Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I've finally updated my chart of historical levelized electricity generation costs in the US by type.

I've finally updated my chart of historical levelized electricity generation costs in the US by type.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
renewableenergy
4 Posts 2 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dan613@ottawa.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
    dan613@ottawa.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
    dan613@ottawa.place
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I've finally updated my chart of historical levelized electricity generation costs in the US by type. Renewables continue to be the cheapest overall, even being cheaper to build than to continue operating existing coal plants. Of note is the increasing price of wind, making it more expensive than solar at the moment. These are average costs, and individual costs will vary by location. #Renewable #Energy

    michaelgemar@mstdn.caM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    0
    • dan613@ottawa.placeD dan613@ottawa.place

      I've finally updated my chart of historical levelized electricity generation costs in the US by type. Renewables continue to be the cheapest overall, even being cheaper to build than to continue operating existing coal plants. Of note is the increasing price of wind, making it more expensive than solar at the moment. These are average costs, and individual costs will vary by location. #Renewable #Energy

      michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
      michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
      michaelgemar@mstdn.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @dan613 @StephenRees And yet Ontario is touting its investment in nuclear, and the feds are pushing pipelines.

      dan613@ottawa.placeD 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      0
      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
        R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      • michaelgemar@mstdn.caM michaelgemar@mstdn.ca

        @dan613 @StephenRees And yet Ontario is touting its investment in nuclear, and the feds are pushing pipelines.

        dan613@ottawa.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
        dan613@ottawa.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
        dan613@ottawa.place
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @michaelgemar @StephenRees Yes, new nuclear is a problem. Revamping old nuclear isn't that bad, though. There may be some value to nuclear later and it's not a bad idea to put some money into it now for R&D purposes. Also, Canada's CANDU reactors are cheaper to run and are inherently safer than the reactors in the US, since they don't produce weapon-grade material or require the refinement that got Iran in hot water. But we haven't built new nuclear in a while and there is a learning cost to overcome.

        michaelgemar@mstdn.caM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dan613@ottawa.placeD dan613@ottawa.place

          @michaelgemar @StephenRees Yes, new nuclear is a problem. Revamping old nuclear isn't that bad, though. There may be some value to nuclear later and it's not a bad idea to put some money into it now for R&D purposes. Also, Canada's CANDU reactors are cheaper to run and are inherently safer than the reactors in the US, since they don't produce weapon-grade material or require the refinement that got Iran in hot water. But we haven't built new nuclear in a while and there is a learning cost to overcome.

          michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
          michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
          michaelgemar@mstdn.ca
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @dan613 @StephenRees It would be silly to shut down current generation. However, I’m very dubious of building more. In principle small modular reactors might work well for remote communities without potential for renewables, but the tech seems plagued with problems. (For such communities, enhanced geothermal might be a better investment.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups