Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
86 Posts 55 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • yala@degrowth.socialY yala@degrowth.social

    @emilymbender

    @energisch_

    I stopped reading after "Google Search will drop users".

    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
    energisch_@troet.cafe
    wrote last edited by
    #52

    @yala fits perfectly @emilymbender

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

      But all the academic papers in the world showing why something is a bad idea won't stop companies from doing it, if it's profitable and/or fits into their quasi-religious beliefs that "AI" is the future, alas.

      So let's look at what Google is up to now, or at least says they are, via TechCrunch as stenographer:

      >>

      bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bms48@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #53

      @emilymbender I'll see you that and raise you cogent arguments about why behavioural change, not just education, are needed: https://www.asc.upenn.edu/news-events/news/largest-quantitative-synthesis-date-reveals-what-predicts-human-behavior-and-how-change-it Secondary reference from the APNIC blog about why IPv6 uptake has failed to reach certain expectations; which, ironically, is a part of the Internet relatively free from unwanted LLM scraper incursion, so far. The neat Hilbert curve based heat maps for IPv4 address spaces do not map so neatly to IPv6 because of the massively increased address space.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

        5 years ago (2021) Google researchers Metzler et al put out a preprint talking about how LLMs would change information access ("Rethinking Search"). It was full of TERRIBLE ideas, and Chirag Shah and I wrote a reply ("Situating Search"):

        Just a moment...

        favicon

        (dl.acm.org)

        >>

        bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bms48@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #54

        @emilymbender The point that their search product was already, to use the vernacular, crap, at this point, must have been lost on them, and Sundar Pichai in particular is responsible for this, as Ed Zitron has neatly elaborated upon elsewhere.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

          For one final shudder: Pichai here seems to want to think this is helping the world somehow? Gah.

          >>

          Link Preview Image
          bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bms48@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #55

          @emilymbender Infantalism is GAFAM's Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The comparisons with Aldous Huxley's seminal work betray themselves.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

            Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

            Link Preview Image
            Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

            Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

            favicon

            TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

            A short thread
            🧵>>

            rogue_cells@chaos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            rogue_cells@chaos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            rogue_cells@chaos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #56

            @emilymbender I want my printed encyclopedia back...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

              We don't have to buy this journalist's view of the future as already written by Google. Every time you click through to look at the actual source page you are helping to maintain our information ecosystem and build a better world.

              /fin (for now)

              tero@masto.aiT This user is from outside of this forum
              tero@masto.aiT This user is from outside of this forum
              tero@masto.ai
              wrote last edited by
              #57

              @emilymbender Thank you for this summary and analysis!

              aimeemaroux@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nicoe@mamot.frN nicoe@mamot.fr

                @Qybat @emilymbender if no one sees the ads, the companies will stop buying adspace. That's not what google wants. So I guess they will embed the ads in the search results.

                And the web will have finally evolved to be just like television. Just a bit more interactive because you'll be allowed to purchase directly what you see on screen (but probably nothing else).

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                simpleanecdote@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #58

                @nicoe @Qybat @emilymbender why "embed" ads when you can manipulate information in a way that curates the "search result" so it positions the paid-for "goals" as the only valid options or cast in the most "positive" light. Which is a problem when the business is motivated by ads revenue. And a bigger one when politics get involved. A reality distortion on a massive scale.

                nicoe@mamot.frN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                  Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                  Link Preview Image
                  Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                  Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                  favicon

                  TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                  A short thread
                  🧵>>

                  kimeragupta@todon.euK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kimeragupta@todon.euK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kimeragupta@todon.eu
                  wrote last edited by
                  #59

                  @emilymbender Six alternatives to Google Search hosted in Europe

                  Link Preview Image
                  European alternatives to Google Search | European Alternatives

                  Google is the biggest search engine in the world, from the USA-based company Alphabet.

                  favicon

                  European Alternatives (european-alternatives.eu)

                  I usually use Qwant and I'm very happy

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                    Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                    Link Preview Image
                    Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                    Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                    favicon

                    TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                    A short thread
                    🧵>>

                    casdeiro@15-15-15.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    casdeiro@15-15-15.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    casdeiro@15-15-15.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #60

                    @emilymbender #FuckAI #BoycottGoogle 'Nuff said! 😉

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                      We don't have to buy this journalist's view of the future as already written by Google. Every time you click through to look at the actual source page you are helping to maintain our information ecosystem and build a better world.

                      /fin (for now)

                      zekovski@pouet.chapril.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zekovski@pouet.chapril.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zekovski@pouet.chapril.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #61

                      @emilymbender
                      I guess you are already aware of the "CEO said a thing" concept.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tero@masto.aiT tero@masto.ai

                        @emilymbender Thank you for this summary and analysis!

