Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So my systems recently updated to rsync 3.4.3, and as soon as that happened my backup system - which does incremental backups using multiple --compare-dest= arguments - started to fail on anything but a full backup.

So my systems recently updated to rsync 3.4.3, and as soon as that happened my backup system - which does incremental backups using multiple --compare-dest= arguments - started to fail on anything but a full backup.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
79 Posts 61 Posters 234 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • chris@social.losno.coC chris@social.losno.co

    @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven Though I'm not sure how much the 10-ish % "efficiency gain" is when I can ask an agent to solve a problem for me in 5-15 minutes, or I can spend literally hours poring over a code base to understand what I need to do to fix it myself.

    distractal@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
    distractal@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
    distractal@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @chris @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven Here's my question... is it really, solving the problem for you? Like, actually? Given all of the costs in the full context of how it operates?

    I don't believe that it is.

    Can you trust everything it outputs? Are you able to catch any problems with it 100% of the time? Are you somehow able to avoid it anchoring your thinking around a particular method?

    Let's assume it does solve the problem, and that somehow a purely ethical AI is produced that magically solves the labor, environment, plagiarism issues, and that is correct 100% of the time.

    Even if it does, you are slowly eroding your ability to solve problems of that nature independent of the agent.

    No matter how careful you are, no matter how smart, how skilled, how well-versed.

    You cannot beat cognitive surrender.

    distractal@hachyderm.ioD chrispy@chaos.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • chris@social.losno.coC chris@social.losno.co

      @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven Though I'm not sure how much the 10-ish % "efficiency gain" is when I can ask an agent to solve a problem for me in 5-15 minutes, or I can spend literally hours poring over a code base to understand what I need to do to fix it myself.

      orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
      orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
      orb2069@mastodon.online
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @chris

      "Solve"

      @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • distractal@hachyderm.ioD distractal@hachyderm.io

        @chris @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven Here's my question... is it really, solving the problem for you? Like, actually? Given all of the costs in the full context of how it operates?

        I don't believe that it is.

        Can you trust everything it outputs? Are you able to catch any problems with it 100% of the time? Are you somehow able to avoid it anchoring your thinking around a particular method?

        Let's assume it does solve the problem, and that somehow a purely ethical AI is produced that magically solves the labor, environment, plagiarism issues, and that is correct 100% of the time.

        Even if it does, you are slowly eroding your ability to solve problems of that nature independent of the agent.

        No matter how careful you are, no matter how smart, how skilled, how well-versed.

        You cannot beat cognitive surrender.

        distractal@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        distractal@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        distractal@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @chris @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven So, given that we have NOT solved all those other problems, do you think there's even a 10% efficiency gain?

        I think I was pretty generous with 10%.

        chris@social.losno.coC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • distractal@hachyderm.ioD distractal@hachyderm.io

          @chris @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven So, given that we have NOT solved all those other problems, do you think there's even a 10% efficiency gain?

          I think I was pretty generous with 10%.

          chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
          chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
          chris@social.losno.co
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven I'm fighting cognitive surrender every day. Either I get tasks done quickly, or I just give up and don't do anything at all. I mean, I could just go back to wallowing in self destructive ideation for hours on end.

          glassresistor@sfba.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
          • jeremiahfieldhaven@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ jeremiahfieldhaven@mastodon.gamedev.place

            So my systems recently updated to rsync 3.4.3, and as soon as that happened my backup system - which does incremental backups using multiple --compare-dest= arguments - started to fail on anything but a full backup.

            Revert to 3.4.1 and it works.

            So I go look at the source in GitHub to see what might have changed, because there doesn't seem to be anything relevant in the changelog.

            Since 3.4.1, 36 commits by "tridge and claude"

            Oh for fuck's sakes.

            mxjaygrant@triangletoot.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
            mxjaygrant@triangletoot.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
            mxjaygrant@triangletoot.party
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @JeremiahFieldhaven oh damn it all

            running screaming into the woods never to be seen again is sounding more and more like a reasonable career path

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mavu@mastodon.socialM mavu@mastodon.social

              @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven on rsync, this is scary. It's getting to a point where just stopping updates for a while on crucial systems seems safer than applying them.

              mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              @mavu @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven basically, we already stopped upgrading to newer versions where ensloppification happens, but it’s now being backported under the guise of security fixes, ill though-out ones (or not-at-all in the case of slop). This is a problem.

              rsync is so critical, I wonder if there are people versed enough in it who could hard-fork the last workable pre-slop version and maintain it from there. No need for big fancy new features, just keep it working and safe and secure. (openrsync seems to be both incomplete and unportable at this point.)

              billchenchina@bcom.moeB jens@social.finkhaeuser.deJ 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • rf@mas.toR rf@mas.to

                @mavu @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven 3.4.3 looks like mostly security changes (couple bugs say security fixes broke their thing, so it might be the case for your problem). If you only ever rsync with trusted machines, you're all good, but more broadly sitting out future security fixes is less appealing than sitting out future features

                mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                @rf @mavu @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven not if they come with regressions 😕 then you’d rather mitigate instead of applying the broken patches.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chris@social.losno.coC chris@social.losno.co

                  @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven I'm fighting cognitive surrender every day. Either I get tasks done quickly, or I just give up and don't do anything at all. I mean, I could just go back to wallowing in self destructive ideation for hours on end.

                  glassresistor@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  glassresistor@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  glassresistor@sfba.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @chris @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven i dont think you know what those words mean

                  and if your solveing depression with AI well thats depressing and sounds like how people talk about alcohol

                  chris@social.losno.coC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mav@masto.hackers.townM mav@masto.hackers.town

                    @JeremiahFieldhaven
                    Oh damn it all. Tridge has fallen

                    brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brett_e_carlock@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brett_e_carlock@mastodon.online
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    @mav
                    @JeremiahFieldhaven
                    Been a while since LLM/AI was shoved into ArduPilot, which is a safety-critical sUAS firmware.

                    I have not taken my stuff out since I saw that land in the project.

                    Edit:
                    That was the only context in which I knew of tridge and his storied reputation for making safety-critical code.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • spitfire@mastodon.deS spitfire@mastodon.de

                      @JeremiahFieldhaven aw, goddamnit! 😠

                      arclight@oldbytes.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                      arclight@oldbytes.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                      arclight@oldbytes.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      @spitfire @JeremiahFieldhaven You beat me to it. What is wrong with programmers who should know better?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org

                        @mavu @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven basically, we already stopped upgrading to newer versions where ensloppification happens, but it’s now being backported under the guise of security fixes, ill though-out ones (or not-at-all in the case of slop). This is a problem.

                        rsync is so critical, I wonder if there are people versed enough in it who could hard-fork the last workable pre-slop version and maintain it from there. No need for big fancy new features, just keep it working and safe and secure. (openrsync seems to be both incomplete and unportable at this point.)

                        billchenchina@bcom.moeB This user is from outside of this forum
                        billchenchina@bcom.moeB This user is from outside of this forum
                        billchenchina@bcom.moe
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @mirabilos @mavu @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven There is also github.com/gokrazy/rsync which i haven't tested yet.

                        xdej@mamot.frX 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC chuckmcmanis@chaos.social

                          @JeremiahFieldhaven I strongly recommend (if you haven't already) point this out to the rsync maintainers. "Tridge" should have their commit privileges suspended until they can review AI slop.

                          phocks@bne.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phocks@bne.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phocks@bne.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @ChuckMcManis @JeremiahFieldhaven pretty sure Tridge is the original creator 🙃

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org

                            @mavu @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven basically, we already stopped upgrading to newer versions where ensloppification happens, but it’s now being backported under the guise of security fixes, ill though-out ones (or not-at-all in the case of slop). This is a problem.

                            rsync is so critical, I wonder if there are people versed enough in it who could hard-fork the last workable pre-slop version and maintain it from there. No need for big fancy new features, just keep it working and safe and secure. (openrsync seems to be both incomplete and unportable at this point.)

                            jens@social.finkhaeuser.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jens@social.finkhaeuser.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jens@social.finkhaeuser.de
                            wrote last edited by
                            #35

                            @mirabilos @mavu @cap_ybarra @JeremiahFieldhaven "versed enough" and "getting versed enough" are both options, IMHO.

                            It's likely fine to take some time with the next round of updates.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cap_ybarra@beige.partyC cap_ybarra@beige.party

                              @JeremiahFieldhaven fork everything, it's all slop now and needs new caretakers

                              tk@f.kawa-kun.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tk@f.kawa-kun.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tk@f.kawa-kun.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #36
                              @JeremiahFieldhaven @cap_ybarra Fork everything and host the forks as far away from GitHub as possible. D:<
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • glassresistor@sfba.socialG glassresistor@sfba.social

                                @chris @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven i dont think you know what those words mean

                                and if your solveing depression with AI well thats depressing and sounds like how people talk about alcohol

                                chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
                                chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
                                chris@social.losno.co
                                wrote last edited by
                                #37

                                @glassresistor @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven I must not know what any of that means, or I wouldn't have said it. You remind me of my brother, who compared my computer use with his gambling addiction. I'm sure those things are the same thing.

                                chris@social.losno.coC glassresistor@sfba.socialG A davidgerard@circumstances.runD 4 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • chris@social.losno.coC chris@social.losno.co

                                  @glassresistor @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven I must not know what any of that means, or I wouldn't have said it. You remind me of my brother, who compared my computer use with his gambling addiction. I'm sure those things are the same thing.

                                  chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  chris@social.losno.co
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #38

                                  @glassresistor @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven Is it not cognitive surrender if I want to turn my brain off on a regular basis? This thread is making me want to do that right now. I can do the next best thing and go play video games instead.

                                  glassresistor@sfba.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • chris@social.losno.coC chris@social.losno.co

                                    @glassresistor @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven Is it not cognitive surrender if I want to turn my brain off on a regular basis? This thread is making me want to do that right now. I can do the next best thing and go play video games instead.

                                    glassresistor@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    glassresistor@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    glassresistor@sfba.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #39

                                    @chris @distractal @sinbad @JeremiahFieldhaven could you define cognitive surrender?

                                    chris@social.losno.coC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jeremiahfieldhaven@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ jeremiahfieldhaven@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                      So my systems recently updated to rsync 3.4.3, and as soon as that happened my backup system - which does incremental backups using multiple --compare-dest= arguments - started to fail on anything but a full backup.

                                      Revert to 3.4.1 and it works.

                                      So I go look at the source in GitHub to see what might have changed, because there doesn't seem to be anything relevant in the changelog.

                                      Since 3.4.1, 36 commits by "tridge and claude"

                                      Oh for fuck's sakes.

                                      ecter@kind.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ecter@kind.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ecter@kind.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #40

                                      @JeremiahFieldhaven Even rsync... Software is over 😞

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        richlv@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #41

                                        @kauer @ChuckMcManis @JeremiahFieldhaven Might have been /s, given «odd humour» in the profile 🙂

                                        Also git, indirectly. For those who do not know, look it up.

                                        Tridge is a legend, and our legends are falling to a cognitive virus.

                                        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • richlv@mastodon.socialR richlv@mastodon.social

                                          @kauer @ChuckMcManis @JeremiahFieldhaven Might have been /s, given «odd humour» in the profile 🙂

                                          Also git, indirectly. For those who do not know, look it up.

                                          Tridge is a legend, and our legends are falling to a cognitive virus.

                                          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #42

                                          @richlv

                                          ding, ding, ding. Give this person a donut.

                                          Commit privileges aren't based on bloodline, or history, Etc. When Grandpa tells you the gophers in the back yard are advising him on what to invest his life savings in, you have a gentle conversation with him and move him into a place where he cannot harm himself or others.

                                          We need to hold people updating the code to a standard. You can't get 'fired' in open source, and that's a weakness as folks age out.

                                          @kauer @JeremiahFieldhaven

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups