Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The hidden beauty of vibe coding

The hidden beauty of vibe coding

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
19 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gatesvp@mstdn.caG gatesvp@mstdn.ca

    @gerrymcgovern ... they measure the capabilities of the engineering platform along with the expertise of the people using that platform.

    There are lots of companies with excellent engineers and crummy DORA scores because they don't have the institutional support to improve those metrics. Nor does the score mean the business is successful. You can have great DORA metrics and still lack for paying customers.

    "The other challenge here is that the incentives are misaligned,"

    But then he proceeds to list a bunch of examples for competing incentives. His examples of "misaligned" are really examples of "I would like to deliver less and get paid more"... /2

    gatesvp@mstdn.caG This user is from outside of this forum
    gatesvp@mstdn.caG This user is from outside of this forum
    gatesvp@mstdn.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @gerrymcgovern ...

    If there's an incentives problem here, it's that companies have been paying for a lot of BS rituals and they're discovering that the BS generating machine is undermining part of the ritual. Companies have also been getting away with under-specifying success in order to pad results as "good". But Gen AIs will "fill in" the under-specificity with made up data. Or they will fail to deliver anything into the gap that some human was hoping would be filled.

    But none of this is "misaligned". It's intentional ambiguity designed to protect business units. The AI is just exposing the BS for what it is.

    OP is kind of talking about that BS problem. But he's taking weird micro angles to view subsets of the problem without calling out the greater problem. He's not wrong, but he's also not really right either. 🤷🏻‍♂️ //

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

      The hidden beauty of vibe coding

      "It passed all the unit tests, the shape of the code looks right," he said. It's 3.7x more lines of code that performs 2,000 times worse than the actual SQLite. Two thousand times worse for a database is a non-viable product. It's a dumpster fire. Throw it away. All that money you spent on it is worthless."

      Link Preview Image
      AI still doesn't work very well in business, reckoning soon

      interview: Codestrap founders say we need to dial down the hype and sort through the mess

      favicon

      (www.theregister.com)

      arclight@oldbytes.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
      arclight@oldbytes.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
      arclight@oldbytes.space
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @gerrymcgovern You love to see it:
      "Insurers, he said, are already lobbying state-level insurance regulators to win a carve-out in business insurance liability policies so they are not obligated to cover AI-related workflows. "That kills the whole system," Deeks said."

      Someone will be left holding the bag when slop kills someone, bankrupts a business, or causes serious damage. Insurers will make sure it isn't them.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

        The hidden beauty of vibe coding

        "It passed all the unit tests, the shape of the code looks right," he said. It's 3.7x more lines of code that performs 2,000 times worse than the actual SQLite. Two thousand times worse for a database is a non-viable product. It's a dumpster fire. Throw it away. All that money you spent on it is worthless."

        Link Preview Image
        AI still doesn't work very well in business, reckoning soon

        interview: Codestrap founders say we need to dial down the hype and sort through the mess

        favicon

        (www.theregister.com)

        uplategeek@bitbang.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        uplategeek@bitbang.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        uplategeek@bitbang.social
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @gerrymcgovern message from management: I didn’t read your test report, but our AI assistant told us we should fire all but one software engineer and push to prod, whatever that means. Let us know how it goes, we’ll be at the money burning party our AI assistant scheduled for us.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dpnash@c.imD dpnash@c.im

          @gerrymcgovern The stats for the vibe-coded SQLite rewrite in Rust being literally thousands of times slower than SQLite are simply wild. Such as needing almost 2 seconds to do 100 single-ID lookups. I'm pretty sure I could improve on that operation just by slurping a CSV with unique row IDs into memory and doing a binary search on said row IDs. Would I want to? No, but I'm also not *trying* to build an actual RDB engine either.

          curious_carrot@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          curious_carrot@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          curious_carrot@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @dpnash @gerrymcgovern

          Do you have a link you would like to share about this 1000 times slower implementation of a SQLite instance?

          pmdj@mstdn.socialP mawhrin@circumstances.runM 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • poprox@social.lolP poprox@social.lol

            @PatrickTingen @gerrymcgovern "vibe coding" is a euphemism for plagiarism. even for personal projects or proofs of concept, plagiarism is unethical and impermissible. not to mention there's substantial cost and harm for every single prompt.

            circus_maximus@social.anoxinon.deC This user is from outside of this forum
            circus_maximus@social.anoxinon.deC This user is from outside of this forum
            circus_maximus@social.anoxinon.de
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @poprox @PatrickTingen @gerrymcgovern

            Given that, when a model is trained with GPL code, it has to be GPL'ed itself, would be fair.
            No fun to say, but I think copyright/IP issues have a long way to go until the whole thing is settled and needless to say, is has to be fair

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • poprox@social.lolP poprox@social.lol

              @PatrickTingen @gerrymcgovern "vibe coding" is a euphemism for plagiarism. even for personal projects or proofs of concept, plagiarism is unethical and impermissible. not to mention there's substantial cost and harm for every single prompt.

              steveclough@metalhead.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
              steveclough@metalhead.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
              steveclough@metalhead.club
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @poprox @PatrickTingen @gerrymcgovern The problem is that all coders take from other people, copy code, and vibe coding does this better, in theory.

              There is a lot of harm, and there are - IME - better ways of ding this. Or at least, there were, until they were all enshittified.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • curious_carrot@mastodon.socialC curious_carrot@mastodon.social

                @dpnash @gerrymcgovern

                Do you have a link you would like to share about this 1000 times slower implementation of a SQLite instance?

                pmdj@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pmdj@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pmdj@mstdn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @curious_carrot @dpnash @gerrymcgovern It's linked from the original Register article: https://medium.com/write-a-catalyst/an-ai-wrote-576-000-lines-to-replace-sqlite-7ea538826d72

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • curious_carrot@mastodon.socialC curious_carrot@mastodon.social

                  @dpnash @gerrymcgovern

                  Do you have a link you would like to share about this 1000 times slower implementation of a SQLite instance?

                  mawhrin@circumstances.runM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mawhrin@circumstances.runM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mawhrin@circumstances.run
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @curious_carrot @dpnash @gerrymcgovern yes. (and you have it too.)

                  oh, and it's 20000 times slower, actually.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                    The hidden beauty of vibe coding

                    "It passed all the unit tests, the shape of the code looks right," he said. It's 3.7x more lines of code that performs 2,000 times worse than the actual SQLite. Two thousand times worse for a database is a non-viable product. It's a dumpster fire. Throw it away. All that money you spent on it is worthless."

                    Link Preview Image
                    AI still doesn't work very well in business, reckoning soon

                    interview: Codestrap founders say we need to dial down the hype and sort through the mess

                    favicon

                    (www.theregister.com)

                    autoiue@mastodon.xn--cfa.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                    autoiue@mastodon.xn--cfa.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                    autoiue@mastodon.xn--cfa.xyz
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @gerrymcgovern The original article has it at 20000× worse x)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Your LLM Doesn't Write Correct Code. It Writes Plausible Code.

                    One of the simplest tests you can run on a database:

                    favicon

                    (blog.katanaquant.com)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                      The hidden beauty of vibe coding

                      "It passed all the unit tests, the shape of the code looks right," he said. It's 3.7x more lines of code that performs 2,000 times worse than the actual SQLite. Two thousand times worse for a database is a non-viable product. It's a dumpster fire. Throw it away. All that money you spent on it is worthless."

                      Link Preview Image
                      AI still doesn't work very well in business, reckoning soon

                      interview: Codestrap founders say we need to dial down the hype and sort through the mess

                      favicon

                      (www.theregister.com)

                      shelldozer@oldbytes.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shelldozer@oldbytes.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shelldozer@oldbytes.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @gerrymcgovern KLOC as a measurement of productivity has come back into fashion yet again, for the *umpteenth* time. We never learn. Welcome to the 1970s.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups