Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #WritersCoffeeClub 17 Apr. Can plots which hinge on a misunderstanding be done well?

#WritersCoffeeClub 17 Apr. Can plots which hinge on a misunderstanding be done well?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
writerscoffeecl
16 Posts 10 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    #WritersCoffeeClub 17 Apr (3/3)

    THAT sort of misunderstanding happens in real life and works fine in fiction.

    The sort of misunderstanding that doesn't work in fiction is one that relies on individual protagonists being idiots, or failing to have the thirty second discussion that would clear the air instantly. Which is all too common!

    kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
    kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
    kats@chaosfem.tw
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @cstross I'm not sure of that last point.
    My impression of the rom-com genre is that it largely depends on a misunderstanding that could be cleared up by a 30-second discussion, which the protagonists steadfastly refuse to have until forced into it near the end of the story.

    daburudar@mastodon.socialD skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.euM mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.eu

      @cstross@wandering.shop I think these 'stupidity dependent' misunderstandings are tempting partly because they are easy, but also because they are easy to justify as 'realistic' because we have all seen people being stupid in relationships. But they fundamentally aren't satisfying because we can see how easily the conflict could be resolved from the outside, sort of a deus ex machina in reverse.

      cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstross@wandering.shop
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @mavnn Yes, exactly. Whereas it's much harder to break out of the Abilene Paradox, to which groups or committees are susceptible, so it makes for *great* widescreen tragedy in fiction:

      Link Preview Image
      Abilene paradox - Wikipedia

      favicon

      (en.wikipedia.org)

      mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.euM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

        @mavnn Yes, exactly. Whereas it's much harder to break out of the Abilene Paradox, to which groups or committees are susceptible, so it makes for *great* widescreen tragedy in fiction:

        Link Preview Image
        Abilene paradox - Wikipedia

        favicon

        (en.wikipedia.org)

        mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.euM This user is from outside of this forum
        mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.euM This user is from outside of this forum
        mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.eu
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @cstross@wandering.shop Having been twice made responsible for institutional change in the workplace and then having the person who appointed me lose the authority to push the changes, I have a painfully direct experience of how tough it can be to break out of the Abilene Paradox with a group that has someone well spoken and charismatic in authority who doesn't understand what's happening in the rest of the group. Lots of well meaning people doing things that seem sane, rational, and empathic individually, leading to a Not Good™ and emotionally distructive overall situation.

        Hmm. I think I'm leaking my trauma. But it definitely makes for a stronger plot than 'I need to delay the PoV character five minutes or the entire story ends because they can have a conversation.'

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wellsitegeo@masto.aiW This user is from outside of this forum
          wellsitegeo@masto.aiW This user is from outside of this forum
          wellsitegeo@masto.ai
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @HollieK72 @cstross
          Fiction needs to be *more* convincing than "real life".

          Which is a depressingly low bar to surpass.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kats@chaosfem.twK kats@chaosfem.tw

            @cstross I'm not sure of that last point.
            My impression of the rom-com genre is that it largely depends on a misunderstanding that could be cleared up by a 30-second discussion, which the protagonists steadfastly refuse to have until forced into it near the end of the story.

            daburudar@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            daburudar@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            daburudar@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @KatS @cstross I thought that was unrealistic until I saw all the people on @fesshole who haven't spkoen with their spouse in years.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kats@chaosfem.twK kats@chaosfem.tw

              @cstross I'm not sure of that last point.
              My impression of the rom-com genre is that it largely depends on a misunderstanding that could be cleared up by a 30-second discussion, which the protagonists steadfastly refuse to have until forced into it near the end of the story.

              skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
              skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
              skjeggtroll@mastodon.online
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @KatS @cstross

              I think it makes sense to talk about "load bearing misunderstandings." To work in a story, a misunderstanding must be solid enough to carry the weight of plot placed upon it. In the archetypical badly written rom-com, you end up with so much extra scaffoldingput in to precent the plot from collapsing that you can barely even see the supposedly central misunderstanding any more.

              cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                #WritersCoffeeClub 17 Apr. Can plots which hinge on a misunderstanding be done well?

                Sure! (I did it in my Merchant Princes series, so it MUST be workable 🙂

                To make it work, it has to be the sort of misunderstanding that either the very powerful or very smart, educated people make.

                Committee groupthink is one example.

                "Monarchists think governance and policy-setting in a Repubic work like a monarchy so it'll react to a presidential assassination like the death of a king" is another.

                verain@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                verain@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                verain@c.im
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @cstross Yes. In one of mine, the bad guys misunderstood the heroes defences, resolve, and ability to find an answer to their ultimate weapon. Maybe more of an underestimation, but I think it counts.

                cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS skjeggtroll@mastodon.online

                  @KatS @cstross

                  I think it makes sense to talk about "load bearing misunderstandings." To work in a story, a misunderstanding must be solid enough to carry the weight of plot placed upon it. In the archetypical badly written rom-com, you end up with so much extra scaffoldingput in to precent the plot from collapsing that you can barely even see the supposedly central misunderstanding any more.

                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstross@wandering.shop
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @skjeggtroll @KatS Maybe remember to include the hashtag next time you reply to a discussion on one?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • verain@c.imV verain@c.im

                    @cstross Yes. In one of mine, the bad guys misunderstood the heroes defences, resolve, and ability to find an answer to their ultimate weapon. Maybe more of an underestimation, but I think it counts.

                    cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cstross@wandering.shop
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @Verain Again: remember to include the hashtag for the fiction prompt you're replying to!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      #WritersCoffeeClub 17 Apr (3/3)

                      THAT sort of misunderstanding happens in real life and works fine in fiction.

                      The sort of misunderstanding that doesn't work in fiction is one that relies on individual protagonists being idiots, or failing to have the thirty second discussion that would clear the air instantly. Which is all too common!

                      tallsimon@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tallsimon@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tallsimon@mstdn.ca
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @cstross Perhaps the question pivots more on the lines between "misunderstanding" and things unknown or unknowable, for various reasons, credible or not.

                      Hindsight is absent the uncertainty, all is clear, not least when cause and effect is as defined and understood by those biased by surviving the event.

                      Is a plot point that pivots on a bad model of human politics more or less credible than one that pivots on ignoring the composition of a gas giant? Which misunderstanding will a reader tolerate?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        #WritersCoffeeClub 17 Apr. Can plots which hinge on a misunderstanding be done well?

                        Sure! (I did it in my Merchant Princes series, so it MUST be workable 🙂

                        To make it work, it has to be the sort of misunderstanding that either the very powerful or very smart, educated people make.

                        Committee groupthink is one example.

                        "Monarchists think governance and policy-setting in a Repubic work like a monarchy so it'll react to a presidential assassination like the death of a king" is another.

                        thorne@rants.auT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thorne@rants.auT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thorne@rants.au
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @cstross The key aspect of Merchant Princes which hooked me in was the *absence* of a tired, cliche of misunderstanding:
                        OMG! A portal fantasy where the person in the portal *works it out* and *tests the boundaries* like a real human being! Hook, line and sinker.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • System shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups