Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now.

"Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
30 Posts 29 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

    "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

    Link Preview Image
    Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

    In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

    favicon

    Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

    iddinev@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iddinev@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iddinev@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @sarahdalgulls
    Sounds like a localized (USA) problem - I am immensly happy with my Deuter backpacks and my Osprey 35L.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

      "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

      Link Preview Image
      Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

      In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

      favicon

      Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

      gonzalo@neopaquita.esG This user is from outside of this forum
      gonzalo@neopaquita.esG This user is from outside of this forum
      gonzalo@neopaquita.es
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @sarahdalgulls you can get an original, durable, sustainable backpack made by a young designer here: https://daniel-chong.com/en-us/pages/mochilas

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

        "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

        Link Preview Image
        Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

        In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

        favicon

        Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

        ndw@toot.walesN This user is from outside of this forum
        ndw@toot.walesN This user is from outside of this forum
        ndw@toot.wales
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @sarahdalgulls It would be nice to have some legislation that required labeling to identify the ultimate corporate owner for all products. With care taken to prevent loopholes and teeth for violations. But the billionaires don't want that, so no.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

          "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

          Link Preview Image
          Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

          In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

          favicon

          Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

          evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
          evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
          evoscale@c.im
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @sarahdalgulls Fossilizing from birth, is a form of #PlannedObsolescence.

          Then again, my jokes aren't always blooming with effervescence.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

            "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

            Link Preview Image
            Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

            In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

            favicon

            Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

            efscher@fedi.nyc.what.if.uaE This user is from outside of this forum
            efscher@fedi.nyc.what.if.uaE This user is from outside of this forum
            efscher@fedi.nyc.what.if.ua
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @sarahdalgulls Bellroy is still pretty good.  Not cheap, though.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

              "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

              Link Preview Image
              Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

              In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

              favicon

              Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

              3janeta@beige.party3 This user is from outside of this forum
              3janeta@beige.party3 This user is from outside of this forum
              3janeta@beige.party
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @sarahdalgulls I thought this was my imagination but apparently not. That sucks.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

                "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

                Link Preview Image
                Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

                In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

                favicon

                Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

                oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                oddhack@mstdn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @sarahdalgulls wondering if folks know of importers like Zenni (Chinese eyeglasses more or less direct), but that operate in the EU? Prices in Lisboa opticians, of which there seems to be one every block or two, are not quite as bad as the Former US, but still steep.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chloeg@mastodon.artC chloeg@mastodon.art

                  @sarahdalgulls shame the article is written by an AI too.

                  rob_t_firefly@masto.hackers.townR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rob_t_firefly@masto.hackers.townR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rob_t_firefly@masto.hackers.town
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @Chloeg @sarahdalgulls It's by a Palantir employee. https://www.keyana.io I suppose working there does qualify someone as an expert on how and why things are getting fucking worse all the time.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

                    "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

                    In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

                    favicon

                    Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

                    lywyn@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lywyn@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lywyn@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @sarahdalgulls Planned Obsolescence is the subscription model for manufacturers goods.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

                      "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

                      In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

                      favicon

                      Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

                      axeln@norden.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      axeln@norden.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      axeln@norden.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @sarahdalgulls @cstross Now it is called enshittification, in it earlier iteration they made a movie called „Wall Street“ about it. Endgame capitalism.

                      As for this iteration: it is exactly the same in the luxury brand segment – look up LVHM (Louis Vuitton)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

                        "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

                        In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

                        favicon

                        Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

                        fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @sarahdalgulls It's called Quality Fade, and is pretty much standard operating procedure when Private Equity acquires a storied brand known for quality. Muffy Aldrich has a diagram that illustrates this:

                        https://saltwaternewengland.com/2023/03/the-lifecycle-of-clothing-companies.html

                        That said, it is also much easier for consumers to research and the time window for PE to milk a brand for all its equity while they run it into the ground is growing ever shorter.

                        Link Preview Image
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

                          "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

                          In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

                          favicon

                          Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

                          detritus@todon.euD This user is from outside of this forum
                          detritus@todon.euD This user is from outside of this forum
                          detritus@todon.eu
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @sarahdalgulls i wonder who’s behind this site. There’s no “about us” page or anything. Which is sus.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • iddinev@mastodon.socialI iddinev@mastodon.social

                            @sarahdalgulls
                            Sounds like a localized (USA) problem - I am immensly happy with my Deuter backpacks and my Osprey 35L.

                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            drchaos@sauropods.win
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @iddinev @sarahdalgulls Deuter changed the product line in small bike backpacks a lot... I really liked mine, but the new ones don't have the same comfortable back. I have now switched to Osprey, it's slightly better than the new Deuter but not as good as the old one. My partner bought a used Deuter to replace the completely worn out one (I guess after about 20 years of daily use).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH heymarkreeves@mstdn.social

                              @sarahdalgulls https://tombihn.com

                              inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                              inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                              inthehands@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @heymarkreeves @sarahdalgulls

                              Yeah, while agreeing with the larger socioeconomic point of the article, the post’s second sentence isn’t correct. My Tom Bihn is coming up on 20 years old and looks and functions almost like new. Take it as underscoring the article’s point, and pointing a way out: a small, independent company that’s not so growth-focused •can• do better, but it’s Dave vs Goliath.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.socialS sarahdalgulls@ecoevo.social

                                "Your backpack got worse on purpose" Most brands are owned by a handful of companies, and that's why everything is terrible now. You can't spend more on a better product, because there are no better products no matter how much you spend.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose

                                In 1986, a corporation that made women's lingerie bought every backpack brand you've ever trusted.

                                favicon

                                Worse on Purpose (www.worseonpurpose.com)

                                coldclimate@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                coldclimate@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                coldclimate@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @sarahdalgulls I have now bought to coats from Frahm which were big money, but no more than many luxury brands. The difference is that they are a tiny company who focus on quality. I wish there were more of them

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • decanseo@mastodon.ieD decanseo@mastodon.ie

                                  @sarahdalgulls this is straight from the Sam Vimes boots theory of socio-economics
                                  https://terrypratchett.com/explore-discworld/sam-vimes-boots-theory-of-socio-economic-unfairness/

                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ramkay@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @DecAnseo @sarahdalgulls

                                  I was going to share the same thing

                                  The only major difference is the sam vines theory is from the perspective of a poor person.

                                  But essentially the same

                                  This worsening is enforced by keeping people poor - poor wages, make basics more expensive, while the rich as usual walk off with the astronomical margins.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • decanseo@mastodon.ieD decanseo@mastodon.ie

                                    @sarahdalgulls this is straight from the Sam Vimes boots theory of socio-economics
                                    https://terrypratchett.com/explore-discworld/sam-vimes-boots-theory-of-socio-economic-unfairness/

                                    coreysnipes@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    coreysnipes@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    coreysnipes@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @DecAnseo @sarahdalgulls Good ole Sir Terry. He saw so much.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups