Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running.

We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
426 Posts 315 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

    We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

    "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

    "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

    PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

    -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

    -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
    ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
    -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
    -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
    -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
    -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
    -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

    Just a moment...

    favicon

    (www.privacyinternational.org)

    The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
    must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

    Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

    kzad_bhat@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kzad_bhat@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kzad_bhat@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #321

    @briankrebs I see a large rise in fishing trips from canada and mexico in u.s. waters..

    but how about. NO. simply.

    and this is what happens when ones pin up leads the DPRK and one desires nothing more than to emulate them. So who is scared of the communists now...?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

      We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

      "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

      "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

      PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

      -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

      -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
      ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
      -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
      -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
      -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
      -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
      -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

      Just a moment...

      favicon

      (www.privacyinternational.org)

      The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
      must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

      Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

      captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
      captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
      captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.world
      wrote last edited by
      #322

      @briankrebs

      it will be interesting to see how this affects the
      #FIFAWorldCup

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

        We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

        "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

        "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

        PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

        -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

        -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
        ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
        -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
        -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
        -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
        -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
        -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

        Just a moment...

        favicon

        (www.privacyinternational.org)

        The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
        must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

        Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

        ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
        ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
        ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
        wrote last edited by
        #323

        @briankrebs@infosec.exchange

        The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.
        Probably a silly question (and perhaps I read the privacyinternational.org article too quickly), but how does one, as a random US citizen, provide comment?

        I searched the PDF for "respon" to see if there was a URL or similar reference, but one didn't seem to be present?

        I guess Amazon won't need to plan for nearly as many attendees at this year's re:Invent (one wonders the impact on other US-hosted conferences, festivals, etc.).

        briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.orgM monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.org

          @mirabilos

          Donald Trump's DNA is 50% oompa lumpa.

          @briankrebs @lazyb0y @Wyatt_H_Knott @wendinoakland @zm

          kzad_bhat@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kzad_bhat@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kzad_bhat@chaos.social
          wrote last edited by
          #324

          @monkeyben @mirabilos @briankrebs @lazyb0y @Wyatt_H_Knott @wendinoakland @zm

          dont insult the oompa lumpa like that..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

            We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

            "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

            "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

            PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

            -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

            -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
            ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
            -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
            -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
            -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
            -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
            -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

            Just a moment...

            favicon

            (www.privacyinternational.org)

            The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
            must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

            Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

            mediocratese@climatejustice.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mediocratese@climatejustice.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mediocratese@climatejustice.social
            wrote last edited by
            #325

            @briankrebs No thank you.
            Hard pass.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

              @briankrebs@infosec.exchange

              The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.
              Probably a silly question (and perhaps I read the privacyinternational.org article too quickly), but how does one, as a random US citizen, provide comment?

              I searched the PDF for "respon" to see if there was a URL or similar reference, but one didn't seem to be present?

              I guess Amazon won't need to plan for nearly as many attendees at this year's re:Invent (one wonders the impact on other US-hosted conferences, festivals, etc.).

              briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
              briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
              briankrebs@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #326

              @ferricoxide there's an email address listed in the Federal Register entry: CBP_
              PRA@cbp.dhs.gov. Submissions have to include the OMB Control Number 1651-0111.

              ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • revk@toot.me.ukR revk@toot.me.uk

                @briankrebs No way I could comply as I use wildcard email addressed (and have hundreds of domains) meaning I literally use a different email address on every form and web site and have no way to know them all. I have also had allocated to me well over a million phone numbers (as part of a junk call thing) - I could probably get a list of those and see if I can blow up the ESTA web site perhaps. And I have no right to give other people's numbers to the US either - does anyone, legally?

                floppyplopper@todon.nlF This user is from outside of this forum
                floppyplopper@todon.nlF This user is from outside of this forum
                floppyplopper@todon.nl
                wrote last edited by
                #327

                @revk @briankrebs@infosec.exchange
                the EU authorities announcing they will arrest anyone returning from FIFA2026 for breaching GDPR will be quite a thing

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • crankyotter@disabled.socialC crankyotter@disabled.social

                  @briankrebs This is evil. Just straight evil. I guess the 4th amendment is vapor.

                  mistheart@masto.esM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mistheart@masto.esM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mistheart@masto.es
                  wrote last edited by
                  #328

                  @CrankyOtter
                  Most likely, when conforted about this point, they will say that the 4th can only be applied to USA citizens.
                  Then suddently they will forget how to read international treaties about tourists/business trips/scholarships and such...

                  @briankrebs

                  frantasaur@mastodon.ieF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                    We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                    "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                    "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                    PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                    -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                    -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                    ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                    -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                    -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                    -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                    -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                    -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                    Just a moment...

                    favicon

                    (www.privacyinternational.org)

                    The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                    must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                    Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                    darkpaw@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    darkpaw@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    darkpaw@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #329

                    @briankrebs Ha! LOLs. No freakin' way am I giving them that information.

                    I'll just travel to Canada instead. Much nicer country. Not fascist.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tgg303@cyberplace.socialT tgg303@cyberplace.social

                      @briankrebs right about now, no one should be going to the USA, the only language the 🟠 understands is money, he really doesn't care about people, no matter who they are.

                      en3py@onlyarts.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      en3py@onlyarts.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      en3py@onlyarts.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #330

                      @TGG303 @briankrebs given the numbers he's spitting, I'd doubt about his general understanding of numbers (and how percentages work).

                      But one thing sure: he knows how to make it work in his own bank account.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pesky_warlock@ioc.exchangeP pesky_warlock@ioc.exchange

                        @briankrebs Apart from tourism, this is completely counter to GDPR, and any international company that has operations in the US is not going to send employees over. They may reconsider investing in the US. This is so short-sighted and heavy handed, typical of this "Administration".

                        en3py@onlyarts.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                        en3py@onlyarts.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                        en3py@onlyarts.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #331

                        @pesky_warlock @briankrebs the times a US company violated GDPR rules... after Snowden's statements we shouldn't really expect anything else.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                          We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                          "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                          "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                          PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                          -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                          -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                          ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                          -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                          -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                          -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                          -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                          -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                          Just a moment...

                          favicon

                          (www.privacyinternational.org)

                          The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                          must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                          Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                          finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          finchhaven@sfba.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #332

                          @briankrebs

                          Looks like #CBP / #ICE is out in Italy doing a little advance work:

                          "US to send ICE agents to Winter Olympics, prompting Italian anger"

                          "The governor of Lombardy region, Attilio Fontana, sought to calm the situation, suggesting that ICE agents would be deployed in Italy to protect US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.Olympics, prompting Italian anger"

                          Which should be the work of the US Secret Service, last time I heard...

                          Here: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y29xzjdzvo

                          frantasaur@mastodon.ieF 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                            We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                            "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                            "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                            PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                            -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                            -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                            ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                            -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                            -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                            -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                            -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                            -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                            Just a moment...

                            favicon

                            (www.privacyinternational.org)

                            The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                            must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                            Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                            gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafeG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafeG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                            wrote last edited by
                            #333

                            @briankrebs

                            the "email addresses used in the last ten years" is ludicrous. I use catch-all email-addresses and hand out concocted addresses liberally. They expect me to remember every "joesblog@mydomain.example.com" address ever used?

                            And every family-member's phone-number used? I barely remember my wife's phone-number let alone relatives I sporadically call via the phone.

                            (I mean, the rest is pretty over-the-top too, so the whole "avoid the US" is good advice regardless, but some elements are nigh-impossible)

                            gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafeG drscriptt@oldbytes.spaceD 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • auxonic@ottawa.placeA auxonic@ottawa.place

                              @revk not to mention that the form validation would probably reject that short domain that gives your trouble sometimes

                              revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                              revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                              revk@toot.me.uk
                              wrote last edited by
                              #334

                              @auxonic Not mentioning the @fuck.me.uk email addresses 🙂

                              klefstadmyr@social.vivaldi.netK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • revk@toot.me.ukR revk@toot.me.uk

                                @briankrebs No way I could comply as I use wildcard email addressed (and have hundreds of domains) meaning I literally use a different email address on every form and web site and have no way to know them all. I have also had allocated to me well over a million phone numbers (as part of a junk call thing) - I could probably get a list of those and see if I can blow up the ESTA web site perhaps. And I have no right to give other people's numbers to the US either - does anyone, legally?

                                tautology@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tautology@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tautology@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #335

                                @revk @briankrebs Yeah I'm like you and have used hundreds of different email addresses, depending on context.

                                And in terms of family telephone numbers, what definition of family are they using, does this include spouse? Children? Siblings? Parents? Cousins? Niblings? I'm not certain I even have some of their phone numbers. What about if said family members are juvenile?

                                In terms of social media, what counts? Discord? Forums? What if my social media accounts (like FB and LI) is restricted, do I need to give them access to it?

                                Terrible idea.

                                revk@toot.me.ukR 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tautology@infosec.exchangeT tautology@infosec.exchange

                                  @revk @briankrebs Yeah I'm like you and have used hundreds of different email addresses, depending on context.

                                  And in terms of family telephone numbers, what definition of family are they using, does this include spouse? Children? Siblings? Parents? Cousins? Niblings? I'm not certain I even have some of their phone numbers. What about if said family members are juvenile?

                                  In terms of social media, what counts? Discord? Forums? What if my social media accounts (like FB and LI) is restricted, do I need to give them access to it?

                                  Terrible idea.

                                  revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  revk@toot.me.uk
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #336

                                  @tautology @briankrebs It is terrible, but there are people with no "social media", and whose phone is in fact a phone not a mobile computer. Would I even get an ESTA if I said I had no social media? And go me a dumb phone.

                                  revk@toot.me.ukR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • revk@toot.me.ukR revk@toot.me.uk

                                    @tautology @briankrebs It is terrible, but there are people with no "social media", and whose phone is in fact a phone not a mobile computer. Would I even get an ESTA if I said I had no social media? And go me a dumb phone.

                                    revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    revk@toot.me.uk
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #337

                                    @tautology @briankrebs To be honest, if I *had* to go to US (like that would happen) it would be worth changing my name, getting a new passport in that uniquely rare name, and getting a totally dumb phone on a totally new number, and going as an "oldie" - or even not having a phone.

                                    wink@chaos.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • farbel@mas.toF farbel@mas.to

                                      @briankrebs

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      ben@snac.benbuhse.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ben@snac.benbuhse.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ben@snac.benbuhse.com
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #338
                                      You have cpb instead of cbp 😛
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                                        @farbel Did you try to send to cbp_pra@cbp.dhs.gov? Did you get a bounce?

                                        ben@snac.benbuhse.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ben@snac.benbuhse.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ben@snac.benbuhse.com
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #339
                                        I was getting a bounce until I realized I was writing CPB_PRA instead of CBP_PRA 🤦

                                        CC: @farbel@mas.to
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafeG gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafe

                                          @briankrebs

                                          the "email addresses used in the last ten years" is ludicrous. I use catch-all email-addresses and hand out concocted addresses liberally. They expect me to remember every "joesblog@mydomain.example.com" address ever used?

                                          And every family-member's phone-number used? I barely remember my wife's phone-number let alone relatives I sporadically call via the phone.

                                          (I mean, the rest is pretty over-the-top too, so the whole "avoid the US" is good advice regardless, but some elements are nigh-impossible)

                                          gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #340

                                          A quick bit of shell-scripting against my Inbox maildir shows 38 unique addresses just there, and that doesn't consider all the mail in folders.

                                          Digging though the whole mail-tree turns up 461 unique addresses. 😑

                                          find ~/Mail -type f -name '*:*' -print0 |
                                          xargs -0 awk -F" *: *" '/^$/{nextfile} {$0 = tolower($0)} $1 =="to" || $1 == "cc" || $1 == "envelope-to"{print $2}' * |
                                          sed 's/.*<\([^>]*\)>.*/\1/g;s/, */,/g' |
                                          tr , '\012' |
                                          grep $MYDOMAIN |
                                          sort -u |
                                          wc -l

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups