Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
57 Posts 49 Posters 68 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

    Link Preview Image
    Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

    Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

    favicon

    road.cc (road.cc)

    kim_balfour@zirk.usK This user is from outside of this forum
    kim_balfour@zirk.usK This user is from outside of this forum
    kim_balfour@zirk.us
    wrote last edited by
    #47

    @dangillmor Laws for thee but not for me is, after all, the ethos of a rapidly encroaching religious techno fascism.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gezza@mastodon.ieG gezza@mastodon.ie

      @dangillmor
      Is it legitimate self defense if I carry a log splitter to clear the bike lane?

      ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      ovoao@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #48

      @gezza @dangillmor

      Do you swear to never use pedestrian sidewalks with your bike?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • bladecoder@androiddev.socialB bladecoder@androiddev.social

        @gogojack @dangillmor The discussion is not about autonomous cars driving over people, it's about cyclists being "doored" by autonomous cars programmed to illegally stop in bike lanes.

        ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        ovoao@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #49

        @bladecoder @gogojack @dangillmor

        Wouldn't it be the human passengers doing the dooring?

        bladecoder@androiddev.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
          kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
          kimlockhartga@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #50

          @sgail @dangillmor Aren't these the same self-driving taxis that drove straight into water, onto train tracks, ran over children, etc?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ovoao@mastodon.socialO ovoao@mastodon.social

            @mastodonmigration @dangillmor

            Are human taxi drivers also evil for letting you out by the roadside even if there is a bike lane?

            I smell #fakeoutrage

            d_reno@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            d_reno@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            d_reno@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #51

            @ovoao @mastodonmigration @dangillmor

            People are begging for something to be outraged about nowadays.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

              @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

              atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              atleagle@mastodon.online
              wrote last edited by
              #52

              @fenixmaster @dangillmor if convenience and "what I want" are the requirements for an action, then I see a LOT of damage to these cars soon

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                Link Preview Image
                Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                favicon

                road.cc (road.cc)

                rey@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                rey@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                rey@toot.cat
                wrote last edited by
                #53

                @dangillmor c'mon, you can't just drive in the cop-car-parking lane

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ovoao@mastodon.socialO ovoao@mastodon.social

                  @bladecoder @gogojack @dangillmor

                  Wouldn't it be the human passengers doing the dooring?

                  bladecoder@androiddev.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bladecoder@androiddev.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bladecoder@androiddev.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #54

                  @ovoao Yes. The article also mentions a failing system that is supposed to warn passengers before they step out.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                    Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                    favicon

                    road.cc (road.cc)

                    mausmalone@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mausmalone@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mausmalone@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #55

                    @dangillmor You know, a small rock hammer could easily fit in a jersey pocket.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                      Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                      favicon

                      road.cc (road.cc)

                      asbestos@pnw.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                      asbestos@pnw.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                      asbestos@pnw.zone
                      wrote last edited by
                      #56

                      @dangillmor
                      I'm thinking if one makes me stop because it's blocking the Bike lane, I'm going to be going around and standing in front of it for a while, while I gaze at my phone

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                        Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                        Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                        favicon

                        road.cc (road.cc)

                        idlebrain@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                        idlebrain@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                        idlebrain@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #57

                        @dangillmor unrelated, but I'm curious what London cabbies will think of this encroachment into their industry.
                        Will Waymo need to pass "The Knowledge" in order to be licensed as a cab in London?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups