a thing about dishonest arguments is that they are always trying to get you to accept the *framing* of the argument and not the specific point
-
a thing about dishonest arguments is that they are always trying to get you to accept the *framing* of the argument and not the specific point
-
a thing about dishonest arguments is that they are always trying to get you to accept the *framing* of the argument and not the specific point
like, spot the dishonest arguments behind these not-so-hidden framings
trans women are men
people are inherently toxic and need to be monitored and controlled when they associate
-
like, spot the dishonest arguments behind these not-so-hidden framings
trans women are men
people are inherently toxic and need to be monitored and controlled when they associate
the way to win the argument is to reject the framing, not to argue the point
trans women are women
people are inherently good and should be allowed to freely associate
-
the way to win the argument is to reject the framing, not to argue the point
trans women are women
people are inherently good and should be allowed to freely associate
there was a really good post going around on bluesky a while ago about how you should "be like kirby" and eat your opponents framing
-
there was a really good post going around on bluesky a while ago about how you should "be like kirby" and eat your opponents framing
@ana I guess that's why @JuliusGoat's newsletter is called The Reframe.
-
there was a really good post going around on bluesky a while ago about how you should "be like kirby" and eat your opponents framing
@ana linking it for reference: https://anthonymoser.github.io/writing/rhetoric/framing/kirby/2026/01/28/the-kirby-frame.html
-
there was a really good post going around on bluesky a while ago about how you should "be like kirby" and eat your opponents framing
@ana
️ Kirby! -
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