                        aimeemaroux@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aimeemaroux@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aimeemaroux@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #62

                        @tero @emilymbender Yes, thank you, Dr. Bender!
                        Earlier, I had read that Google wanted to display webpages in a way AI determined was better than your own design but now I guess they won't even show any original webpages at all.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S simpleanecdote@mastodon.social

                          @nicoe @Qybat @emilymbender why "embed" ads when you can manipulate information in a way that curates the "search result" so it positions the paid-for "goals" as the only valid options or cast in the most "positive" light. Which is a problem when the business is motivated by ads revenue. And a bigger one when politics get involved. A reality distortion on a massive scale.

                          nicoe@mamot.frN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nicoe@mamot.frN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nicoe@mamot.fr
                          wrote last edited by
                          #63

                          @simpleanecdote @Qybat @emilymbender yeah that's what my embed was about, it will be just like product placing in the movies, you don't see them but they're there and they shape what's normal and desirable

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                            NO NO NO NO NO! Flashy polished looking webpages that no one has accountability for run absolutely counter to the common good when it comes to a health information ecosystem AND an informed public.

                            (Also, "Antigravity"? Yeah, you want us to think this is very cool science fiction and/or magic. Not buying it.)

                            >>

                            wcbdata@vis.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wcbdata@vis.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wcbdata@vis.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #64

                            @emilymbender It is "antigravity" in the marketing/community-management sense of "gravity." It'll definitely push everyone away...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                              We don't have to buy this journalist's view of the future as already written by Google. Every time you click through to look at the actual source page you are helping to maintain our information ecosystem and build a better world.

                              /fin (for now)

                              lukeharby@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lukeharby@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lukeharby@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #65

                              @emilymbender So long, Googles.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                                Link Preview Image
                                Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                                Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                                favicon

                                TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                                A short thread
                                🧵>>

                                thejessiekirk@ohai.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thejessiekirk@ohai.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thejessiekirk@ohai.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #66

                                @emilymbender Kagi 👍

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                  NO NO NO NO NO! Flashy polished looking webpages that no one has accountability for run absolutely counter to the common good when it comes to a health information ecosystem AND an informed public.

                                  (Also, "Antigravity"? Yeah, you want us to think this is very cool science fiction and/or magic. Not buying it.)

                                  >>

                                  mcahalane@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mcahalane@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mcahalane@mastodon.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #67

                                  @emilymbender so we won't know what's AI slop and what's a real site?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                    Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                                    Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                                    favicon

                                    TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                                    A short thread
                                    🧵>>

                                    bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bms48@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #68

                                    @emilymbender My bigger worry is if they start ensloppifying scholar.google.com. Zotero Connector eats it right up. Semantic Scholar isn't a patch on it for grabbing bibliographic records and tracking references, I have seen noticeable distortion in its results. Their pipeline is somewhat ML driven but they do use LLM summaries. This is expected given the origins of the service. Provenance is everything.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                      Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                                      Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                                      favicon

                                      TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                                      A short thread
                                      🧵>>

                                      syntaxseed@phpc.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      syntaxseed@phpc.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      syntaxseed@phpc.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #69

                                      @emilymbender These companies desperately want to stop us from finding & enjoying each other's content. Walled gardens of social media & mega platforms weren't enough, now the search directories will be the ultimate walled garden.

                                      All built on stealing the work of everyone who's ever published anything online.

                                      Why would anyone create anything anymore? I already feel my own desire to blog is waning.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                        Here is where it really starts to show that this journalist is just lightly paraphrasing a press release. "Links will become an afterthought," will they? What is your evidence for that confident statement about the future?

                                        >>

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        fiar_light@beige.partyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fiar_light@beige.partyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fiar_light@beige.party
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #70

                                        @emilymbender Silly, you're acting like there's any need for links. To do what? Check the veracity of the AI-generated wisdom and information being provided to you by the high priests of Google?? Heresy! Blasphemy!! How durst thee???

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                          More stenography here. Google starting shoving the "AI Overviews" into query results as an opt-out situation. That is, you have to take action to have them not pop up. I don't doubt they are *shown to* 2.5 billion monthly users, but that doesn't mean they are used by as many or desired by them.

                                          >>

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizza
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #71

                                          @emilymbender, that was exactly the point at which I started configuring browsers to add “&udm=14” to all searches done via G💩💩gle.

                                          Most recent case? I noticed that Calibre does word lookup. It will happily do so via G💩💩gle; and, yes, the slop summary is shown.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups