being minimal as a server , thats what makes it cool and easy to host

                        but yea like whatever im making a nothingburger here its not like im gonna go and implement this myself , i should NOT be allowed near ui code
                        coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                        coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                        coolbean@brain.worm.pink
                        wrote last edited by
                        #34
                        @fiore @ari imma be real with you fiore. it does not actually need to be integrated with the voice chat program you can also just do screen sharing separately and have much greater odds of doing it well that way
                        coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC coolbean@brain.worm.pink
                          @fiore @ari imma be real with you fiore. it does not actually need to be integrated with the voice chat program you can also just do screen sharing separately and have much greater odds of doing it well that way
                          coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                          coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                          coolbean@brain.worm.pink
                          wrote last edited by
                          #35
                          @fiore @ari we dont need full featured conferencing software and i would argue are better off without it
                          ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC coolbean@brain.worm.pink
                            @fiore @ari we dont need full featured conferencing software and i would argue are better off without it
                            ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ari@fedi.arimelody.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ari@fedi.arimelody.space
                            wrote last edited by
                            #36

                            @coolbean @fiore i appreciate the "gadget" mindset, truly, but i think you'll find most users will get Really Upset with you if you tell them they have to use a separate app to get screenshare (a technology that can already coexist with voice chat just fine)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups